Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
33 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
LaPoint v. Stategreen2 sentences2022If he is unable to do so, the error will not result in a reversal of his conviction.” LaPoint v. State, 750 S.W.2d 180, 191 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (op. on reh’g). 1989In LaPoint , at 191, we noted it is the defendant's burden under Art. 36.19, V.A.C.C.P., to persuade the reviewing court that he suffered some actual harm as a consequence of the charging error. | 13 | 16 |
Abdnor v. Stategreen2 sentences2000And, "the burden of proof lies with the defendant to persuade the reviewing court that he suffered some actual harm as a consequence of the charging error." Id. 2000And, “the burden of proof lies with the defendant to persuade the reviewing court that he suffered some actual harm as a consequence of the charging error.” Id. | 11 | 24 |
Belyeu v. Stategreen2 sentences2009Id. ; see also Belyeu v. State , 791 S.W.2d 66, 75 (Tex. Crim. 2002Id.; see also Belyeu v. State, 791 S.W.2d 66, 75 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); La-Point v. State, 750 S.W.2d 180, 191 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (op. on reh’g); Gornick v. State, 947 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1997, no pet.). | 8 | 8 |
Gornick v. Stategreen2 sentences2002Id.; see also Belyeu v. State, 791 S.W.2d 66, 75 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); LaPoint v. State, 750 S.W.2d 180, 191 (Tex. Crim.App.1986) (op. on reh'g); Gornick v. State, 947 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1997, no pet.). 2002Id.; see also Belyeu v. State, 791 S.W.2d 66, 75 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); La-Point v. State, 750 S.W.2d 180, 191 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (op. on reh’g); Gornick v. State, 947 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1997, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Almanza v. Statered2 sentences2008If he is unable to do so, the error will not result in a reversal of his conviction.”23 The statement was later relied on 18 Dickey, 22 S.W .3d, at 492. 19 Almanza, 686 S.W.2d, at 171 (emphasis in original). 20 Dickey, 22 S.W .3d, at 492. 21 Arline, 721 S.W.2d, at 351 (citing Almanza, 686 S.W .2d, at 171). 22 750 S.W.2d 180 (Tex. Cr. 2000In determining whether some harm exists, we must take into account “the entire jury-charge, the state of the evidence, including the contested issues and weight of probative evidence, the argument of counsel and any other relevant information revealed by the record of the trial as a whole.” Almanza, 686 S.W.2d at 171 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Arline v. State
green
1 sentence2008If he is unable to do so, the error will not result in a reversal of his conviction.”23 The statement was later relied on 18 Dickey, 22 S.W .3d, at 492. 19 Almanza, 686 S.W.2d, at 171 (emphasis in original). 20 Dickey, 22 S.W .3d, at 492. 21 Arline, 721 S.W.2d, at 351 (citing Almanza, 686 S.W .2d, at 171). 22 750 S.W.2d 180 (Tex. Cr. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.