joint assignment error (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

joint assignment error in Indiana

24 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1882–1939 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Armstrong v. Dunngreen
ind · 1895 · cited in 5 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1896–1908
2 sentences

1908Armstrong v. Dunn [1896], 143 Ind. 433 , and cases there cited; Elliott, App. Proc., §318.

1903Armstrong v. Dunn, 143 Ind. 433, 436, 437 .

25

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (44)

CaseCitedYears
Carr v. Carr neutral
ind · 1894
2 sentences

1917Carr v. Carr (1894), 137 Ind. 232 , 36 N. E. 899 ; Supreme Council, etc. v. Boyle (1895), 15 Ind. App. 342 , 44 N. E. 56 .

1917Carr v. Carr (1894), 137 Ind. 232 , 36 N. E. 899 ; Supreme Council, etc. v. Boyle (1895), 15 Ind. App. 342 , 44 N. E. 56 .

41895–1917
Sibert v. Copeland neutral
ind · 1896
2 sentences

1934Elliott’s Appellate Procedure, also Sibert et al. v. Copeland et al. (1896), 146 Ind. 387 , 44 N. E. 305 .

1908In Sibert v. Copeland (1896), 146 Ind. 387 , cited by appellant, the court says upon this question: “The rule is ivell settled by repeated decisions of this court that a joint assignment of error must be good as to all the appellants who joined therein, or it will be good as to none.

31900–1934
Orton v. Tiller neutral
ind · 1887
2 sentences

1916Whitesell v. Strickler, supra; Orten v. Tilden (1887), 110 Ind. 131 , 10 N. E. 936 , and cases cited; Ditton v. Hart (1910), 175 Ind. 181, 185 , 93 N. E. 961 .

1916Whitesell v. Strickler, supra; Orten v. Tilden (1887), 110 Ind. 131 , 10 N. E. 936 , and cases cited; Ditton v. Hart (1910), 175 Ind. 181, 185 , 93 N. E. 961 .

31895–1916
Hubbard v. Bell neutral
indctapp · 1892
2 sentences

1911Doty v. Patterson (1900), 155 Ind. 60 ; 2 Thornton’s Civil Code §462, pp. 997-999; Burns v. Trustees of Huntertown, etc., Church (1903), 31 Ind. App. 640 ; Government Bldg., etc., Inst. v. Richards (1903), 32 Ind. App. 24 ; Green v. Heaston (1900), 154 Ind. 127 ; Hubbard v. Bell (1892), 4 Ind. App. 180, 181 ; Louisville, etc., R.

1900Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hubbard v. Bell, 4 Ind. App. 180 .

31896–1911
Robbins v. Magee neutral
ind · 1884
2 sentences

1895King v. Easton, 135 Ind. 355 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 ; Carr v. Carr, 137 Ind. 232 .

1895Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 ; Hinkle v. Shelley, 100 Ind. 88 ; Quick v. Brenner, 101 Ind. 230 ; Boyd v. Anderson, 102 Ind. 217 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., Church, 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 .

31885–1895
Supreme Council of the Catholic Benevolent Legion v. Boyle neutral
indctapp · 1896
2 sentences

1917Carr v. Carr (1894), 137 Ind. 232 , 36 N. E. 899 ; Supreme Council, etc. v. Boyle (1895), 15 Ind. App. 342 , 44 N. E. 56 .

1917Carr v. Carr (1894), 137 Ind. 232 , 36 N. E. 899 ; Supreme Council, etc. v. Boyle (1895), 15 Ind. App. 342 , 44 N. E. 56 .

21900–1917
Starkey v. Starkey neutral
ind · 1906
2 sentences

1916See cases cited, supra; Starkey v. Starkey (1905), 166 Ind. 140, 143 , 76 N. E. 876 ; Ewbank’s Manual (2ded.) §138; Elliott, App. Proc. §318.

1916See cases cited, supra; Starkey v. Starkey (1905), 166 Ind. 140, 143 , 76 N. E. 876 ; Ewbank’s Manual (2ded.) §138; Elliott, App. Proc. §318.

21909–1916
Ditton v. Hart green
ind · 1911
2 sentences

1916Hayes v. Johnson (1914), 56 Ind, App. 238, 105 N. E. 164 ; Ditton v. Hart (1911), 175 Ind. 181 , 93 N. E. 961 ; Orten v. Tilden, supra. Finding no available error presented by the record, judgment is affirmed.

