22 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1867–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Transportation v. Jones Bros. Dirt & Paving Contractors, Inc.green2 sentences2009See Jones Bros., 92 S.W.3d at 480 . 2009See Jones Bros., 92 S.W.3d at 480 . | 5 | 5 |
Leachman v. Dretkegreen2 sentences2011See Leachman, 261 S.W.3d at 312 ; Moreland v. Johnson, 95 S.W.3d 392, 395 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (“A suit that is not timely filed pursuant to section 14.005(b) is barred and may be dismissed with prejudice.”). 2011See Leachman , 261 S.W.3d at 312 ; Moreland v. Johnson , 95 S.W.3d 392, 395 ( Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (“A suit that is not timely filed pursuant to section 14.005( b) is barred and may be dismissed with prejudice.”). | 2 | 2 |
Moreland v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2011See Leachman, 261 S.W.3d at 312 ; Moreland v. Johnson, 95 S.W.3d 392, 395 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (“A suit that is not timely filed pursuant to section 14.005(b) is barred and may be dismissed with prejudice.”). 2011See Leachman , 261 S.W.3d at 312 ; Moreland v. Johnson , 95 S.W.3d 392, 395 ( Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (“A suit that is not timely filed pursuant to section 14.005( b) is barred and may be dismissed with prejudice.”). | 2 | 2 |
City of San Antonio v. McKenzie Construction Co.green2 sentences2009Co., 150 S.W.2d 989, 996 (Tex. 1941) . 2009Co., 150 S.W.2d 989, 996 (Tex. 1941). | 2 | 2 |
Balderas v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Balderas, 517 S.W.3d at 766 . | 1 | 1 |
McKnight v. McKnightgreen1 sentence2005See id. [6] The trial court also ordered Sergio to pay child support. [7] Again, although Sergio refers to the trial court = s A gross error, @ we will review his complaint as an abuse of discretion argument. [8] Although the child = s written choice was filed with the trial court, the written choice was not admitted as evidence at trial, and the child did not testify. | 1 | 1 |
Hull v. Stategreen2 sentences2002The trial court first states, "[F]or reasons that I fail to understand, the jury having found you guilty, gave you the opportunity to have probation." [1] Hull v. *221 State, 29 S.W.3d 602, 604 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2000). 2002The trial court first states, “[F]or reasons that I fail to understand, the jury having found you guilty, gave you the opportunity to have probation.” 1 Hull v. State, 29 S.W.3d 602, 604 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2000). | 1 | 1 |
William Ralph v. Vernon L. Pepersack, Warden, Maryland State Penitentiarygreen1 sentence1982Inextricably bound up in this consideration would be whether the arrest was illegal as a matter of failure to comply with technical requirements or whether the arrest and subsequent search and seizure amounted to a gross violation of legal processes.’ *318 “By footnote, the court elaborated on the distinction between ‘failure to comply with technical requirements’ and ‘a gross violation of legal processes’ with this quote from Ralph v. Pepersack, 335 F.2d 128, 136 (4 Cir. 1964): ‘[T]here is a significant distinction between police action which is unlawful because violative of constitutional pr | 1 | 1 |
Kenneth B. Moffett v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Correctionsgreen1 sentence1982Moffett v. Wainwright, 512 F.2d 496, 503 (5th Cir. 1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rampel v. Wascher
green
2 sentences2004Rampel, 845 S.W.2d at 921 . 2004Rampel, 845 S.W.2d at 921 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
GPA Holding, Inc. v. Baylor Health Care System
green
1 sentence2014First, it contends the arbitrator’s award conflicted with portions of the contract and with our opinion in GPA Holding v. Baylor Health Care Syst, 344 S.W.3d 467 (Tex. App.--Dallas 2011, pet. denied)2. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2011Gross, 129 S. Ct. at 2349 n.2. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Ben Herbert Phelper v. Bill Decker, Sheriff of Dallas County, Texas
green
1 sentence1987The “most important” consideration was deemed to be “whether the arrest was illegal as a matter of failure to comply with technical requirements or whether the arrest and subsequent search and seizure amounted to a gross violation of legal processes.” Id., at 237-38 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Cox v. Barton
green
1 sentence1961He relies on Wheeler v. Boyd, 1887, 69 Tex. 293 , 6 S.W. 614 ; Cox v. Barton, Tex.Com.App.1919, 212 S.W. 652 ; Denman v. Stuart, 1944, 142 Tex. 129 , 176 S.W.2d 730 ; Reid v. Byrd, Tex.Civ.App., 34 S.W.2d 305 ; Ross v. Brewer, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 307 ; and similar cases. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Ross v. Brewer
green
