impossible standard (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

impossible standard in Pennsylvania

23 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1971–2025 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
Irvin v. Dowdgreen
scotus · 1961 · cited in 12 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1971–2024
2 sentences

2024“To hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror’s impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard.” Id. at 723 , 81 S.Ct. 1639 .

2024“To hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror’s impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard.” Id. at 723 , 81 S.Ct. 1639 .

412
Commonwealth v. Richardsongreen
pa · 1978 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1978–1980
2 sentences

1980It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.” See also Commonwealth v. Sutton, 485 Pa. 47 , 400 A.2d 1305 (1979); Commonwealth v. Casper, supra; Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571 , 383 A.2d 510 (1978).

1980It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.” See also Commonwealth v. Sutton, 485 Pa. 47 , 400 A.2d 1305 (1979); Commonwealth v. Casper, supra; Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571 , 383 A.2d 510 (1978).

23
Gravinese v. Johns-Manville Corp.green
pa · 1984 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1984–1986
2 sentences

1986See Gravinese v. Johns-Manville, 324 Pa.Super. 432, 436 , 471 A.2d 1233, 1237 (1984).

1986See Gravinese v. Johns-Manville, 324 Pa.Super. 432, 436 , 471 A.2d 1233, 1237 (1984).

22
United States v. George Keith Williamsgreen
ca5 · 1978 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1978–1979
2 sentences

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ “See also, e. g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.' "See also, e.g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

22
Mitzelfelt v. Kamringreen
pa · 1990 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2014–2025
2 sentences

2025These are the cases in which, irrespective of the quality of the medical treatment, a certain percentage of patients will suffer harm.” Mitzelfelt v. Kamrin, 584 A.2d at 888, 892 (Pa. 1990).

2014Id. (emphasis in original). 3 Following Mitzelfelt , in Billman v. Saylor, 761 A.2d 1208 (Pa.Super.2000), which only dealt with whether an increased risk of harm case was properly made out sufficient to go to the jury, the court adopted the “impossible standard” language in describing when an increased risk of harm instruction is appropriate: In Mitzelfelt, supra, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court explained that in some cases, the standard of proof regarding medical expert testimony is an impossible standard.

12
Commonwealth v. Powellgreen
pa · 1974 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1978–1979
2 sentences

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ “See also, e. g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ “See also, e. g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

12
Webber v. Shelleygreen
ca9 · 2003 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015We agree with the Commonwealth Court’s finding that the mere possibility of error cannot bar the use of a voting system as “the unfortunate reality is that the possibility of electoral fraud can never be completely eliminated, no matter which type of ballot is used.” Banfield III, 442 M.D. 2006, at *8 (citing Weber v. Shelley, 347 F.3d 1101, 1106-107 (9th Cir. 2003) (emphasis in original)).

11
Commonwealth v. Martingreen
pa · 1975 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
2 sentences

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.” Commonwealth v. Martin, 465 Pa. 134, 149 , 348 A.2d 391, 399 (1975), quoting Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 , 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751, 756 (1961). 5 .

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.” Commonwealth v. Martin, 465 Pa. 134, 149 , 348 A.2d 391, 399 (1975), quoting Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 , 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751, 756 (1961). 5 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Commonwealth v. Martinolich green
pa · 1974
2 sentences

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ “See also, e. g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ “See also, e. g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

21978–1979
Phelps v. United States green
scotus · 1974
2 sentences

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ “See also, e. g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.' "See also, e.g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

21978–1979
District of Columbia v. Walters green
scotus · 1974
2 sentences

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ “See also, e. g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

1979It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.' "See also, e.g., Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571, 578 , 383 A.2d 510, 514 (1978); Commonwealth v. Powell, supra, 459 Pa. at 260 , 328 A.2d at 511 ; Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 147-48 , 318 A.2d 680, 687 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); see generally United States v. Williams, 568 F.2d 464, 467-68 (5th Cir. 1978).

21978–1979
Banfield, Aplts. v. Secretary of the Com green
pa · 2015
2 sentences

2021The Supreme Court characterized the electors’ argument as “advocating that the DREs be held to an impossible standard of invulnerability.” Id. at 174 .