1916Hayes v. Johnson (1914), 56 Ind, App. 238, 105 N. E. 164 ; Ditton v. Hart (1911), 175 Ind. 181 , 93 N. E. 961 ; Orten v. Tilden, supra. Finding no available error presented by the record, judgment is affirmed.

21916–1916
Green v. Heaston green
ind · 1900
2 sentences

1911Doty v. Patterson (1900), 155 Ind. 60 ; 2 Thornton’s Civil Code §462, pp. 997-999; Burns v. Trustees of Huntertown, etc., Church (1903), 31 Ind. App. 640 ; Government Bldg., etc., Inst. v. Richards (1903), 32 Ind. App. 24 ; Green v. Heaston (1900), 154 Ind. 127 ; Hubbard v. Bell (1892), 4 Ind. App. 180, 181 ; Louisville, etc., R.

1900Green v. Heaston, Rec., 154 Ind. 127 ; Grimes v. Grimes, 141 Ind. 480, 481 ; Louisville, etc., R.

21900–1911
Earhart v. Farmers' Creamery neutral
ind · 1897
2 sentences

1909Ewbank’s Manual §138; Starkey v. Starkey (1906), 166 Ind. 140 , and cases cited; Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 , and cases cited; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 , and cases cited; Sheeks v. State, ex rel. (1901), 156 Ind. 508, 509 ; Yeoman v. Schaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308, 311 , and cases cited; Earhart v. Farmers Creamery (1897), 148 Ind. 79, 80 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 ; Johnson v. Blair (1904), 32 Ind. App. 456 ; McCarty v. Snowbarger (1905), 35 Ind. App. 179 ; Indianapolis St.

1900Ewbank’s Manual, §138; Elliott’s App. Proc., §318; Earhart v. Farmers, etc., Co., 148 Ind. 79 .

21900–1909
In re Removal of Paskins neutral
ind · 1900
2 sentences

1909Ewbank’s Manual §138; Starkey v. Starkey (1906), 166 Ind. 140 , and cases cited; Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 , and cases cited; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 , and cases cited; Sheeks v. State, ex rel. (1901), 156 Ind. 508, 509 ; Yeoman v. Schaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308, 311 , and cases cited; Earhart v. Farmers Creamery (1897), 148 Ind. 79, 80 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 ; Johnson v. Blair (1904), 32 Ind. App. 456 ; McCarty v. Snowbarger (1905), 35 Ind. App. 179 ; Indianapolis St.

1906Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 ; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 ; Yeoman v. Shaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308 ; Crist v. Wayne, etc., Assn. (1900), 155 Ind. 260 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 . 5.

21906–1909
Yeoman v. Shaeffer neutral
ind · 1900
2 sentences

1909Ewbank’s Manual §138; Starkey v. Starkey (1906), 166 Ind. 140 , and cases cited; Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 , and cases cited; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 , and cases cited; Sheeks v. State, ex rel. (1901), 156 Ind. 508, 509 ; Yeoman v. Schaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308, 311 , and cases cited; Earhart v. Farmers Creamery (1897), 148 Ind. 79, 80 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 ; Johnson v. Blair (1904), 32 Ind. App. 456 ; McCarty v. Snowbarger (1905), 35 Ind. App. 179 ; Indianapolis St.

1906Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 ; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 ; Yeoman v. Shaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308 ; Crist v. Wayne, etc., Assn. (1900), 155 Ind. 260 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 . 5.

21906–1909
Bolt v. Ward neutral
ind · 1901
2 sentences

1909Ewbank’s Manual §138; Starkey v. Starkey (1906), 166 Ind. 140 , and cases cited; Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 , and cases cited; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 , and cases cited; Sheeks v. State, ex rel. (1901), 156 Ind. 508, 509 ; Yeoman v. Schaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308, 311 , and cases cited; Earhart v. Farmers Creamery (1897), 148 Ind. 79, 80 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 ; Johnson v. Blair (1904), 32 Ind. App. 456 ; McCarty v. Snowbarger (1905), 35 Ind. App. 179 ; Indianapolis St.

1906Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 ; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 ; Yeoman v. Shaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308 ; Crist v. Wayne, etc., Assn. (1900), 155 Ind. 260 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 . 5.

