Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
22 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1982–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
N.D.T. v. Stategreen2 sentences1993The weighing and balancing of the six statutory factors in determining whether to transfer a juvenile to circuit court for adult prosecution "does not involve the mere tallying of the circumstances for numerical comparison." A.M., 623 So.2d at 426 ; see also N.D.T. v. State, 592 So.2d 647 (Ala.Crim.App.1991). 1993The weighing and balancing of the six statutory factors in determining whether to transfer a juvenile to circuit court for adult prosecution “does not involve the mere tallying of the circumstances for numerical comparison.” A.M., 623 So.2d at 426 ; see also N.D.T. v. State, 592 So.2d 647 (Ala.Crim.App.1991). | 7 | 8 |
AWM v. Stategreen2 sentences1993It is equally as clear that the judge did not base the transfer order solely on the nature of the offense, see A.W.M. v. State, 627 So.2d at 1152 ("[t]he decision to transfer a juvenile for prosecution as an adult may not be based solely on the nature of the offense") (emphasis in original), but, instead considered each of the six statutory factors, as well as other relevant circumstances, as required by § 12-15-34(d). 1993It is equally as clear that the judge did not base the transfer order solely on the nature of the offense, see A.W.M. v. State, 627 So.2d at 1152 (“[t]he decision to transfer a juvenile for prosecution as an adult may not be based solely on the nature of the offense”) (emphasis in original), but, instead considered each of the six statutory factors, as well as other relevant circumstances, as required by § 12-15-34(d). | 2 | 2 |
Clisby v. Stategreen2 sentences1991There was also evidence that the appellant was a member of the Vice Lords, a juvenile gang. *650 Like the weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in a deciding whether the death penalty should be imposed, the weighing of the six statutory factors and other considerations in determining whether a juvenile should be transferred from the juvenile court to the circuit court for criminal prosecution as an adult does not involve "a mere tallying of [the] circumstances for the purpose of numerical comparison." Clisby v. State, 456 So.2d 99, 102 (Ala.Cr.App.), affirmed, 456 So.2d 105 (Ala 1991Like the weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in a deciding whether the death penalty should be imposed, the weighing of the six statutory factors and other considerations in determining whether a juvenile should be transferred from the juvenile court to the circuit court for criminal prosecution as an adult does not involve “a mere tallying of [the] circumstances for the purpose of numerical comparison.” Clisby v. State, 456 So.2d 99, 102 (Ala.Cr.App.), affirmed, 456 So.2d 105 (Ala.1983), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1009 , 105 S.Ct. 1372 , 84 L.Ed.2d 391 (1985). | 2 | 2 |
Sanborn v. Stategreen2 sentences1990See Sanborn v. State, 421 So.2d 1373, 1375 (Ala.Cr.App.1982). 1990See Sanborn v. State, 421 So.2d 1373, 1375 (Ala.Cr.App.1982). | 2 | 2 |
Stubbs v. Stategreen2 sentences1996The circuit court is “to hold another evidentiary hearing in order for it to comply with § 12-15-34,” Stubbs v. State, 522 So.2d 9, 11 (Ala. Cr.App.1988), and “the corrected record must disclose that the transferring court, upon remand, did consider evidence of relevant factors not addressed in its former, incorrect or insufficient order,” id. 1996The circuit court is “to hold another evidentiary hearing in order for it to comply with § 12-15-34,” Stubbs v. State, 522 So.2d 9, 11 (Ala. Cr.App.1988), and “the corrected record must disclose that the transferring court, upon remand, did consider evidence of relevant factors not addressed in its former, incorrect or insufficient order,” id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Palmer v. State
green
2 sentences1994Palmer v. State, 485 So.2d 1247 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). “‘[T]he weighing of the six statutory factors and other considerations in determining whether a juvenile should be transferred from the juvenile court to the circuit court for criminal prosecution as an adult does not involve “a mere tallying of the circumstances for the purpose of numerical comparison”.... 1993Palmer v. State, 485 So.2d 1247 (Ala.Cr .App.1986). “[T]he weighing of the six statutory factors and other considerations in determining whether a juvenile should be transferred from the juvenile court to the circuit court for criminal prosecution as an adult does not involve ‘a mere tallying of the circumstances for the purpose of numerical comparison’.... | 3 | 1993–1994 |
