Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
29 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1906–1979 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Scott v. Gardnergreen2 sentences1972Our Supreme Court in Scott v. Gardner, 137 Tex. 628 , 156 S.W.2d 513 , 141 A.L.R. 50 , specifically held: “In the absence of special exception the petition will be liberally construed in the pleader’s favor and to support the judgment.” Points 1 and 2, 156 S.W.2d at page 515 . 1972Our Supreme Court in Scott v. Gardner, 137 Tex. 628 , 156 S.W.2d 513 , 141 A.L.R. 50 , specifically held: “In the absence of special exception the petition will be liberally construed in the pleader’s favor and to support the judgment.” Points 1 and 2, 156 S.W.2d at page 515 . | 3 | 19 |
Scott v. Gardnergreen2 sentences1972Our Supreme Court in Scott v. Gardner, 137 Tex. 628 , 156 S.W.2d 513 , 141 A.L.R. 50 , specifically held: “In the absence of special exception the petition will be liberally construed in the pleader’s favor and to support the judgment.” Points 1 and 2, 156 S.W.2d at page 515 . 1972Our Supreme Court in Scott v. Gardner, 137 Tex. 628 , 156 S.W.2d 513 , 141 A.L.R. 50 , specifically held: “In the absence of special exception the petition will be liberally construed in the pleader’s favor and to support the judgment.” Points 1 and 2, 156 S.W.2d at page 515 . | 2 | 18 |
McBeath v. Campbellgreen1 sentence1956See McBeath v. Campbell, Tex.Com.App., 12 S.W.2d 118 . | 1 | 1 |
Osborne v. Prathergreen2 sentences1938See Osborne v. Prather, 83 Tex. 208 , 18 S.W. 613 ; Mayfield v. Averitt's Adm'r, 11 Tex. 140 . 1938See Osborne v. Prather, 83 Tex. 208 , 18 S.W. 613 ; Mayfield v. Averitt's Adm'r, 11 Tex. 140 . | 1 | 1 |
Killebrew v. Stockdalegreen1 sentence1906See Killebrew v. Stockdale, 51 Texas, 529 ; Kinney v. Lee, 10 Texas, 155 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
John F. Buckner & Sons v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Corp.
green
2 sentences1966Buckner & Sons v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Corp., (n. r. e.) Tex.Civ.App., 319 S.W.2d 204 ; Scott v. Gardner, 137 Tex. 628 , 156 S.W.2d 513 , 141 A.L.R. 50 .” See also Allied Paint-Patterson Sargent Div. v. Wallace, 400 S.W.2d 18 , (Tex.Civ.App.) 1966, n. w. h. 1966Buckner & Sons v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Corp., (n. r. e.) Tex.Civ.App., 319 S.W.2d 204 ; Scott v. Gardner, 137 Tex. 628 , 156 S.W.2d 513 , 141 A.L.R. 50 . | 2 | 1966–1966 |
Hovencamp v. Union Stock Yards Co.
neutral
2 sentences1941Schuster v. Frendfenthal, 74 Texas 53 , 11 S. W. 1051 ; Hovencamp v. Union Stockyards Co., 107 Texas 421 , 180 S. W. 225 ; Humphreys Oil Co. v. Liles, (Com. 1941Schuster v. Frendfenthal, 74 Texas 53 , 11 S. W. 1051 ; Hovencamp v. Union Stockyards Co., 107 Texas 421 , 180 S. W. 225 ; Humphreys Oil Co. v. Liles, (Com. | 2 | 1941–1941 |
Schuster v. L. B. Frendenthal & Co.
