Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
30 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 2021–2024 30 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ramos v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2022The jury unanimity rule set forth in Ramos v. Louisiana, U.S. _, 140 S.Ct. 1390 , 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) does not apply retroactively in Louisiana. 2022The jury unanimity rule set forth in Ramos v. Louisiana, U.S. _, 140 S.Ct. 1390 , 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) does not apply retroactively in Louisiana. | 27 | 2022–2022 |
Danforth v. Minnesota
green
2 sentences2024The Edwards Court notes, however, that states remained free to retroactively apply the jury-unanimity rule as a matter of state law in state post-conviction proceedings if they chose to do so. 141 S.Ct. at 1559, n.6 (citing Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. 264, 282 , 128 S.Ct. 1029 , 169 L.Ed.2d 859 (2008)). 2024The Edwards Court notes, however, that states remained free to retroactively apply the jury-unanimity rule as a matter of state law in state post-conviction proceedings if they chose to do so. 141 S.Ct. at 1559, n.6 (citing Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. 264, 282 , 128 S.Ct. 1029 , 169 L.Ed.2d 859 (2008)). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Edwards v. Vannoy
green
1 sentence2024The Supreme Court further held in Edwards v. Vannoy, 593 U.S. 255 , 141 S.Ct. 1547 , 1554 (2021), that the jury-unanimity rule in Ramos does not apply retroactively on federal collateral review. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Whitley
green
1 sentence2022Taylor v. Whitley, 606 So.2d 1292 (La. 1992).4 Therefore, this Court remains free to consider the retroactivity of the jury unanimity requirement in state post-conviction proceedings using a Teague analysis. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Brown v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2021The U.S. Supreme Court then retroactively applied this jury- unanimity rule in Brown v. Louisiana, 447 U.S. 323 , 100 S.Ct. 2214 , 65 L.Ed.2d 159 (1980), recognizing trial by jury in serious criminal cases has long been regarded as an indispensable protection against the possibility of governmental oppression. 2021The U.S. Supreme Court then retroactively applied this jury- unanimity rule in Brown v. Louisiana, 447 U.S. 323 , 100 S.Ct. 2214 , 65 L.Ed.2d 159 (1980), recognizing trial by jury in serious criminal cases has long been regarded as an indispensable protection against the possibility of governmental oppression. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.