Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
33 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gonzalez v. City of Harlingengreen2 sentences2018Palmer v. Ensearch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.); see Gonzalez v. City of Harlingen, 814 S.W.2d 109, 112 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied). 2001See Gonzalez v. City of Harlingen, 814 S.W.2d 109, 112 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied). | 20 | 20 |
Palmer v. Enserch Corp.green2 sentences2009Once the movant establishes an affirmative defense, the burden of production shifts to the nonmovant to present summary-judgment evidence to defeat the movant's affirmative defense. (3) Palmer v. Enserch Corp ., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex. App.--Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.); see also Casso v. Brand , 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex. 1989) (stating that burden does not shift to nonmovant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law). 2001See Medrano v. City of Pearsall, 989 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ager, 977 S.W.2d at 660 ; see also Casso v. Brand, 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex.1989) (burden does not shift to non-movant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law); Palmer v. Enserch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“If a movant establishes an affirmative defense ..., the non-moving party must then adduce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the affirmative defense, for example, facts which would bring the matter within an exception or de | 10 | 11 |
" MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum Companygreen2 sentences1995“Moore” Burger, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 492 S.W.2d 934, 936-937 (Tex.1972); Jampole v. Matthews, 857 S.W.2d 57, 60 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, writ den’d); Palmer v. Enserch Corporation, 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.-Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1992See "Moore" Burger, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. , 492 S.W.2d 934 (Tex. 1972); Palmer v. Enserch , 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex. App. 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.). | 3 | 3 |
Casso v. Brandgreen2 sentences2009Once the movant establishes an affirmative defense, the burden of production shifts to the nonmovant to present summary-judgment evidence to defeat the movant's affirmative defense. (3) Palmer v. Enserch Corp ., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex. App.--Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.); see also Casso v. Brand , 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex. 1989) (stating that burden does not shift to nonmovant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law). 2001See Medrano v. City of Pearsall, 989 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ager, 977 S.W.2d at 660 ; see also Casso v. Brand, 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex.1989) (burden does not shift to non-movant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law); Palmer v. Enserch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“If a movant establishes an affirmative defense ..., the non-moving party must then adduce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the affirmative defense, for example, facts which would bring the matter within an exception or de | 2 | 2 |
Cameron County v. Carrillogreen2 sentences2000Cameron County v. Carrillo , 7 S.W.3d 706, 711 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1999, no pet.). 2000Cameron County v. Carrillo , 7 S.W.3d 706, 711 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1999, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Medrano v. City of Pearsallgreen1 sentence2001See Medrano v. City of Pearsall, 989 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ager, 977 S.W.2d at 660 ; see also Casso v. Brand, 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex.1989) (burden does not shift to non-movant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law); Palmer v. Enserch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“If a movant establishes an affirmative defense ..., the non-moving party must then adduce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the affirmative defense, for example, facts which would bring the matter within an exception or de | 1 | 1 |
Jampole v. Matthewsgreen1 sentence1995“Moore” Burger, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 492 S.W.2d 934, 936-937 (Tex.1972); Jampole v. Matthews, 857 S.W.2d 57, 60 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, writ den’d); Palmer v. Enserch Corporation, 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.-Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.
green
1 sentence2001Id. at Once the movant establishes an affirmative defense which would bar the suit as a matter of law, the non-movant must produce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the affirmative defense. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Ager v. Wichita General Hospital
green
1 sentence2001See Medrano v. City of Pearsall, 989 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ager, 977 S.W.2d at 660 ; see also Casso v. Brand, 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex.1989) (burden does not shift to non-movant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law); Palmer v. Enserch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“If a movant establishes an affirmative defense ..., the non-moving party must then adduce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the affirmative defense, for example, facts which would bring the matter within an exception or de | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Cobb v. West Texas Microwave Co.
green
1 sentence1987See, “Moore” Burger, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 492 S.W.2d 934 (Tex.1972); Cobb v. West Texas *436 Microwave Co., 700 S.W.2d 615 (Tex.App.1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.