Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
23 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re AIU Insurance Co.green2 sentences2018Co., 148 S.W.3d at 115, 116 (holding arbitration agreement “another type of forum- selection clause” and “no meaningful distinction between this type of forum- selection clause and arbitration clauses”)). 2016Co., 148 S.W.3d at 113 (holding arbitration agreement “another type of forum-selection clause” and “no meaningful distinction between this type of forum-selection clause and arbitration clauses”)); see also Haynsworth v. The Corp., 121 F.3d 956, 963 (5th Cir. 1997) (applying law of arbitration clauses to forum-selection clauses); Deep Water Slender Wells, Ltd., 234 S.W.3d at 688 ; St. | 10 | 10 |
In Re Automated Collection Technologies, Inc.green2 sentences2009See In re Automated Collection Technologies, Inc., 156 S.W.3d 557, 559 (Tex. 2004) (per curiam) (orig. proceeding); AIU Ins., 148 S.W.3d at 115, 116 . 2005See In re AIU Ins., 148 S.W.3d at 116, 121 ; see also In re Automated, Techs., Inc., 156 S.W.3d at 559 (noting that In re AIU Insurance court, in considering whether right to rely on forum-selection clause had been waived, “relied on cases concerning waiver in the arbitration context, which we found to be analogous.”). | 3 | 3 |
In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.green2 sentences2018See In re FirstMerit Bank, 52 S.W.3d 749, 755 (Tex. 2001); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 741 (Tex. 2005) (analysis applied to arbitration provisions, which are a type of forum selection clause). 2016Under direct-benefits estoppel, a “non-signatory who is seeking the benefits of a contract or seeking to enforce it ‘is estopped from simultaneously attempting to avoid the contract’s burdens.’ ” Rachal, 403 S.W.3d at 846 (citing In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 739 (Tex. 2005)). | 2 | 2 |
Accelerated Christian Education, Inc. v. Oracle Corp.green2 sentences2001"When a party contractually consents to the jurisdiction of a particular state, that state has jurisdiction over that party as long as the agreed-to state will enforce the type of forum selection clause signed by the parties." Accelerated Christian Educ., Inc. v. Oracle Corp. , 925 S.W.2d 66, 72 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1996, no writ). 2000"When a party contractually consents to the jurisdiction of a particular state, that state has jurisdiction over that party as long as the agreed-to state will enforce the type of forum selection clause signed by the parties." Accelerated Christian Educ., Inc. v. Oracle Corp., 925 S.W.2d 66, 72 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1996, no writ). | 2 | 2 |
Barnette v. United Research Co.green2 sentences1996See Barnette, 823 S.W.2d at 370 ; see also Greenwood, 857 S.W.2d at 656 . 1996See Barnette, 823 S.W.2d at 370 ; see also Greenwood, 857 S.W.2d at 656 . | 2 | 2 |
Greenwood v. Tillamook Country Smoker, Inc.green2 sentences2001Greenwood v. Tillamook Country Smoker, Inc., 857 S.W.2d 654 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no writ). 1996See Barnette, 823 S.W.2d at 370 ; see also Greenwood, 857 S.W.2d at 656 . | 1 | 2 |
In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.green1 sentence2018See In re FirstMerit Bank, 52 S.W.3d 749, 755 (Tex. 2001); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 741 (Tex. 2005) (analysis applied to arbitration provisions, which are a type of forum selection clause). | 1 | 1 |
In Re AutoNation, Inc.green1 sentence2017See In re AutoNation, Inc., 228 S.W.3d 663, 668 (Tex. 2007) (citing In re AIU Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Haynsworth v. the Corporationgreen1 sentence2016Co., 148 S.W.3d at 113 (holding arbitration agreement “another type of forum-selection clause” and “no meaningful distinction between this type of forum-selection clause and arbitration clauses”)); see also Haynsworth v. The Corp., 121 F.3d 956, 963 (5th Cir. 1997) (applying law of arbitration clauses to forum-selection clauses); Deep Water Slender Wells, Ltd., 234 S.W.3d at 688 ; St. | 1 | 1 |
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shutegreen2 sentences2015Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 , 589– 90, 111 S. Ct. 1522, 1525 (1991); 3 Baker Hughes Inc. v. Brooks, 405 S.W.3d 246, 249 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, pet. denied); RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, 309 S.W.3d 686, 704 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.); see also Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 , 472 n.14, 105 S. Ct. 2174 , 2182 3 Congress later abrogated the type of forum-selection clause at issue in Carnival Cruise Lines; however, the Court’s holdings regarding the construction and effect of valid and enforceable forum-selection clauses remain. 2015Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 , 589– 90, 111 S. Ct. 1522, 1525 (1991); 3 Baker Hughes Inc. v. Brooks, 405 S.W.3d 246, 249 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, pet. denied); RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, 309 S.W.3d 686, 704 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.); see also Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 , 472 n.14, 105 S. Ct. 2174 , 2182 3 Congress later abrogated the type of forum-selection clause at issue in Carnival Cruise Lines; however, the Court’s holdings regarding the construction and effect of valid and enforceable forum-selection clauses remain. | 1 | 1 |
RSR Corp. v. Siegmundgreen1 sentence2015Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 , 589– 90, 111 S. Ct. 1522, 1525 (1991); 3 Baker Hughes Inc. v. Brooks, 405 S.W.3d 246, 249 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, pet. denied); RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, 309 S.W.3d 686, 704 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.); see also Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 , 472 n.14, 105 S. Ct. 2174 , 2182 3 Congress later abrogated the type of forum-selection clause at issue in Carnival Cruise Lines; however, the Court’s holdings regarding the construction and effect of valid and enforceable forum-selection clauses remain. | 1 | 1 |
