Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Wisconsin opinions name it 1 courts 2019–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Termination of Parental Rights to Alexandergreen2 sentences2022See Steven V. v. Kelley H., 2004 WI 47, ¶27 , 271 Wis. 2d 1 , 678 N.W.2d 856 (explaining that at the dispositional phase, the circuit court considers any relevant evidence to the TPR proceeding and “must at a minimum consider the six ‘best interests’ factors set forth in []§ 48.426(3).”) Although D.H. contends that the “best interests” standard was not addressed by the court, he does not argue that the circuit court failed to address the six statutory factors. ¶16 To the extent that we interpret D.H. to argue that the circuit court failed to address the “best interests” standard because the co 2020Steven V. v. Kelley H., 2004 WI 47, ¶27 , 271 Wis. 2d 1 , 678 N.W.2d 856 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2 |
Steven v. v. Kelley H.green2 sentences2022See Steven V. v. Kelley H., 2004 WI 47, ¶27 , 271 Wis. 2d 1 , 678 N.W.2d 856 (explaining that at the dispositional phase, the circuit court considers any relevant evidence to the TPR proceeding and “must at a minimum consider the six ‘best interests’ factors set forth in []§ 48.426(3).”) Although D.H. contends that the “best interests” standard was not addressed by the court, he does not argue that the circuit court failed to address the six statutory factors. ¶16 To the extent that we interpret D.H. to argue that the circuit court failed to address the “best interests” standard because the co 2022See Steven V. v. Kelley H., 2004 WI 47, ¶27 , 271 Wis. 2d 1 , 678 N.W.2d 856 (explaining that at the dispositional phase, the circuit court considers any relevant evidence to the TPR proceeding and “must at a minimum consider the six ‘best interests’ factors set forth in []§ 48.426(3).”) Although D.H. contends that the “best interests” standard was not addressed by the court, he does not argue that the circuit court failed to address the six statutory factors. ¶16 To the extent that we interpret D.H. to argue that the circuit court failed to address the “best interests” standard because the co | 1 | 2 |
State v. ROBERT K.green2 sentences2022See State v. Robert K., 2005 WI 152, ¶33 , 286 Wis. 2d 143 , 706 N.W.2d 257 . ¶17 To understand why D.H.’s argument fails, we turn to the statute: “In considering the best interests of the child under [WIS. 2022See State v. Robert K., 2005 WI 152, ¶33 , 286 Wis. 2d 143 , 706 N.W.2d 257 . ¶17 To understand why D.H.’s argument fails, we turn to the statute: “In considering the best interests of the child under [WIS. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sheboygan County Department of Health & Human Services v. Julie A.B.
green
2 sentences2019DHHS v. Julie A.B., 2002 WI 95 , ¶¶28- 29, 255 Wis. 2d 170 , 648 N.W.2d. 402 , but it must consider the following six statutory factors: (a) The likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time of the disposition and, if applicable, at the time the child was removed from the home. (c) Whether the child has substantial relationships with the parent or other family members, and whether it would be harmful to the child to sever these relationships. (d) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from the chil 2019DHHS v. Julie A.B., 2002 WI 95 , ¶¶28- 29, 255 Wis. 2d 170 , 648 N.W.2d. 402 , but it must consider the following six statutory factors: (a) The likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time of the disposition and, if applicable, at the time the child was removed from the home. (c) Whether the child has substantial relationships with the parent or other family members, and whether it would be harmful to the child to sever these relationships. (d) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from the chil | 2 | 2019–2026 |
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC v. City of Delavan
green
2 sentences2023Lowe’s Home Ctrs., LLC v. City of Delavan, 2023 WI 8, ¶25 , 405 Wis. 2d 616 , 985 N.W.2d 69 . ¶41 The circuit court evaluated and weighed the six statutory factors enumerated at WIS. 2023Lowe’s Home Ctrs., LLC v. City of Delavan, 2023 WI 8, ¶25 , 405 Wis. 2d 616 , 985 N.W.2d 69 . ¶41 The circuit court evaluated and weighed the six statutory factors enumerated at WIS. | 2 | 2023–2023 |
State v. MARGARET H.
green
2 sentences2022As our supreme court explained, the six statutory factors “give contour” to the best interests standard and “serve to guide courts in gauging whether termination is the appropriate disposition.” State v. Margaret H., 2000 WI 42, ¶34 , 234 Wis. 2d 606 , 610 N.W.2d 475 . 2022As our supreme court explained, the six statutory factors “give contour” to the best interests standard and “serve to guide courts in gauging whether termination is the appropriate disposition.” State v. Margaret H., 2000 WI 42, ¶34 , 234 Wis. 2d 606 , 610 N.W.2d 475 . | 2 | 2021–2022 |
Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.
green
2 sentences2024Boyer Constr., Inc., 2010 WI 74, ¶20 , 326 Wis. 2d 521 , 785 N.W.2d 462 . ¶13 In making the best-interests determination, the circuit court must consider the six statutory factors set forth in WIS. 2024Boyer Constr., Inc., 2010 WI 74, ¶20 , 326 Wis. 2d 521 , 785 N.W.2d 462 . ¶13 In making the best-interests determination, the circuit court must consider the six statutory factors set forth in WIS. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Mable K.
green
2 sentences2022DHS v. Mable K., 2013 WI 28, ¶39 , 346 Wis. 2d 396 , 828 N.W.2d 198 . ¶29 J.W. does not challenge the circuit court’s findings on the six statutory factors discussed during the dispositional hearing. 2022DHS v. Mable K., 2013 WI 28, ¶39 , 346 Wis. 2d 396 , 828 N.W.2d 198 . ¶29 J.W. does not challenge the circuit court’s findings on the six statutory factors discussed during the dispositional hearing. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.