Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
38 Hawaii opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Raquinio v. Nakaneluagreen2 sentences2012The separate judgment document rule under the holding in Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright applies to a secondary appeal from a circuit court order that adjudicates an administrative appeal. see, €.9., Raquinio v. Nakanelua, 77 Hawai'i 499, 500, 889 P.2d4 76, 77 (App. 1995) ("We conclude .. . that the requirements for appealability set forth in Jenkins apply to appeals from circuit court orders deciding appeals from orders entered by the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations."). 2010Therefore, the separate judgment document rule under the holding in Jenkins applies to a secondary appeal from a circuit court order that adjudicates an administrative appeal, See, e.g., gaquinio v. Nakanelua, 77 Hawafi 499, 500, 889 P.2d 76, 77 (App. l995) ("We conclude . . . that the requirements for appealability set forth in Jenkins apply to appeals from circuit court orders deciding appeals from orders entered by the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations."). | 15 | 15 |
Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wrightgreen2 sentences2017The separate judgment document rule under Rule 58 of the Hawai‘i Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) and the holding in Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai‘i 115, 869 P.2d 1334 (1994) is not applicable to district court cases. 2016The separate judgment document rule under Rule 58 of the Hawai‘i Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) and the holding in Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawaii 115, 869 P.2d 1334 (1994), is not applicable to district court cases. | 4 | 22 |
S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country Clubgreen2 sentences2020S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country Club, 75 Haw. 480, 494-95 , 866 P.2d 951, 960 (1994) (citations, internal quotation marks, and ellipsis points omitted). 2020S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country Club, 75 Haw. 480, 494-95 , 866 P.2d 951, 960 (1994) (citations, internal quotation marks, and ellipsis points omitted). | 3 | 3 |
Bailey v. Duvauchelle.green1 sentence2018Under the separate judgment document rule, "an order is not appealable, even if it resolves all claims against the parties, until it has been reduced to a separate judgment." Carlisle v. One (1) Boat, 119 Hawai‘i 245, 254, 195 P.3d 1177, 1186 iy Rule 81i(e) of the Hawai‘i Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the Hawai'i Rules of Civil Procedure "shall apply to any proceedings in a circuit court pursuant to appeal to the circuit court from a governmental official or body (other than a court), except as otherwise provided in Rule 72," NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC R | 1 | 1 |
Tax Appeal of Alford v. City & County of Honolulugreen1 sentence2011Consequently, "an order disposing of a circuit court case is appealable when the order is reduced to a separate judgment." Alford v. City and Count of Honolulu, 109 Hawai‘i 14, 20, 122 P.3d 809, 815 (2005) (citation omitted; emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carlisle v. One (1) Boat
green
1 sentence2018Under the separate judgment document rule, "an order is not appealable, even if it resolves all claims against the parties, until it has been reduced to a separate judgment." Carlisle v. One (1) Boat, 119 Hawai‘i 245, 254, 195 P.3d 1177, 1186 iy Rule 81i(e) of the Hawai‘i Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the Hawai'i Rules of Civil Procedure "shall apply to any proceedings in a circuit court pursuant to appeal to the circuit court from a governmental official or body (other than a court), except as otherwise provided in Rule 72," NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC R | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.