Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. City of Seven Pointsgreen2 sentences2014“However, this rule is not without exception—a writ of mandamus may issue in a proper case to correct a clear abuse of discretion by a public official.” Id. 2013Anderson v. City of Seven Points, 806 S.W.2d 791, 793 (Tex.1991) (citations omitted). | 3 | 6 |
Dykes v. City of Houstongreen2 sentences2014“This is especially so where there is no adequate remedy at law.” Dykes v. City of Houston, 406 S.W.2d 176, 183 (Tex. 1966). 1991Womack v. Berry, 291 S.W.2d at 682 ; Dykes v. City of Houston, 406 S.W.2d 176, 183 (Tex.1966). | 2 | 2 |
Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of Oklahomagreen2 sentences1976Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of Okla., 449 S.W.2d 458 (Tex.1969), Broussard v. Moon, 431 S.W.2d 534 (Tex.1968), Moss v. Hipp, 387 S.W.2d 656 (Tex.1965). 1976There is an added reason for recognizing the exception when the opposite party had the means and opportunity of disproving the testimony, if it were not true, and failed to do so.” Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Company of Oklahoma, 449 S.W.2d 458 at 467 (Tex.Sup.1969). | 1 | 2 |
Jefferson v. Stategreen1 sentence1997While the general rule is that an “unconstitutional statute is void from its inception and cannot provide a basis for any right or relief,” Jefferson v. State, 751 S.W.2d 502, 502-03 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), the rule is not without exception. | 1 | 1 |
Lapasnick v. Stategreen1 sentence1997Lapasnick v. State, 784 S.W.2d 366, 368 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strobel v. Thurman
green
2 sentences2004Strobel , 565 S.W. 2d at 239 (citing predecessor Family Code section 14.10(c)). 2004Strobel, 565 S.W. 2d at 239 (citing predecessor Family Code section 14.10(c)). | 3 | 2004–2004 |
Womack v. Berry
green
2 sentences2015Womack v. Berry, of Seven Points was less than 400 and that a petition signed 291 S.W.2d at 682 ; Dykes v. City of Houston, 406 S.W.2d by at least two-thirds of the qualified voters was submitted 176, 183 (Tex.1966). 1991Womack v. Berry, 291 S.W.2d at 682 ; Dykes v. City of Houston, 406 S.W.2d 176, 183 (Tex.1966). | 2 | 1991–2015 |
Cayan v. Cayan
green
1 sentence2002Id. at 166 n. 8. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Moss v. Hipp
green
1 sentence1976Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of Okla., 449 S.W.2d 458 (Tex.1969), Broussard v. Moon, 431 S.W.2d 534 (Tex.1968), Moss v. Hipp, 387 S.W.2d 656 (Tex.1965). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Broussard v. Moon
green
1 sentence1976Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of Okla., 449 S.W.2d 458 (Tex.1969), Broussard v. Moon, 431 S.W.2d 534 (Tex.1968), Moss v. Hipp, 387 S.W.2d 656 (Tex.1965). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Ballew
green
1 sentence1964Co. v. Ballew (Tex.Com.App.), 66 S.W.2d 659 , 661: “ * * * When the new cause or agency concurs with the continuing and co-operating original negligence in working the injury, the original negligence remains a proximate cause of the injury, and the fact that the new *888 concurring cause or agency may not in such case have been reasonably foreseeable should not relieve the wrongdoer of liability. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
McGuire v. City of Dallas
green
1 sentence1957The case of McGuire v. City of Dallas, 141 Texas 170 , 170 S.W. 2d 722,728 , states an exception that: “* * * Where the testimony of an interested witness is uncontradicted, is clear and positive, and there are no circumstances in evidence tending to discredit or impeach such testimony, conclusive effect may be given thereto. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
McGuire v. City of Dallas
green
1 sentence1957The case of McGuire v. City of Dallas, 141 Texas 170 , 170 S.W. 2d 722,728 , states an exception that: “* * * Where the testimony of an interested witness is uncontradicted, is clear and positive, and there are no circumstances in evidence tending to discredit or impeach such testimony, conclusive effect may be given thereto. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Trinity Gravel Co. v. Cranke
green
1 sentence1956Where the testimony of an interested witness is uncontradicted, is clear and positive, and there are no circumstances in evidence tending to discredit or impeach such testimony, conclusive effect may be given thereto. *941 Trinity Gravel Co. v. Cranke, Tex. Com.App., 282 S.W. 798 , loc. cit. 801. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Board of Education of the Kentucky Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1938Regardless of that case, however, the Supreme Court of the United States in Board of Education v. Illinois, 203 U.S. 553 , 27 S.Ct. 171, 173 , 51 L.Ed. 314 , 8 Ann.Cas. 157, affirmed the holding of the Supreme Court of Illinois grounded on the proposition that the State had the power in levying such tax to grant exemptions to such domestic corporations, over which it had control, without granting same to foreign corporations over which it had no control, and that in doing so there was a reasonable classification for purposes of taxation, and not a discrimination within the meaning of the Feder 1938Regardless of that case, however, the Supreme Court of the United States in Board of Education v. Illinois, 203 U.S. 553 , 27 S.Ct. 171, 173 , 51 L.Ed. 314 , 8 Ann.Cas. 157, affirmed the holding of the Supreme Court of Illinois grounded on the proposition that the State had the power in levying such tax to grant exemptions to such domestic corporations, over which it had control, without granting same to foreign corporations over which it had no control, and that in doing so there was a reasonable classification for purposes of taxation, and not a discrimination within the meaning of the Feder | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Smith v. Loughman
green
2 sentences1938This rule is not without exception, and appellant cites us particularly to the case of Smith v. Loughman, 245 N.Y. 486 , 157 N.E. 753 . 1938This rule is not without exception, and appellant cites us particularly to the case of Smith v. Loughman, 245 N.Y. 486 , 157 N.E. 753 . | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.