Campbell rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

Campbell rule in Texas

24 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1972–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (14)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. 15.65 Acres of Landgreen
ca9 · 1982 · cited in 9 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1994–2012
2 sentences

2012Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 (quoting United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 1332 (9th Cir.1982)) (emphasis added).

2010The Schmidt court held that the “Campbell rule” should control unless the condemnee can show: (1) the land taken from the condemnee landowner was indispensable to the ... project; (2) the land taken constituted a substantial (not inconsequential) part of the tract devoted to the project; and (3) the damages resulting to the land not taken from the use of the land taken were inseparable from those to the same land flowing from the condemnor government’s use of its adjoining land in the ... project. *294 Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 (quoting United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 133

99
State v. Schmidtgreen
tex · 1994 · cited in 7 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1994–2012
2 sentences

2012See Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 .

2010The Schmidt court held that the “Campbell rule” should control unless the condemnee can show: (1) the land taken from the condemnee landowner was indispensable to the ... project; (2) the land taken constituted a substantial (not inconsequential) part of the tract devoted to the project; and (3) the damages resulting to the land not taken from the use of the land taken were inseparable from those to the same land flowing from the condemnor government’s use of its adjoining land in the ... project. *294 Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 (quoting United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 133

57
Monreal v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2003 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012See Monreal v. State , 99 S.W.3d 615, 620 (Tex. Crim.

2012See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 620 (Tex. Crim.

22
Dinwiddie v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1996 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See id.

2003See id.

22
Ex Parte Crenshawgreen
texapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026See id.

11
Lopez v. Hurongreen
texapp · 2016 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025PRAC. & REM. § 82.001(2) (defining “products liability action” to encompass any action against a seller allegedly caused by a defective product based on negligence); Lopez, 490 S.W.3d at 521 (whether a claim is a products liability action is a matter of statutory construction that we review de novo); see also Toyota Indus.

11
Timothy Scott Weeks v. Stategreen
texapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019See Weeks v. State, 396 S.W.3d 737 , 744–45 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2013, pet. ref’d) (rejecting a fair-cross-section challenge to an e-jury system based on lack of statistical evidence).10 We remain mindful of the cherished values of equality and impartiality, and we are not unsympathetic to Campbell’s claim that those values were mislaid in her venire.

11
Acadia Healthcare Co. v. Horizon Health Corp.green
texapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017See 472 S.W.3d at 97-98 (analyzing the Gore/Campbell factors globally rather than on a defendant-by-defendant basis).

11
Interstate Northborough Partnership v. Stategreen
tex · 2001 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012Santikos, 144 S.W.3d at 463 ; Interstate Northborough P’ship v. State, 66 S.W.3d 213, 219 (Tex.2001); Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 .

2012Santikos, 144 S.W.3d at 463 ; Interstate Northborough P’ship v. State, 66 S.W.3d 213, 219 (Tex.2001); Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 .

11
Knoll v. Neblettgreen
texapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See Knoll, 966 S.W.2d at 639 . 4 .

2001See Knoll, 966 S.W.2d at 639 . 4 .

11
United States v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., a Corporationgreen
ca9 · 1961 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 1332 (9th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 793 (1983); accord, United States v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., 293 F.2d 822 (9th Cir.1961).

1994United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 1332 (9th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 793 (1983); accord, United States v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., 293 F.2d 822 (9th Cir.1961).

11
Ex Parte Ramosgreen
texcrimapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992Ex parte Ramos, 806 S.W.2d 845, 847 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).

11
Black v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
1 sentence

1989First, there is Judge Campbell’s analysis in a footnote to Black v. State, 723 S.W.2d 674, 676 (Tex.Crim.App.1986): “[I]f the record indicated some basis for rejecting the evidence of the [defendant’s] guilt as a [primary actor,] i.e., if the State argued that [Defendant] was guilty as a party or if there was conflicting evidence of [Defendant’s] guilt as a [primary actor,]” then “some harm” could be predicated on the *568 trial court’s failure to apply the law to the facts.

11
Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Ponsford Bros.green
tex · 1968 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1972–1972
1 sentence

1972Co. v. Ponsford Brothers, 423 S.W.2d 571, 575 (Tex.Sup.1968), “A jury may not be called upon to construe the legal effect of an instrument.” Considering all of the facts and circumstances in evidence and applying the rules of law heretofore noted, we are of the opinion that it was not error for the trial court to peremptorily instruct the jury to return a verdict in favor of NBC and against all of the appellants. -This holding does not, however, dispose of Campbell’s claim for indemnity against Parks-Worldwide.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Fisherman v. United States green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

1996Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 (quoting United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 1332 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 793 (1983)).

