Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pilarcik v. Emmonsgreen2 sentences2019Under Texas law, “restrictive covenants are subject to the general rules of contract construction.” Pilarcik v. Emmons, 966 S.W.2d 474, 478 (Tex. 1998). 8 Under the Texas Property Code, a homeowners’ association may exercise “discretionary authority” to enforce a restrictive covenant, and if it does so, the Association’s conduct is presumably “reasonable[,] unless the court determines by a preponderance of the evidence that the exercise of discretionary authority was arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory.” 14 The evidence the Association presented in response to the Salamahs’ motion shows t 2018Under Texas law, “restrictive covenants are subject to the general rules of contract construction.” Pilarcik v. Emmons, 966 S.W.2d 474, 478 (Tex. 1998). 8 Under the Texas Property Code, a homeowners’ association may exercise “discretionary authority” to enforce a restrictive covenant, and if it does so, the Association’s conduct is presumably “reasonable[,] unless the court determines by a preponderance of the evidence that the exercise of discretionary authority was arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory.” 14 The evidence the Association presented in response to the Salamahs’ motion shows t | 2 | 2 |
cluster 522206green2 sentences2018See Thompson v. City of Starkville, Miss., 901 F.2d 456, 460 (5th Cir. 1990) (citing Frazier v. King, 873 F.2d 820, 825 (5th Cir. 1989)). 2017Thompson v. City of Starkville, Miss., 901 F.2d 456, 460 (5th Cir. 1990) (quoting Frazier v. King, 873 F.2d 820, 825 (5th Cir. 1989)). | 2 | 2 |
Harvey A. Thompson v. City of Starkville, Mississippi, David Lindley, Larry Sisk, and Jimmy Raines, Individually and in Their Official Capacitiesgreen2 sentences2018See Thompson v. City of Starkville, Miss., 901 F.2d 456, 460 (5th Cir. 1990) (citing Frazier v. King, 873 F.2d 820, 825 (5th Cir. 1989)). 2017Thompson v. City of Starkville, Miss., 901 F.2d 456, 460 (5th Cir. 1990) (quoting Frazier v. King, 873 F.2d 820, 825 (5th Cir. 1989)). | 2 | 2 |
Klumb v. Houston Municipal Employees Pension Systemgreen1 sentence2024See id. at 13 n.8 (citing First American Title Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Caleb v. Carranzagreen1 sentence2022Caleb v. Carranza, 518 S.W.3d 537, 544 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017, no pet.) (citing Beattie v. Madison Cnty. | 1 | 1 |
Ex parte Duquegreen1 sentence2022See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.