green
2 sentences1941Schuster v. Frendfenthal, 74 Texas 53 , 11 S. W. 1051 ; Hovencamp v. Union Stockyards Co., 107 Texas 421 , 180 S. W. 225 ; Humphreys Oil Co. v. Liles, (Com. 1941Schuster v. Frendfenthal, 74 Texas 53 , 11 S. W. 1051 ; Hovencamp v. Union Stockyards Co., 107 Texas 421 , 180 S. W. 225 ; Humphreys Oil Co. v. Liles, (Com. | 2 | 1941–1941 |
Allied Paint-Patterson Sargent Division-H. K. Porter Co. v. Wallace
neutral
1 sentence1966Buckner & Sons v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Corp., (n. r. e.) Tex.Civ.App., 319 S.W.2d 204 ; Scott v. Gardner, 137 Tex. 628 , 156 S.W.2d 513 , 141 A.L.R. 50 .” See also Allied Paint-Patterson Sargent Div. v. Wallace, 400 S.W.2d 18 , (Tex.Civ.App.) 1966, n. w. h. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Fine v. Pratt
green
1 sentence1963Fine v. Pratt, Tex.Civ.App.1941, 150 S.W.2d 308, 313 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Tolson v. Carroll
green
1 sentence1959This Court, in Tolson v. Carroll, 313 S.W.2d 131 (N.W.H.), specifically held that the foregoing Rule applies with equal force to pleadings involved in a plea of privilege. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Atkinson v. Thompson
green
2 sentences1959Atkinson v. Thompson, supra. While we realize defendants filed special exceptions, they were not acted on. 1959Atkinson v. Thompson, Tex.Civ.App., 311 S.W.2d 250 , n. r. e. Though there be pure conclusions of fact, they suffice in the absence of special exception. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Humphreys Oil Co. v. Liles
green
1 sentence1941Schuster v. Frendenthal, 74 Tex. 53 , 11 S.W. 1051 ; Hovencamp v. Union Stockyards Co., 107 Tex. 421 , 180 S.W. 225 ; Humphreys Oil Co. v. Liles, Tex.Com.App., 277 S.W. 100 . | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Mayfield v. Averitt's Adm'r
neutral
2 sentences1938See Osborne v. Prather, 83 Tex. 208 , 18 S.W. 613 ; Mayfield v. Averitt’s Adm’r, 11 Tex. 140 . 1938See Osborne v. Prather, 83 Tex. 208 , 18 S.W. 613 ; Mayfield v. Averitt's Adm'r, 11 Tex. 140 . | 1 | 1938–1938 |
City of Fort Worth v. Rosen
neutral
1 sentence1935City of Fort Worth v. Rosen (Tex.Com.App.) 228 S.W. 933 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Williams v. Finley
neutral
2 sentences1931Williams v. Finley, 99 Tex. 468 , 90 S. W. 1087 . 1931Williams v. Finley, 99 Tex. 468 , 90 S. W. 1087 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
First National Bank of Eagle Lake v. Robinson
neutral
1 sentence1911Maddox v. Craig, 80 Tex. 600 , 16 S. W. 328 ; Bank v. Robinson (Sup.) 135 S. W. 372 ; Lanier v. Jones (Sup.) 136 S. W. 255 ; Rutherford v. Gaines (Sup.) 120 S. W. 261 ; Smith v. Norton (Civ. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Maddox v. Craig
neutral
1 sentence1911Maddox v. Craig, 80 Tex. 600 , 16 S. W. 328 ; Bank v. Robinson (Sup.) 135 S. W. 372 ; Lanier v. Jones (Sup.) 136 S. W. 255 ; Rutherford v. Gaines (Sup.) 120 S. W. 261 ; Smith v. Norton (Civ. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Lanier v. Jones
green
1 sentence1911Maddox v. Craig, 80 Tex. 600 , 16 S. W. 328 ; Bank v. Robinson (Sup.) 135 S. W. 372 ; Lanier v. Jones (Sup.) 136 S. W. 255 ; Rutherford v. Gaines (Sup.) 120 S. W. 261 ; Smith v. Norton (Civ. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Kinney v. Lee
neutral
1 sentence1906See Killebrew v. Stockdale, 51 Texas, 529 ; Kinney v. Lee, 10 Texas, 155 . | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.