Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carson v. Walkergreen2 sentences2011Carson v. Walker, 134 S.W.3d 300, 303 (Tex. App. - Amarillo 2003, pet. denied) (dismissing suit because Carson failed to mention the operative facts underlying his prior lawsuits). 2011Carson v. Walker, 134 S.W.3d 300, 303 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2003, pet. denied) (dismissing suit because Carson failed to mention the operative facts underlying his prior lawsuits). | 3 | 3 |
Thomas v. Knightgreen2 sentences2002Williams, 33 S.W.3d at 412 ; see Thomas v. Knight , 52 S.W.3d 292, 294-96 (Tex. App. B Corpus Christi 2001, pet. denied) (holding that dismissal for inmate = s failure to comply with section 14.004(a) is not on the merits; dismissal with prejudice is improper). 2002See Thomas , 52 S.W.3d at 295 ; Williams v. Brown , 33 S.W.3d 410, 412 (Tex. App. B Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Williams v. Browngreen2 sentences2002See Thomas , 52 S.W.3d at 295 ; Williams v. Brown , 33 S.W.3d 410, 412 (Tex. App. B Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.). 2002Williams, 33 S.W.3d at 412 ; see Thomas v. Knight , 52 S.W.3d 292, 294-96 (Tex. App. B Corpus Christi 2001, pet. denied) (holding that dismissal for inmate = s failure to comply with section 14.004(a) is not on the merits; dismissal with prejudice is improper). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.