Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Leite v. Dow Chemical Co.green2 sentences2018See Leite v Dow Chem Co, 439 Mich 920 (1992) (“The Court of Appeals erred when it interpreted MCR 2.116(D)(2) and MCR 2.111(F)(3) as though they required that the defendants’ affirmative defense be raised in their first responsive pleading or be waived.”). 2018See Leite v Dow Chem Co, 439 Mich 920 (1992) (“The Court of Appeals erred when it interpreted MCR 2.116(D)(2) and MCR 2.111(F)(3) as though they required that the defendants’ affirmative defense be raised in their first responsive pleading or be waived.”). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2025People v Jackson, 292 Mich App 583, 597 ; 808 NW2d 541 (2011). 2025People v Jackson, 292 Mich App 583, 597 ; 808 NW2d 541 (2011). | 14 | 2015–2025 |
Straus v. Governor
green
1 sentence2021With the above in mind, although generally a party must raise a defense of personal jurisdiction in a responsive pleading or else the defense is waived for that party, Electrolines, Inc, 260 Mich App at 164 ; MCR 2.111(F)(2), this does not interfere with the court’s continuing obligation to sua sponte question its own jurisdiction, Straus, 459 Mich at 532 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Electrolines, Inc. v. Prudential Assurance Co., Ltd.
green
1 sentence2021With the above in mind, although generally a party must raise a defense of personal jurisdiction in a responsive pleading or else the defense is waived for that party, Electrolines, Inc, 260 Mich App at 164 ; MCR 2.111(F)(2), this does not interfere with the court’s continuing obligation to sua sponte question its own jurisdiction, Straus, 459 Mich at 532 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Evans & Luptak v. Obolensky
green
2 sentences2020MCR 2.003; Evans & Luptak v Obolensky, 194 Mich App 708, 715 ; 487 NW2d 521 (1992). 2020MCR 2.003; Evans & Luptak v Obolensky, 194 Mich App 708, 715 ; 487 NW2d 521 (1992). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Meagher v. Wayne State University
green
2 sentences2020Meagher v Wayne State Univ, 222 Mich App 700, 726 ; 565 NW2d 401 (1997). 2020Meagher v Wayne State Univ, 222 Mich App 700, 726 ; 565 NW2d 401 (1997). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Illes v. Jones Transfer Co.
green
2 sentences2019Illes v Jones Transfer Co (On Remand), 213 Mich App 44 , 56 n 2; 539 NW2d 382 (1995). 2019Illes v Jones Transfer Co (On Remand), 213 Mich App 44 , 56 n 2; 539 NW2d 382 (1995). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.