Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Granger v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Granger v. State, 3 S.W.3d 36, 38 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Trevino v. State, 100 S.W.3d 232, 238 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). 2003Granger v. State, 3 S.W.3d 36, 38 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Dyson v. State, 672 S.W.2d 460, 463 (Tex.Crim.App.1984). | 7 | 7 |
Ferrel v. Stategreen2 sentences2009Ferrel v. State , 55 S.W.3d 586, 591 (Tex. Crim. 2009Ferrel v. State, 55 S.W.3d 586, 591 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Oursbourn v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See Oursbourn , 259 S.W.3d at 173 -74 . 2017See Oursbourn, 259 S.W.3d at 173–74. | 2 | 2 |
Odelugo, Aghaegbunagreen1 sentence2019Odelugo v. State, 443 S.W.3d 131, 138 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Murchison v. Stategreen1 sentence2007Murchison v. State , 93 S.W.3d 239, 252 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. ref = d). | 1 | 1 |
Trevino v. Stategreen1 sentence2006Granger v. State, 3 S.W.3d 36, 38 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Trevino v. State, 100 S.W.3d 232, 238 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). | 1 | 1 |
Dyson v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Granger v. State, 3 S.W.3d 36, 38 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Dyson v. State, 672 S.W.2d 460, 463 (Tex.Crim.App.1984). | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Stategreen1 sentence2000Miller v. State , 815 S.W.2d 582, 585 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Washington v. Stategreen1 sentence1994Stone v. State, 703 S.W.2d 652, 655 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Wash *323 ington v. State, 663 S.W.2d 506, 508 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, pet. refd). | 1 | 1 |
Stone v. Stategreen1 sentence1994Stone v. State, 703 S.W.2d 652, 655 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Wash *323 ington v. State, 663 S.W.2d 506, 508 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, pet. refd). | 1 | 1 |
Burgett v. Stategreen1 sentence1993Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 38.23 (Vernon Supp. 1993); Burgett v. State, 646 S.W.2d 615, 619 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth 1983, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hamel v. State
green
2 sentences2024Hamel, 916 S.W.2d at 493 . 2022Id. | 2 | 2022–2024 |
Holmes v. State
green
1 sentence2015In Holmes, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals “reiterate[d] that an objection to the admissibility of evidence under the first sentence of Article 38.23 is not a prerequisite to the right to a jury instruction regarding a disputed factual issue under the second sentence of Article 38.23.” Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.