Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
18 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Buck v. Davisgreen2 sentences2025See also Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100 , 118–20, 137 S.Ct. 759 , 775–77, 197 L.Ed.2d 1 (2017) (explaining the two prongs of Strickland). 2025See also Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100 , 118–20, 137 S.Ct. 759 , 775–77, 197 L.Ed.2d 1 (2017) (explaining the two prongs of Strickland). | 2 | 2 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2025“An error by counsel, even if professionally unreasonable, does not warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding if the error has no effect on the judgment.” Strickland, at 691, 104 S.Ct. 2052 . 2024As set forth in Strickland, “[a]n error by counsel, even if professionally unreasonable, does not warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding if the error had no effect on the judgment.” 466 U.S. at 691 , 104 S.Ct. at 2067 . | 1 | 16 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tollett v. Henderson
green
2 sentences1993In the context of guilty pleas, the first half of the Strickland v. Washington test is nothing more than a restatement of the standard of attorney competence already set forth in Tollett v. Henderson, [ 411 U.S. 258 , 93 S.Ct. 1602 , 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973)], supra, and McMann v. Richardson, supra. The second, or ‘prejudice,’ requirement, on the other hand, focuses on whether counsel’s constitutionally ineffective performance affected the outcome of the plea process. 1993In the context of guilty pleas, the first half of the Strickland v. Washington test is nothing more than a restatement of the standard of attorney competence already set forth in Tollett v. Henderson, [ 411 U.S. 258 , 93 S.Ct. 1602 , 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973)], supra, and McMann v. Richardson, supra. The second, or ‘prejudice,’ requirement, on the other hand, focuses on whether counsel’s constitutionally ineffective performance affected the outcome of the plea process. | 3 | 1986–1993 |
United States v. Morrison
green
1 sentence2017U.S. 361, 101 S. Ct. 665 ,66 L Ed. 2d 664 (1981); Strickland. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Thomas
green
1 sentence2015B “An error by counsel, even if professionally unreasonable, does not warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding if the error had no effect on the judgment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 691 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; Thomas , 12-1410, p. 5, 124 So.3d at 1053 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.