Bragg v. State
green
2 sentences1988The mere recital in the transfer order, however, that the trial court has considered the six statutory factors is sufficient, Brown v. State, 353 So.2d 1384 (Ala.1978), where there is evidence to support the order.” Bragg v. State, 416 So.2d at 717 . 1986"The mere recital in the transfer order, that the trial court has considered the six statutory factors [outlined in § 12-15-34 (d)] is sufficient, Brown v. State , 353 So.2d 1384 (Ala. 1977), where there is evidence to support the order." Bragg , 416 So.2d at 717 . | 3 | 1984–1988 |
Brown v. State
green
2 sentences1988The mere recital in the transfer order, however, that the trial court has considered the six statutory factors is sufficient, Brown v. State, 353 So.2d 1384 (Ala.1978), where there is evidence to support the order.” Bragg v. State, 416 So.2d at 717 . 1986"The mere recital in the transfer order, that the trial court has considered the six statutory factors [outlined in § 12-15-34 (d)] is sufficient, Brown v. State , 353 So.2d 1384 (Ala. 1977), where there is evidence to support the order." Bragg , 416 So.2d at 717 . | 3 | 1982–1988 |
Cruse v. State
neutral
2 sentences1994The Court of Criminal Appeals, in Cruse v. State, 474 So.2d 106 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), stated the following: "Our review convinces us that an appeal of the transfer order would have resulted in a reversal of that order for its failure to list the six statutory factors. 1994The Court of Criminal Appeals, in Cruse v. State, 474 So.2d 106 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), stated the following: “Our review convinces us that an appeal of the transfer order would have resulted in a reversal of that order for its failure to list the six statutory factors. | 2 | 1994–1994 |
AM v. State
neutral
2 sentences1993The weighing and balancing of the six statutory factors in determining whether to transfer a juvenile to circuit court for adult prosecution "does not involve the mere tallying of the circumstances for numerical comparison." A.M., 623 So.2d at 426 ; see also N.D.T. v. State, 592 So.2d 647 (Ala.Crim.App.1991). 1993The weighing and balancing of the six statutory factors in determining whether to transfer a juvenile to circuit court for adult prosecution “does not involve the mere tallying of the circumstances for numerical comparison.” A.M., 623 So.2d at 426 ; see also N.D.T. v. State, 592 So.2d 647 (Ala.Crim.App.1991). | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Ex Parte Clisby
green
2 sentences1991There was also evidence that the appellant was a member of the Vice Lords, a juvenile gang. *650 Like the weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in a deciding whether the death penalty should be imposed, the weighing of the six statutory factors and other considerations in determining whether a juvenile should be transferred from the juvenile court to the circuit court for criminal prosecution as an adult does not involve "a mere tallying of [the] circumstances for the purpose of numerical comparison." Clisby v. State, 456 So.2d 99, 102 (Ala.Cr.App.), affirmed, 456 So.2d 105 (Ala 1991Like the weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in a deciding whether the death penalty should be imposed, the weighing of the six statutory factors and other considerations in determining whether a juvenile should be transferred from the juvenile court to the circuit court for criminal prosecution as an adult does not involve “a mere tallying of [the] circumstances for the purpose of numerical comparison.” Clisby v. State, 456 So.2d 99, 102 (Ala.Cr.App.), affirmed, 456 So.2d 105 (Ala.1983), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1009 , 105 S.Ct. 1372 , 84 L.Ed.2d 391 (1985). | 2 | 1991–1991 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence1986An appellate court will not interfere with a juvenile court's order of transfer unless that order is "clearly erroneous." Williams v. State , 361 So.2d 1157 (Ala. 1978). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Alabama Hide and Tallow Co. v. Pincheon
green
2 sentences1982Alabama Hide and Tallow Company v. Pincheon , 282 Ala. 404 , 211 So.2d 896 (1968). 1982Alabama Hide and Tallow Company v. Pincheon , 282 Ala. 404 , 211 So.2d 896 (1968). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.