21906–1909
Bush v. McBride neutral
ind · 1903
2 sentences

1909Ewbank’s Manual §138; Starkey v. Starkey (1906), 166 Ind. 140 , and cases cited; Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 , and cases cited; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 , and cases cited; Sheeks v. State, ex rel. (1901), 156 Ind. 508, 509 ; Yeoman v. Schaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308, 311 , and cases cited; Earhart v. Farmers Creamery (1897), 148 Ind. 79, 80 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 ; Johnson v. Blair (1904), 32 Ind. App. 456 ; McCarty v. Snowbarger (1905), 35 Ind. App. 179 ; Indianapolis St.

1906Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 ; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 ; Yeoman v. Shaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308 ; Crist v. Wayne, etc., Assn. (1900), 155 Ind. 260 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 . 5.

21906–1909
Tucker v. Conrad neutral
ind · 1885
2 sentences

1900Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hubbard v. Bell, 4 Ind. App. 180 .

1895Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 ; Hinkle v. Shelley, 100 Ind. 88 ; Quick v. Brenner, 101 Ind. 230 ; Boyd v. Anderson, 102 Ind. 217 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., Church, 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 .

21895–1900
Hochstedler v. Hochstedler neutral
ind · 1886
2 sentences

1900Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hubbard v. Bell, 4 Ind. App. 180 .

1895Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 ; Hinkle v. Shelley, 100 Ind. 88 ; Quick v. Brenner, 101 Ind. 230 ; Boyd v. Anderson, 102 Ind. 217 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., Church, 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 .

21895–1900
Walker v. Hill green
ind · 1887
2 sentences

1900Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hubbard v. Bell, 4 Ind. App. 180 .

1895Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 ; Hinkle v. Shelley, 100 Ind. 88 ; Quick v. Brenner, 101 Ind. 230 ; Boyd v. Anderson, 102 Ind. 217 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., Church, 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 .

21895–1900
Sparklin v. Wardens & Vestrymen of St. James' Church green
ind · 1889
2 sentences

1900Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hubbard v. Bell, 4 Ind. App. 180 .

1895Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 ; Hinkle v. Shelley, 100 Ind. 88 ; Quick v. Brenner, 101 Ind. 230 ; Boyd v. Anderson, 102 Ind. 217 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., Church, 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 .

21895–1900
Arbuckle v. Swim neutral
ind · 1890
2 sentences

1900Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hubbard v. Bell, 4 Ind. App. 180 .

1895Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 ; Hinkle v. Shelley, 100 Ind. 88 ; Quick v. Brenner, 101 Ind. 230 ; Boyd v. Anderson, 102 Ind. 217 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., Church, 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 .

21895–1900
Hinkle v. Shelley neutral
ind · 1885
2 sentences

1895Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 ; Hinkle v. Shelley, 100 Ind. 88 ; Quick v. Brenner, 101 Ind. 230 ; Boyd v. Anderson, 102 Ind. 217 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506 ; Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223 ; Sparklin v. Wardens, etc., Church, 119 Ind. 535 ; Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208 .

1885Boyd v. Pfeifer, 95 Ind. 599 ; McKee v. Hungate, 99 Ind. 168 ; Hinkle v. Shelley, 100 Ind. 88 .

21885–1895
Eichbredt v. Angerman neutral
ind · 1881
2 sentences

1885Eichbredt v. Angerman, 80 Ind. 208 ; Towell v. Hollweg, 81 Ind. 154 ; Feeney v. Mazelin, 87 Ind. 226 ; Williams v. Riley, 88 Ind. 290 ; Boyd v. Pfeifer, 95 Ind. 599 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 .

1882Eichbredt v. Angerman, 80 Ind. 208 .

21882–1885
Boyd v. Pfeifer green
ind · 1884
2 sentences

1885Eichbredt v. Angerman, 80 Ind. 208 ; Towell v. Hollweg, 81 Ind. 154 ; Feeney v. Mazelin, 87 Ind. 226 ; Williams v. Riley, 88 Ind. 290 ; Boyd v. Pfeifer, 95 Ind. 599 ; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 .

1885Boyd v. Pfeifer, 95 Ind. 599 ; McKee v. Hungate, 99 Ind. 168 ; Hinkle v. Shelley, 100 Ind. 88 .

21885–1885
Campbell v. Tomlinson neutral
ind · 1912
2 sentences

1939Eubank’s Manual of Practice (2d ed.) §138, p. 293; Campbell v. Tomlinson (1912), 178 Ind. 63, 66 , 98 N. E. 720 .

