Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Irvin v. Dowdgreen2 sentences2015See Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 (1961) (“To hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of . . . impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. 2014See Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 (1961) (“To hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. | 3 | 3 |
Isadore Blumenfield v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Monte Perkins v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1978It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ ” Later the Rizzo , court, 304 F.2d at 817 , set out the proper time to determine if the jury was fair and impartial by quoting from Blumenfield v. United States, 284 F.2d 46, 51 (8 Cir. 1960), where the court stated: “ ‘* * * The ultimate question is whether it is possible to select a fair and impartial jury, and the proper occasion for such a determination is upon the voir dire examination. * * *.’” For a more recent holding approving of the Irvin v. Dowd hold | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In RE the Marriage of Kenneth R. Michael and Melissa J. Michael Upon the Petition of Kenneth R. Michael
green
1 sentence2018Randall complains this permanency standard can never be met because crop prices obviously fluctuate and “have never been, nor will ever be permanent.” As noted above, the proper standard is that “[a] substantial change justifying a modification must be permanent or continuous rather than temporary in nature.” Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Murphy v. Florida
green
2 sentences1978It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ ” Later the Rizzo , court, 304 F.2d at 817 , set out the proper time to determine if the jury was fair and impartial by quoting from Blumenfield v. United States, 284 F.2d 46, 51 (8 Cir. 1960), where the court stated: “ ‘* * * The ultimate question is whether it is possible to select a fair and impartial jury, and the proper occasion for such a determination is upon the voir dire examination. * * *.’” For a more recent holding approving of the Irvin v. Dowd hold 1978It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ ” Later the Rizzo , court, 304 F.2d at 817 , set out the proper time to determine if the jury was fair and impartial by quoting from Blumenfield v. United States, 284 F.2d 46, 51 (8 Cir. 1960), where the court stated: “ ‘* * * The ultimate question is whether it is possible to select a fair and impartial jury, and the proper occasion for such a determination is upon the voir dire examination. * * *.’” For a more recent holding approving of the Irvin v. Dowd hold | 1 | 1978–1978 |
August Tom Rizzo v. United States of America, Ruby Nafie v. United States
green
1 sentence1978It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.’ ” Later the Rizzo , court, 304 F.2d at 817 , set out the proper time to determine if the jury was fair and impartial by quoting from Blumenfield v. United States, 284 F.2d 46, 51 (8 Cir. 1960), where the court stated: “ ‘* * * The ultimate question is whether it is possible to select a fair and impartial jury, and the proper occasion for such a determination is upon the voir dire examination. * * *.’” For a more recent holding approving of the Irvin v. Dowd hold | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.