22 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Welchgreen2 sentences2008These three jur-isprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine, [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). 2002These Lthree jurisprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine. [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). | 9 | 15 |
Wong Sun v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2008These three jur-isprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine, [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). 2008These three jur-isprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine, [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). | 4 | 5 |
Brown v. Illinoisgreen2 sentences2011In its analysis of whether the evidence seized should be suppressed, the Hill court considered the multi-factor test for the attenuation doctrine set forth in Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 427 (1975). 2011In its analysis of whether the evidence seized should be suppressed, the Hill court considered the multi-factor test for the attenuation doctrine set forth in Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 427 (1975). | 4 | 5 |
State v. Guygreen2 sentences2008These three jur-isprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine, [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). 2002These Lthree jurisprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine. [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). | 1 | 10 |
Nardone v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1994See, Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 , 60 S.Ct. 266 , 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939); Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 , 102 S.Ct. 2664 , 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982). [3] "In dealing with search warrants based on confidential tips, the Supreme Court has refined the two-pronged test [footnote omitted] of veracity and basis of knowledge into a `totality of the circumstances' test invoking `whether, given all of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before [the magistrate], including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that con 1994See, Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 , 60 S.Ct. 266 , 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939); Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 , 102 S.Ct. 2664 , 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982). [3] "In dealing with search warrants based on confidential tips, the Supreme Court has refined the two-pronged test [footnote omitted] of veracity and basis of knowledge into a `totality of the circumstances' test invoking `whether, given all of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before [the magistrate], including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that con | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Crews
green
2 sentences2008These three jur-isprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine, [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). 2008These three jur-isprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine, [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). | 18 | 1991–2020 |
Bush v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008These three jur-isprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine, [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). 2002These Lthree jurisprudentially created doctrines which prevent the suppression of evidence are: (1) the independent source doctrine, (2) the inevitable discovery doctrine, and (3) the attenuation doctrine. [footnote omitted] Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471, 487 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455 (1963); U.S. v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Guy, 575 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), writ denied 578 So.2d 930 (La.1991). | 6 | 1993–2012 |
State v. Irby
green
2 sentences2008See also State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Irby, 93-2220 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/4/94) , 632 So.2d 801 . 2001See also State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Irby, 93-2220 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/4/94) , 632 So.2d 801 . | 4 | 1995–2008 |
State v. Hill
green
1 sentence2002Id. at p. 3, 725 So.2d at 1284 (citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975)). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Mickens
green
1 sentence2001The law regarding probable cause is set forth in the case of State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5th Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 74 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 (citations omitted) as follows: An arrest made without probable cause is illegal and the seizure of evidence pursuant to an illegal arrest is also illegal ... | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence2001The law regarding probable cause is set forth in the case of State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5th Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 74 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 (citations omitted) as follows: An arrest made without probable cause is illegal and the seizure of evidence pursuant to an illegal arrest is also illegal ... | 1 | 2001–2001 |
LK v. Reed
green
1 sentence1997See also State v. Welch, 449 So.2d 468 (La.1984); State v. Irby, 93-2220 (La.App. 4th Cir. 2/4/94), 632 So.2d 801 , writ den. 94-0580 (La.4/29/94), 637 So.2d 461 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Taylor v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1994See, Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 , 60 S.Ct. 266 , 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939); Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 , 102 S.Ct. 2664 , 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982). [3] "In dealing with search warrants based on confidential tips, the Supreme Court has refined the two-pronged test [footnote omitted] of veracity and basis of knowledge into a `totality of the circumstances' test invoking `whether, given all of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before [the magistrate], including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that con 1994See, Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 , 60 S.Ct. 266 , 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939); Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 , 102 S.Ct. 2664 , 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982). [3] "In dealing with search warrants based on confidential tips, the Supreme Court has refined the two-pronged test [footnote omitted] of veracity and basis of knowledge into a `totality of the circumstances' test invoking `whether, given all of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before [the magistrate], including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that con | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Illinois v. Gates
green
2 sentences1994See, Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 , 60 S.Ct. 266 , 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939); Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 , 102 S.Ct. 2664 , 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982). [3] "In dealing with search warrants based on confidential tips, the Supreme Court has refined the two-pronged test [footnote omitted] of veracity and basis of knowledge into a `totality of the circumstances' test invoking `whether, given all of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before [the magistrate], including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that con 1994See, Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 , 60 S.Ct. 266 , 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939); Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 , 102 S.Ct. 2664 , 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982). [3] "In dealing with search warrants based on confidential tips, the Supreme Court has refined the two-pronged test [footnote omitted] of veracity and basis of knowledge into a `totality of the circumstances' test invoking `whether, given all of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before [the magistrate], including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that con | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.