Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
157 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
High v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. 2022See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. | 138 | 139 |
Gainous v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. 2013See Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. | 5 | 6 |
Currie v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. 2015See Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. | 4 | 5 |
Stafford v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503 , 510 n.3 (Tex. Crim. 2002See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503 , 510 n. 3 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Anders v. Californiagreen2 sentences2024The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. 2022The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. | 1 | 155 |
In re D.A.S.green1 sentence2012See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App.1969); see also In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 298 (Tex.1998) (Texas Supreme Court held that the Anders procedure applies to juvenile appeals and noted that, although juvenile-delinquency proceedings are classified as civil, their nature is quasi- criminal). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. State
green
1 sentence2012See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App.1969); see also In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 298 (Tex.1998) (Texas Supreme Court held that the Anders procedure applies to juvenile appeals and noted that, although juvenile-delinquency proceedings are classified as civil, their nature is quasi- criminal). | 1 | 2012–2012 |