1939Eubank’s Manual of Practice (2d ed.) §138, p. 293; Campbell v. Tomlinson (1912), 178 Ind. 63, 66 , 98 N. E. 720 .

11939–1939
Hayes v. Johnson neutral
indctapp · 1914
1 sentence

1916Hayes v. Johnson (1914), 56 Ind, App. 238, 105 N. E. 164 ; Ditton v. Hart (1911), 175 Ind. 181 , 93 N. E. 961 ; Orten v. Tilden, supra. Finding no available error presented by the record, judgment is affirmed.

11916–1916
Gray v. Elzroth neutral
indctapp · 1894
2 sentences

1912Gray v. Elzroth (1894), 10 Ind. App. 587, 593 , 37 N. E. 551 , 53 Am.

1912Gray v. Elzroth (1894), 10 Ind. App. 587, 593 , 37 N. E. 551 , 53 Am.

11912–1912
Doty v. Patterson green
ind · 1900
1 sentence

1911Doty v. Patterson (1900), 155 Ind. 60 ; 2 Thornton’s Civil Code §462, pp. 997-999; Burns v. Trustees of Huntertown, etc., Church (1903), 31 Ind. App. 640 ; Government Bldg., etc., Inst. v. Richards (1903), 32 Ind. App. 24 ; Green v. Heaston (1900), 154 Ind. 127 ; Hubbard v. Bell (1892), 4 Ind. App. 180, 181 ; Louisville, etc., R.

11911–1911
Burns v. Trustees of Huntertown Cemetery Church neutral
indctapp · 1903
1 sentence

1911Doty v. Patterson (1900), 155 Ind. 60 ; 2 Thornton’s Civil Code §462, pp. 997-999; Burns v. Trustees of Huntertown, etc., Church (1903), 31 Ind. App. 640 ; Government Bldg., etc., Inst. v. Richards (1903), 32 Ind. App. 24 ; Green v. Heaston (1900), 154 Ind. 127 ; Hubbard v. Bell (1892), 4 Ind. App. 180, 181 ; Louisville, etc., R.

11911–1911
Government Building & Loan Institution v. Richards neutral
indctapp · 1903
1 sentence

1911Doty v. Patterson (1900), 155 Ind. 60 ; 2 Thornton’s Civil Code §462, pp. 997-999; Burns v. Trustees of Huntertown, etc., Church (1903), 31 Ind. App. 640 ; Government Bldg., etc., Inst. v. Richards (1903), 32 Ind. App. 24 ; Green v. Heaston (1900), 154 Ind. 127 ; Hubbard v. Bell (1892), 4 Ind. App. 180, 181 ; Louisville, etc., R.

11911–1911
Sheeks v. State ex rel. Alexander neutral
ind · 1901
1 sentence

1909Ewbank’s Manual §138; Starkey v. Starkey (1906), 166 Ind. 140 , and cases cited; Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663 , and cases cited; Bolt v. Ward (1901), 156 Ind. 382 , and cases cited; Sheeks v. State, ex rel. (1901), 156 Ind. 508, 509 ; Yeoman v. Schaeffer (1900), 155 Ind. 308, 311 , and cases cited; Earhart v. Farmers Creamery (1897), 148 Ind. 79, 80 ; In re Paskins (1900), 155 Ind. 173 ; Johnson v. Blair (1904), 32 Ind. App. 456 ; McCarty v. Snowbarger (1905), 35 Ind. App. 179 ; Indianapolis St.

11909–1909
McCarty v. Snowbarger neutral
indctapp · 1905
11909–1909
Johnson v. Blair neutral
indctapp · 1904
11909–1909
Crist v. Wayne International Building & Loan Ass'n neutral
ind · 1900
11906–1906
Grimes v. Grimes neutral
ind · 1895
11900–1900
Killian v. State ex rel. Spayd neutral
indctapp · 1896
11900–1900
Shick v. Citizens' Enterprise Co. green
indctapp · 1896
11900–1900
Board of Commissioners v. Fraser neutral
indctapp · 1898
11900–1900
Quick v. Brenner neutral
ind · 1885
11895–1895
Boyd v. Anderson neutral
ind · 1885
11895–1895
Douthit v. Douthit green
ind · 1892
11894–1894
Campbell v. Martin green
ind · 1882
11887–1887

Where else courts name it

IN 24 (1882–1939) OK 20 (1925–1997) AL 5 (1909–1926) NE 3 (1897–1914) WY 3 (1907–1932)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check