Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
25 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2026 12 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Authoritygreen2 sentences2025Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 82 Ohio St.3d 270, 271 (1998). 2025Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 1998-Ohio-239 , 82 Ohio St. 3d 270, 271 (1998), citing State ex rel. | 3 | 5 |
Pegan v. Crawmergreen2 sentences2024Id., citing R.C. 2725.06. 2024Id., citing Hammond v. Dallman, 63 Ohio St.3d 666, 668 (1992), fn. 7. {¶ 18} A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for writ of habeas corpus when it does not contain “ ‘a facially valid claim.’ ” State v. Troupe, 8th Dist. | 2 | 12 |
Hammond v. Dallmangreen2 sentences2026Id., citing Hammond v. Dallman, 63 Ohio St.3d 666, 668, fn. 7 (1992). {¶ 28} A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for writ of habeas corpus when it does not contain “ ‘a facially valid claim.’ ” State v. Troupe, 2020-Ohio-931 , ¶ 12 (8th Dist.), quoting Al’Shahid v. Cook, 2015-Ohio-2079 , ¶ 7. 2024Id., citing Hammond v. Dallman, 63 Ohio St.3d 666, 668 (1992), fn. 7. {¶ 18} A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for writ of habeas corpus when it does not contain “ ‘a facially valid claim.’ ” State v. Troupe, 8th Dist. | 2 | 4 |
Chari v. Voregreen2 sentences2023See Chari v. Vore, 91 Ohio St.3d 323, 327 (2001). {¶11} Upon receipt of a petition, a court must make an initial determination as to whether the petition states a facially valid claim. 2013"In turn, 'if the court decides that the petition states a facially valid claim, it must allow the writ.'" Id., quoting Chari v. Vore, 91 Ohio St.3d 323, 327 (2001). | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Al'shahid v. Cook
green
2 sentences2023Also, “a court may dismiss a habeas petition sua sponte if the petition does not contain a facially valid claim.” Al’Shahid v. Cook, 144 Ohio St.3d 15 , 2015-Ohio-2079 , 40 N.E.3d 1073, ¶ 7 , citing State ex rel. 2023No. 22CA011877, 2022-Ohio-2911, ¶ 5 , citing Watkins v. Collins, 111 Ohio St.3d 425 , 2006- Ohio-5082, ¶ 35. {¶ 21} A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for writ of habeas corpus when it does not contain “ ‘a facially valid claim.’ ” Troupe at ¶ 12, quoting Al’Shahid v. Cook, 144 Ohio St.3d 15 , 2015-Ohio-2079 , ¶ 7. | 6 | 2023–2024 |
Holloway v. Clermont County Department of Human Services
green
2 sentences2005Dept. of Human Services, 80 Ohio St.3d 128 , 130 , 1997-Ohio-131 . {¶ 3} If a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus presents a facially valid claim, a court must allow the writ and order the respondent to make a return showing the cause of the detention. 2005Dept. of Human Services, 80 Ohio St.3d 128 , 130 , 1997-Ohio-131 . {¶ 3} If a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus presents a facially valid claim, a court must allow the writ and order the respondent to make a return showing the cause of the detention. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Holloway v. Clermont Cty. Dept. of Human Serv.
neutral
2 sentences2005Dept. of Human Services, 80 Ohio St.3d 128 , 130 , 1997-Ohio-131 . {¶ 3} If a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus presents a facially valid claim, a court must allow the writ and order the respondent to make a return showing the cause of the detention. 2005Dept. of Human Services, 80 Ohio St.3d 128 , 130 , 1997-Ohio-131 . {¶ 3} If a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus presents a facially valid claim, a court must allow the writ and order the respondent to make a return showing the cause of the detention. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Pegan v. Crawmer
neutral
2 sentences2026Id., citing R.C. 2725.06. 2026Id., citing Hammond v. Dallman, 63 Ohio St.3d 666, 668, fn. 7 (1992). {¶ 28} A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for writ of habeas corpus when it does not contain “ ‘a facially valid claim.’ ” State v. Troupe, 2020-Ohio-931 , ¶ 12 (8th Dist.), quoting Al’Shahid v. Cook, 2015-Ohio-2079 , ¶ 7. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
neutral
1 sentence2025Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 1998-Ohio-239 , 82 Ohio St. 3d 270, 271 (1998), citing State ex rel. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In re Burns
neutral
1 sentence2023No. 22CA011877, 2022-Ohio-2911, ¶ 5 , citing Watkins v. Collins, 111 Ohio St.3d 425 , 2006- Ohio-5082, ¶ 35. {¶ 21} A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for writ of habeas corpus when it does not contain “ ‘a facially valid claim.’ ” Troupe at ¶ 12, quoting Al’Shahid v. Cook, 144 Ohio St.3d 15 , 2015-Ohio-2079 , ¶ 7. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Watkins v. Collins
green
1 sentence2023No. 22CA011877, 2022-Ohio-2911, ¶ 5 , citing Watkins v. Collins, 111 Ohio St.3d 425 , 2006- Ohio-5082, ¶ 35. {¶ 21} A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for writ of habeas corpus when it does not contain “ ‘a facially valid claim.’ ” Troupe at ¶ 12, quoting Al’Shahid v. Cook, 144 Ohio St.3d 15 , 2015-Ohio-2079 , ¶ 7. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State ex rel. Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
green
2 sentences2020Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 80 Ohio St.3d 637, 638 , 687 N.E.2d 759 (1998). 2020Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 80 Ohio St.3d 637, 638 , 687 N.E.2d 759 (1998). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Anderson v. Eighth Dist. Court of Appeals
green
1 sentence2018Oliver alleges that his 2005 sentence for domestic violence was to be served concurrently with, not consecutively to, his 1993 sentence for involuntary manslaughter and that he is therefore entitled to immediate release. *606 {¶ 5} Because the petition states a facially valid claim, we ordered Turner to file a return of the writ, 152 Ohio St.3d 1403 , 2018-Ohio-723 , 92 N.E.3d 876 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Farmers State Bank v. Sponaugle
green
2 sentences2018Oliver alleges that his 2005 sentence for domestic violence was to be served concurrently with, not consecutively to, his 1993 sentence for involuntary manslaughter and that he is therefore entitled to immediate release. *606 {¶ 5} Because the petition states a facially valid claim, we ordered Turner to file a return of the writ, 152 Ohio St.3d 1403 , 2018-Ohio-723 , 92 N.E.3d 876 . 2018Oliver alleges that his 2005 sentence for domestic violence was to be served concurrently with, not consecutively to, his 1993 sentence for involuntary manslaughter and that he is therefore entitled to immediate release. *606 {¶ 5} Because the petition states a facially valid claim, we ordered Turner to file a return of the writ, 152 Ohio St.3d 1403 , 2018-Ohio-723 , 92 N.E.3d 876 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Gaskins v. Shiplevy
green
2 sentences2008"Then, if the court decides that the petition states a facially valid claim, it must allow the writ." Id., citing R.C. 2725.06 . 2008"Conversely, if the petition states a claim for which habeas corpus relief cannot be granted the court should not allow the writ and should dismiss the petition." Id., citing Pegan v. Crawmer (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 607 , 609 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.