agreement with a forum-selection clause in Texas

2017Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 20 (1983). –8– forum will be so gravely difficult and inconvenient that he will for all practical purposes be deprived of his day in court.” In re AIU, 148 S.W.3d at 113 (quoting M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off– Shore Co., 407 U.S. at 18 ); see also Lyon, 257 S.W.3d at 234 (“By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.”).

2011Further, the Texas Supreme Court has recently noted that “[b]y entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.” Lyon, 257 S.W.3d at 234 .

2018See In re Laibe Corp., 307 S.W.3d 314, 317 (Tex. 2010) (orig. proceeding) (“By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons” (quoting Lyon Fin.

2011Servs., Inc., 257 S.W.3d 228, 234 (Tex.2008) (per curiam) (“By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.”); see also In re Laibe Corp., 307 S.W.3d at 317 (explaining that, absent proof of special and unusual circumstances, trial in another forum is not is not so gravely difficult and inconvenient as to warrant disregarding the contractually-specified forum); In re Int’l Profit Ass

2015“By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.” Int’l Profit Assocs., Inc., 274 S.W.3d at 680 .

2015“By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause 'will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.” -Int’l Profit Assocs., Inc., 274 S.W.3d at 680 .

2026Co., 148 S.W.3d 109, 113 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding) (quoting The Bremen v. Zapata Off–Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 2 (1972)). 27 “By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.” In re Lyon Fin.

2017Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 20 (1983). –8– forum will be so gravely difficult and inconvenient that he will for all practical purposes be deprived of his day in court.” In re AIU, 148 S.W.3d at 113 (quoting M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off– Shore Co., 407 U.S. at 18 ); see also Lyon, 257 S.W.3d at 234 (“By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.”).

2026Co., 148 S.W.3d 109, 113 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding) (quoting The Bremen v. Zapata Off–Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 2 (1972)). 27 “By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.” In re Lyon Fin.

2017Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 20 (1983). –8– forum will be so gravely difficult and inconvenient that he will for all practical purposes be deprived of his day in court.” In re AIU, 148 S.W.3d at 113 (quoting M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off– Shore Co., 407 U.S. at 18 ); see also Lyon, 257 S.W.3d at 234 (“By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.”).

2017Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 20 (1983). –8– forum will be so gravely difficult and inconvenient that he will for all practical purposes be deprived of his day in court.” In re AIU, 148 S.W.3d at 113 (quoting M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off– Shore Co., 407 U.S. at 18 ); see also Lyon, 257 S.W.3d at 234 (“By entering into an agreement with a forum-selection clause, the parties effectively represent to each other that the agreed forum is not so inconvenient that enforcing the clause will deprive either party of its day in court, whether for cost or other reasons.”).

2012Servs, 257 S.W.3d at 234 ; see In re ADM Investor Servs., 304 S.W.3d at 375 ; see also In re Ebay, Inc., 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 5340 , at *6.