2021Thus, the Election Code does not require “an impossible standard of invulnerability” or “impose a requirement that cannot be achieved.” Id.

12021–2021
Billman v. Saylor green
pasuperct · 2000
1 sentence

2014Id. (emphasis in original). 3 Following Mitzelfelt , in Billman v. Saylor, 761 A.2d 1208 (Pa.Super.2000), which only dealt with whether an increased risk of harm case was properly made out sufficient to go to the jury, the court adopted the “impossible standard” language in describing when an increased risk of harm instruction is appropriate: In Mitzelfelt, supra, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court explained that in some cases, the standard of proof regarding medical expert testimony is an impossible standard.

12014–2014
Miller v. Sacred Heart Hospital green
pasuperct · 2000
1 sentence

2000Miller, supra. ¶ 9 In Mitzelfelt, supra, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court explained that in some cases, the standard of proof regarding medical expert testimony is an impossible standard.

12000–2000
Commonwealth v. Casper green
pa · 1978
2 sentences

1986It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.” Commonwealth v. Casper, supra, 481 Pa. at 152 , 392 A.2d at 292 , quoting Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 722-723 , 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751, 756 (1961).

1986It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.” Commonwealth v. Casper, supra, 481 Pa. at 152 , 392 A.2d at 292 , quoting Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 722-723 , 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751, 756 (1961).

11986–1986
Schwarzbach v. Dunn green
pasuperct · 1977
2 sentences

1980Commonwealth v. Hoss, 469 Pa. 195 , 364 A.2d 1335 (1976); Schwarzbach v. Dunn, 252 Pa.Super. 454 , 381 A.2d 1295 (1977).

1980Commonwealth v. Hoss, 469 Pa. 195 , 364 A.2d 1335 (1976); Schwarzbach v. Dunn, 252 Pa.Super. 454 , 381 A.2d 1295 (1977).

11980–1980
Commonwealth v. Hoss green
pa · 1976
2 sentences

1980Commonwealth v. Hoss, 469 Pa. 195 , 364 A.2d 1335 (1976); Schwarzbach v. Dunn, 252 Pa.Super. 454 , 381 A.2d 1295 (1977).

1980Commonwealth v. Hoss, 469 Pa. 195 , 364 A.2d 1335 (1976); Schwarzbach v. Dunn, 252 Pa.Super. 454 , 381 A.2d 1295 (1977).

11980–1980
Commonwealth v. Sutton green
pa · 1979
2 sentences

1980It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.” See also Commonwealth v. Sutton, 485 Pa. 47 , 400 A.2d 1305 (1979); Commonwealth v. Casper, supra; Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571 , 383 A.2d 510 (1978).

1980It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.” See also Commonwealth v. Sutton, 485 Pa. 47 , 400 A.2d 1305 (1979); Commonwealth v. Casper, supra; Commonwealth v. Richardson, 476 Pa. 571 , 383 A.2d 510 (1978).

11980–1980

Where else courts name it

AL 74 (1914–2014) CA 61 (1981–2026) IL 24 (1903–2025) PA 23 (1971–2025) TN 20 (1875–2021) IN 16 (1969–2020) GA 12 (1979–1991) TX 10 (1984–2019) LA 8 (1982–2022) OK 7 (1969–2023) MO 7 (1987–2024) AZ 7 (1968–2021) NY 6 (1960–2022) FL 6 (1977–2008) WI 5 (1964–2005) IA 5 (1978–2018) VA 4 (1998–2023) ID 4 (1973–2004) MI 4 (1997–2024) CO 4 (1983–2025) NH 3 (1974–2010) MD 3 (1981–2003) NC 3 (1890–1993) NJ 3 (1980–1988) MN 3 (2024–2024) WV 3 (1980–2000) WY 3 (1979–1989) MT 3 (1999–2013) ND 3 (1980–1989) NV 3 (1967–1994) KY 2 (2021–2022) HI 2 (1989–2020) OH 2 (2017–2020) NE 2 (1979–1981) VT 2 (2010–2013) CT 2 (1987–1989) WA 2 (2002–2002)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check