Campbell standard (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

Campbell standard in Louisiana

5 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2002 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Campbell green
la · 1996
2 sentences

2002However, in State v. Campbell, 95-1409 (La.3/22/96), 670 So.2d 1212 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that it did not need to reconsider the continuing validity of its Mayeux decision in light of the federal district court decision in Mayeux v. Belt , finding that in convicting the Campbell defendants of attempted jury tampering, the jury had not convicted them of a non-crime, as had been the case in Mayeux.

2002However, in State v. Campbell, 95-1409 (La.3/22/96), 670 So.2d 1212 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that it did not need to reconsider the continuing validity of its Mayeux decision in light of the federal district court decision in Mayeux v. Belt , finding that in convicting the Campbell defendants of attempted jury tampering, the jury had not convicted them of a non-crime, as had been the case in Mayeux.

12002–2002
Townsend v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. green
lactapp · 2001
1 sentence

2001Thus, we reason as the Townsend court did, 793 So.2d at 478 , that resolution of this case hinges on whether the term "repair" encompasses Campbell's claim for diminished value.

12001–2001
State v. Washington green
lactapp · 1993
2 sentences

1996As in Washington, 614 So.2d 242 , the trial judge did not specifically mention on the record that he applied the "thirteenth juror" standard in evaluating Campbell's motion.

1996As in Washington, 614 So.2d 242 , the trial judge did not specifically mention on the record that he applied the "thirteenth juror" standard in evaluating Campbell's motion.

11996–1996
State v. Campbell neutral
lactapp · 1995
1 sentence

1996In our prior opinion, State v. Campbell, 94-1140 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/95) ; 651 So.2d 412 , we determined that the trial court erred in denying Campbell's motion to quash the indictment on the basis that he, a white man, lacked standing to claim discriminatory treatment of blacks in the selection of grand jury foremen in Evangeline Parish.

11996–1996
Semien v. PPG Industries, Inc. green
lactapp · 1982
2 sentences

1985In Semien v. PPG Industries, Inc., 413 So.2d 956 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1982), this court noted that in cases tried before a judge alone, as in the present case, the rule of Campbell is inappropriate.

1985In Semien v. PPG Industries, Inc., 413 So.2d 956 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1982), this court noted that in cases tried before a judge alone, as in the present case, the rule of Campbell is inappropriate.

11985–1985
Theriot v. St. Martin Parish School Bd. neutral
lactapp · 1983
2 sentences

1983Martin Parish School Board, et al., 434 So.2d 668 , a case from this court involving a like issue, this court stated: “The application of the ‘preponderence of the evidence’ rule by the trial court was error.

1983Martin Parish School Board, et al., 434 So.2d 668 , a case from this court involving a like issue, this court stated: “The application of the ‘preponderence of the evidence’ rule by the trial court was error.

11983–1983

Where else courts name it

TX 24 (1972–2026) OH 22 (1990–2026) FL 17 (1982–2025) CA 12 (1988–2026) GA 11 (1993–2025) IN 9 (1992–2018) KS 9 (2005–2026) OR 8 (1926–2011) WA 7 (1969–2018) PA 7 (1976–2023) IA 7 (2014–2020) AL 6 (1994–2017) AZ 5 (1987–2020) LA 5 (1983–2002) SC 5 (2004–2025) MD 4 (1978–2005) ID 4 (1976–2026) IL 4 (1989–2022) VA 3 (1993–2018) ME 3 (2001–2022) KY 2 (2018–2023) NE 2 (1995–2019) MS 2 (2012–2016) MN 2 (1990–2018) MA 2 (1977–2003) NM 2 (1983–2016) WI 2 (1977–2006) NY 2 (1996–2026) CO 2 (1978–2021) AR 2 (1910–2023) MO 2 (2011–2025) UT 2 (2001–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check