1 sentence1961He relies on Wheeler v. Boyd, 1887, 69 Tex. 293 , 6 S.W. 614 ; Cox v. Barton, Tex.Com.App.1919, 212 S.W. 652 ; Denman v. Stuart, 1944, 142 Tex. 129 , 176 S.W.2d 730 ; Reid v. Byrd, Tex.Civ.App., 34 S.W.2d 305 ; Ross v. Brewer, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 307 ; and similar cases. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Reid v. Byrd
neutral
1 sentence1961He relies on Wheeler v. Boyd, 1887, 69 Tex. 293 , 6 S.W. 614 ; Cox v. Barton, Tex.Com.App.1919, 212 S.W. 652 ; Denman v. Stuart, 1944, 142 Tex. 129 , 176 S.W.2d 730 ; Reid v. Byrd, Tex.Civ.App., 34 S.W.2d 305 ; Ross v. Brewer, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 307 ; and similar cases. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Wheeler v. Boyd
green
2 sentences1961He relies on Wheeler v. Boyd, 1887, 69 Tex. 293 , 6 S.W. 614 ; Cox v. Barton, Tex.Com.App.1919, 212 S.W. 652 ; Denman v. Stuart, 1944, 142 Tex. 129 , 176 S.W.2d 730 ; Reid v. Byrd, Tex.Civ.App., 34 S.W.2d 305 ; Ross v. Brewer, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 307 ; and similar cases. 1961He relies on Wheeler v. Boyd, 1887, 69 Tex. 293 , 6 S.W. 614 ; Cox v. Barton, Tex.Com.App.1919, 212 S.W. 652 ; Denman v. Stuart, 1944, 142 Tex. 129 , 176 S.W.2d 730 ; Reid v. Byrd, Tex.Civ.App., 34 S.W.2d 305 ; Ross v. Brewer, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 307 ; and similar cases. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Denman v. Stuart
green
2 sentences1961He relies on Wheeler v. Boyd, 1887, 69 Tex. 293 , 6 S.W. 614 ; Cox v. Barton, Tex.Com.App.1919, 212 S.W. 652 ; Denman v. Stuart, 1944, 142 Tex. 129 , 176 S.W.2d 730 ; Reid v. Byrd, Tex.Civ.App., 34 S.W.2d 305 ; Ross v. Brewer, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 307 ; and similar cases. 1961He relies on Wheeler v. Boyd, 1887, 69 Tex. 293 , 6 S.W. 614 ; Cox v. Barton, Tex.Com.App.1919, 212 S.W. 652 ; Denman v. Stuart, 1944, 142 Tex. 129 , 176 S.W.2d 730 ; Reid v. Byrd, Tex.Civ.App., 34 S.W.2d 305 ; Ross v. Brewer, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 307 ; and similar cases. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Maddox Bros. & Anderson v. Fenner
green
1 sentence1925In the case of Maddox v. Fenner, 79 Tex. 291 , 15 S. W. 237 , the contention was “successfully made” that, unless the surveyor of the Stevens tract, the boundaries of which were in controversy, made a gross error in his calls for course and distance, he c.ould not have embraced within said tract all the land between the adjacent surveys, the lines and corners of which were called for in • his field notes of the Stevens survey. — the excess being over 1900 varas. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Warthan v. State
neutral
1 sentence1910Warthan v. State, 41 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Varick v. Smith & The Attorney General
green
1 sentence1889But, if within the words of the statutes or charters, it seems to me a gross violation of the citizen’s rights that his property should be violently taken for private use.” In Railway Co. v. Benwood, recently (1888) decided by the supreme court of appeals of West Vir-' ginia, this subject is ably discussed and all the leading cases are reviewed, and the conclusion reached and announced that a railroad corporation cannot condemn land for right of way for a switch to a steam-mill, for the purpose of transporting freight to and from said mill, that not being a “public use.” In the Matter of Alban | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Campion v. Angier
green
1 sentence1867This should be done, as the better practice, in all cases. ( 16 Tex., 93 ; 20 Tex., 536 ; 16 Tex., 21 ; Harrison v. Cotton, Galveston T., 1860,) [ 25 Tex., 53 .] When the affidavit does not show legal diligence, but an excuse for not using it, then it is addressed to the discretionary powers of the court, and it should show that he has merits in his case, and that the evidence can be procured within a reasonable time. | 1 | 1867–1867 |
Dangerfield v. Paschal
green
1 sentence1867This should be done, as the better practice, in all cases. ( 16 Tex., 93 ; 20 Tex., 536 ; 16 Tex., 21 ; Harrison v. Cotton, Galveston T., 1860,) [ 25 Tex., 53 .] When the affidavit does not show legal diligence, but an excuse for not using it, then it is addressed to the discretionary powers of the court, and it should show that he has merits in his case, and that the evidence can be procured within a reasonable time. | 1 | 1867–1867 |
Harrison v. Cotton
neutral
1 sentence1867This should be done, as the better practice, in all cases. ( 16 Tex., 93 ; 20 Tex., 536 ; 16 Tex., 21 ; Harrison v. Cotton, Galveston T., 1860,) [ 25 Tex., 53 .] When the affidavit does not show legal diligence, but an excuse for not using it, then it is addressed to the discretionary powers of the court, and it should show that he has merits in his case, and that the evidence can be procured within a reasonable time. | 1 | 1867–1867 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.