Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Murphy v. Floridagreen2 sentences1982Murphy v. Florida, 421 U.S. 794 , 95 S.Ct. 2031 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975). "`To hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. 1982Murphy v. Florida, 421 U.S. 794 , 95 S.Ct. 2031 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975). "`To hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Irvin v. Dowd
red
2 sentences2009It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence present in court.’ ” Murphy v. Florida, 421 U.S. 794, 800 , 95 S.Ct. 2031, 2036 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975)(quoting Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 , 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642-43 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961)). 2009It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence present in court.’ ” Murphy v. Florida, 421 U.S. 794, 800 , 95 S.Ct. 2031, 2036 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975)(quoting Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 , 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642-43 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961)). | 3 | 1982–2009 |
Herring v. BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOL
green
1 sentence2022A teacher or coach, however, is not the insurer of the safety of students in all circumstances and is not held to the impossible standard of exercising constant supervision over each student involved in a group activity. 632 So. 2d at 921 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Hunter v. Caddo Parish School Bd.
green
1 sentence1994Hunter v. Caddo Parish School Bd., 627 So.2d 772 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1993); Ferguson v. DeSoto Parish School Bd., 467 So.2d 1257 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985), writ denied; Green v. Orleans Parish School Bd., 365 So.2d 834 (La.App. 4th Cir.1978), writ denied. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Ferguson v. DeSoto Parish School Bd.
neutral
1 sentence1994Hunter v. Caddo Parish School Bd., 627 So.2d 772 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1993); Ferguson v. DeSoto Parish School Bd., 467 So.2d 1257 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985), writ denied; Green v. Orleans Parish School Bd., 365 So.2d 834 (La.App. 4th Cir.1978), writ denied. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Green v. Orleans Parish School Bd.
green
1 sentence1994Hunter v. Caddo Parish School Bd., 627 So.2d 772 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1993); Ferguson v. DeSoto Parish School Bd., 467 So.2d 1257 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985), writ denied; Green v. Orleans Parish School Bd., 365 So.2d 834 (La.App. 4th Cir.1978), writ denied. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Kahey
green
1 sentence1993Our Supreme Court in State v. Kahey, 436 So.2d 475 (La.1983), stated, "to hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Clark
neutral
1 sentence1983State v. Clark, 434 So.2d 404 (La.1983). [3] In so doing the First Circuit found "[n]o error shown in the ruling complained of; reserving however to defendant the right to reurge a change of venue motion at the completion of the voir dire examination only before the first witness is sworn." [4] To hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.