1996Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 (quoting United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 1332 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 793 (1983)).

41994–1996
Aviles v. United States green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

1996Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 (quoting United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 1332 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 793 (1983)).

1996Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 (quoting United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 1332 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 793 (1983)).

41994–1996
Marrale v. United States green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

1996Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 (quoting United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 1332 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 793 (1983)).

1996Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 (quoting United States v. 15.65 Acres of Land, 689 F.2d 1329, 1332 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 793 (1983)).

41994–1996
Campbell v. United States green
scotus · 1924
2 sentences

2012The court in Schmidt referred to this as the Campbell rule, after Campbell v. United States, 266 U.S. 368 , 45 S.Ct. 115 , 69 L.Ed. 328 (1924).

2012The court in Schmidt referred to this as the Campbell rule, after Campbell v. United States, 266 U.S. 368 , 45 S.Ct. 115 , 69 L.Ed. 328 (1924).

31996–2012
Campbell v. State green
texcrimapp · 1999
2 sentences

2016Campbell 5 S.W.3d at 696-97 . 14 In this case, it appears from the record that a total of three checks were involved, number 108 for $400, number 113 for $400, and number 115 for $600.

2016Campbell 5 S.W.3d at 696-97 . 14 In this case, it appears from the record that a total of three checks were involved, number 108 for $400, number 113 for $400, and number 115 for $600.

12016–2016
Sims v. Fitzpatrick green
texapp · 2009
1 sentence

2014Id.

12014–2014
County of Bexar v. Santikos green
tex · 2004
2 sentences

2012Santikos, 144 S.W.3d at 463 ; Interstate Northborough P’ship v. State, 66 S.W.3d 213, 219 (Tex.2001); Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 .

2012Santikos, 144 S.W.3d at 463 ; Interstate Northborough P’ship v. State, 66 S.W.3d 213, 219 (Tex.2001); Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d at 778 .

12012–2012
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Campbell green
scotus · 2003
2 sentences

2005On the remainder of the Campbell factors, however, the harm was economic and did not “evince a reckless disregard of the health or safety of others.” See Campbell, 538 U.S. at 419 , 123 S.Ct. 1513 .

2005On the remainder of the Campbell factors, however, the harm was economic and did not “evince a reckless disregard of the health or safety of others.” See Campbell, 538 U.S. at 419 , 123 S.Ct. 1513 .

12005–2005
Sorokolit v. Rhodes green
tex · 1994
2 sentences

1997Sorokolit, 889 S.W.2d at 243 .

1997Sorokolit, 889 S.W.2d at 243 .

11997–1997
Blockburger v. United States green
scotus · 1931
2 sentences

1992As such, we will address points one and two together, relying on both federal and state authority in disposing of Campbell’s claim. 2 In reviewing a double jeopardy claim, the test enunciated in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), is generally the first step in our analysis.

1992As such, we will address points one and two together, relying on both federal and state authority in disposing of Campbell’s claim. 2 In reviewing a double jeopardy claim, the test enunciated in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), is generally the first step in our analysis.

11992–1992
Johnson v. State green
texcrimapp · 1987
1 sentence

1989Then there is Johnson , where the court held the error in refusing to apply the law of parties to the facts was harmful “because that was the theory of prosecution best supported by the evidence and most fervently advanced before the jury in the State’s final argument.” Johnson, 739 S.W.2d at 305 .

11989–1989

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Prop. Code § 21.042 (7)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 24 (1972–2026) OH 22 (1990–2026) FL 17 (1982–2025) CA 12 (1988–2026) GA 11 (1993–2025) IN 9 (1992–2018) KS 9 (2005–2026) OR 8 (1926–2011) WA 7 (1969–2018) PA 7 (1976–2023) IA 7 (2014–2020) AL 6 (1994–2017) AZ 5 (1987–2020) LA 5 (1983–2002) SC 5 (2004–2025) MD 4 (1978–2005) ID 4 (1976–2026) IL 4 (1989–2022) VA 3 (1993–2018) ME 3 (2001–2022) KY 2 (2018–2023) NE 2 (1995–2019) MS 2 (2012–2016) MN 2 (1990–2018) MA 2 (1977–2003) NM 2 (1983–2016) WI 2 (1977–2006) NY 2 (1996–2026) CO 2 (1978–2021) AR 2 (1910–2023) MO 2 (2011–2025) UT 2 (2001–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check