Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Harrisgreen1 sentence1999As stated in United States v. Harris, 846 F.Supp. 121, 126-27 (D.D.C.1994): "Normally, an error by counsel, even if professionally unreasonable, does not warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding if the error had no prejudicial effect on the defense. | 1 | 1 |
Bouie v. Stategreen1 sentence1995Id. 466 U.S. at 691 , 104 S.Ct. at 2066 ; see also Bouie v. State, 559 So.2d 1113, 1115 (Fla.1990). | 1 | 1 |
McNamara v. Stategreen1 sentence1979Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b); McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410, 411 (Fla.1978): “The plea of nolo contendere waives all defects in a criminal proceeding with the exception of jurisdictional ones, and in order to reserve the right to appeal a question of law, appellant must expressly reserve the same by conditioning his plea on the reservation of the specific, narrowly-drawn question of law. . . ” . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2009“An error by counsel, even if professionally unreasonable, does not warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding if the error had no effect on the judgment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 691 , 104 S.Ct. at 2066 . “[T]he defendant must show that [the errors] actually had an adverse effect on the defense.” 466 U.S. at 693 , 104 S.Ct. at 2067 . 2009“An error by counsel, even if professionally unreasonable, does not warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding if the error had no effect on the judgment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 691 , 104 S.Ct. at 2066 . “[T]he defendant must show that [the errors] actually had an adverse effect on the defense.” 466 U.S. at 693 , 104 S.Ct. at 2067 . | 5 | 1995–2009 |
Cuyler v. Sullivan
green
1 sentence1995Id. 466 U.S. at 691 , 104 S.Ct. at 2066 ; see also Bouie v. State, 559 So.2d 1113, 1115 (Fla.1990). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Cameron v. State
green
1 sentence1978Cameron v. State, 291 So.2d 222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), writ disch. 338 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Cameron v. State
neutral
1 sentence1978Cameron v. State, 291 So.2d 222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), writ disch. 338 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.