Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
33 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 2002–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences2026See Johnson v. State, 967 S.W.2d 410, 417 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (recognizing that a violation of an evidentiary rule that results in the erroneous admission of evidence is subject to a non-constitutional harm analysis). 2020Johnson v. State, 967 S.W.2d 410, 417 (Tex. Crim. | 20 | 20 |
Martin v. Stategreen2 sentences2022See Martin v. State, 176 S.W.3d 887, 897 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.). 2018See Martin v. State, 176 S.W.3d 887, 897 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.). | 4 | 4 |
Geuder v. Stategreen2 sentences2015P. 44.2(b); Geuder v. State, 142 S.W.3d 372, 376 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). 2015See Geuder v. State, 142 S.W.3d 372, 376 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d). | 4 | 4 |
Russell v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Russell v. State, 155 S.W.3d 176, 181 (Tex. Crim. 2021The Admission of the Officer’s Testimony Affected Cook’s Substantial Rights A violation of an evidentiary rule constitutes “non-constitutional [error] . . . and will be disregarded unless it affected the appellant’s substantial rights.” Allen v. State, 436 S.W.3d 815, 823 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2014, pet. ref’d) (quoting Bryant v. State, 282 S.W.3d 156, 161 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, pet. ref’d) (quoting Russell v. State, 155 S.W.3d 176, 181 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Joe Louis Tienda v. Stategreen2 sentences2024“The violation of an evidentiary rule that results in the erroneous admission of evidence constitutes non[-]constitutional error.” Tienda v. State, 479 S.W.3d 863, 880 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2015, no pet.) (citing TEX. 2016Tienda, 479 S.W.3d at 880 . | 1 | 2 |
Dennis Eugene Allen v. Stategreen1 sentence2021The Admission of the Officer’s Testimony Affected Cook’s Substantial Rights A violation of an evidentiary rule constitutes “non-constitutional [error] . . . and will be disregarded unless it affected the appellant’s substantial rights.” Allen v. State, 436 S.W.3d 815, 823 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2014, pet. ref’d) (quoting Bryant v. State, 282 S.W.3d 156, 161 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, pet. ref’d) (quoting Russell v. State, 155 S.W.3d 176, 181 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Bryant v. Stategreen1 sentence2021The Admission of the Officer’s Testimony Affected Cook’s Substantial Rights A violation of an evidentiary rule constitutes “non-constitutional [error] . . . and will be disregarded unless it affected the appellant’s substantial rights.” Allen v. State, 436 S.W.3d 815, 823 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2014, pet. ref’d) (quoting Bryant v. State, 282 S.W.3d 156, 161 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, pet. ref’d) (quoting Russell v. State, 155 S.W.3d 176, 181 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Yanez v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Yanez v. State, 199 S.W.3d 293, 308 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.); non-constitutional error is reversible error only if it affects the substantial rights of the party injured by the error. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.