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewiczgreen2 sentences2015Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 , 589– 90, 111 S. Ct. 1522, 1525 (1991); 3 Baker Hughes Inc. v. Brooks, 405 S.W.3d 246, 249 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, pet. denied); RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, 309 S.W.3d 686, 704 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.); see also Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 , 472 n.14, 105 S. Ct. 2174 , 2182 3 Congress later abrogated the type of forum-selection clause at issue in Carnival Cruise Lines; however, the Court’s holdings regarding the construction and effect of valid and enforceable forum-selection clauses remain. 2015Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 , 589– 90, 111 S. Ct. 1522, 1525 (1991); 3 Baker Hughes Inc. v. Brooks, 405 S.W.3d 246, 249 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, pet. denied); RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, 309 S.W.3d 686, 704 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.); see also Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 , 472 n.14, 105 S. Ct. 2174 , 2182 3 Congress later abrogated the type of forum-selection clause at issue in Carnival Cruise Lines; however, the Court’s holdings regarding the construction and effect of valid and enforceable forum-selection clauses remain. | 1 | 1 |
Baker Hughes Inc. v. Brooksgreen1 sentence2015Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 , 589– 90, 111 S. Ct. 1522, 1525 (1991); 3 Baker Hughes Inc. v. Brooks, 405 S.W.3d 246, 249 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, pet. denied); RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, 309 S.W.3d 686, 704 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.); see also Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 , 472 n.14, 105 S. Ct. 2174 , 2182 3 Congress later abrogated the type of forum-selection clause at issue in Carnival Cruise Lines; however, the Court’s holdings regarding the construction and effect of valid and enforceable forum-selection clauses remain. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Adm Investor Services, Inc.green1 sentence2012See, e.g. , ADM Investor Servs. , 304 S.W.3d at 374 ; AIU Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Vimar Seguros Y Reaseguros, S. A. v. M/V Sky Reefergreen2 sentences2009Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 134-35 (Tex.2004) (holding that determination of enforceability of forum-selection and arbitration clauses is the same when a party alleges fraudulent inducement); see also Vimar Seguros y Reasegu-ros, S.A v. M/V Sky Reefer, 515 U.S. 528, 534 , 115 S.Ct. 2322 , 132 L.Ed.2d 462 (1995) (observing that arbitration provisions are a subset of forum-selection clauses). 2009Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 134-35 (Tex.2004) (holding that determination of enforceability of forum-selection and arbitration clauses is the same when a party alleges fraudulent inducement); see also Vimar Seguros y Reasegu-ros, S.A v. M/V Sky Reefer, 515 U.S. 528, 534 , 115 S.Ct. 2322 , 132 L.Ed.2d 462 (1995) (observing that arbitration provisions are a subset of forum-selection clauses). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of Americagreen1 sentence2009Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 134-35 (Tex.2004) (holding that determination of enforceability of forum-selection and arbitration clauses is the same when a party alleges fraudulent inducement); see also Vimar Seguros y Reasegu-ros, S.A v. M/V Sky Reefer, 515 U.S. 528, 534 , 115 S.Ct. 2322 , 132 L.Ed.2d 462 (1995) (observing that arbitration provisions are a subset of forum-selection clauses). | 1 | 1 |
Air Economy Corp. v. Aero-Flow Dynamicsgreen1 sentence1991Air Economy Corp. v. Aero-Flow Dynamics, Inc., 122 NJ.Super. 456, 300 A.2d 856, 857 (1973) (per curiam). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.
green
1 sentence2020Fund, 464 F.3d at 517–18 (similar). 3 See, e.g., Weekley Homes, 180 S.W.3d at 130–35 (citing federal authority upwards of forty-five times). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Hellenic Investment Fund, Inc. v. Det Norske Veritas
green
1 sentence2020Fund, 464 F.3d at 517–18 (similar). 3 See, e.g., Weekley Homes, 180 S.W.3d at 130–35 (citing federal authority upwards of forty-five times). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Guam Industrial Services, Inc. v. Dresser-Rand Co.
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Hal Rachal, Jr. v. John W. Reitz
green
1 sentence2016Under direct-benefits estoppel, a “non-signatory who is seeking the benefits of a contract or seeking to enforce it ‘is estopped from simultaneously attempting to avoid the contract’s burdens.’ ” Rachal, 403 S.W.3d at 846 (citing In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 739 (Tex. 2005)). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Deep Water Slender Wells, Ltd. v. Shell International Exploration & Production, Inc.
green
1 sentence2016Co., 148 S.W.3d at 113 (holding arbitration agreement “another type of forum-selection clause” and “no meaningful distinction between this type of forum-selection clause and arbitration clauses”)); see also Haynsworth v. The Corp., 121 F.3d 956, 963 (5th Cir. 1997) (applying law of arbitration clauses to forum-selection clauses); Deep Water Slender Wells, Ltd., 234 S.W.3d at 688 ; St. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of Turkmenistan
green
1 sentence2014But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has pointed out, direct-benefits estoppel is “seriously consider[ed]” only when “the nonsignatory had brought suit against a signatory premised in part upon the agreement.” Bridas, 345 F.3d at 10 We look to cases applying direct-benefits estoppel in the context of arbitration clauses because arbitration clauses are a type of forum-selection clause. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.