Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Ralichgreen2 sentences2017Registration svs., Int. v. Ralich, 2009 PA Super 163 , . ~ 14, 982 A;2d 77, 79 (2009), Further, a combined reading of Pa.R.C.P. 3132 and Pa.R.C.P. 3135(a) make clear "a party must raise a challenge to a sheriff's sale within a period oftlme after the sale, but before the deed is delivered." Id. 2017Registration svs., Int. v. Ralich, 2009 PA Super 163 , . ~ 14, 982 A;2d 77, 79 (2009), Further, a combined reading of Pa.R.C.P. 3132 and Pa.R.C.P. 3135(a) make clear "a party must raise a challenge to a sheriff's sale within a period oftlme after the sale, but before the deed is delivered." Id. | 2 | 4 |
Concord-Liberty Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NTC Properties, Inc.green2 sentences2009See Concord-Liberty Sav. and Loan Ass’n v. NTC Properties, Inc., 454 Pa. 472, 475 , 312 A.2d 4, 5 (1973) (holding, before a 2005 amendment extended the time period in Rule 3135 from ten to twenty days, “a party dissatisfied with a sheriffs sale has ten days ... to take exceptions to the sheriffs execution of a sheriffs deed.”). ¶ 17 Taken together, Rule 3132 and 3135(a) make clear a party must raise a challenge to a sheriffs sale within a period of time after the sale, but before the deed is delivered. 2009See Concord-Liberty Sav. and Loan Ass’n v. NTC Properties, Inc., 454 Pa. 472, 475 , 312 A.2d 4, 5 (1973) (holding, before a 2005 amendment extended the time period in Rule 3135 from ten to twenty days, “a party dissatisfied with a sheriffs sale has ten days ... to take exceptions to the sheriffs execution of a sheriffs deed.”). ¶ 17 Taken together, Rule 3132 and 3135(a) make clear a party must raise a challenge to a sheriffs sale within a period of time after the sale, but before the deed is delivered. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Delaware County Regional Water Quality Control Authority v. Sunrise Services Unlimited, Inc.
green
1 sentence2014“Taken together, Rule 3132 and 3135(a) make clear a party must raise a challenge to a sheriff’s sale within a period of time after the sale, but before the deed is delivered.” Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Ralich, 982 A.2d 77, 80 (Pa. Super. 2009), app. denied, 606 Pa. 650 , 992 A.2d 889 (2010). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. RALICH
green
1 sentence2014“Taken together, Rule 3132 and 3135(a) make clear a party must raise a challenge to a sheriff’s sale within a period of time after the sale, but before the deed is delivered.” Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Ralich, 982 A.2d 77, 80 (Pa. Super. 2009), app. denied, 606 Pa. 650 , 992 A.2d 889 (2010). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Erm of Ny Ltd. v. Rainier Group of Atlantic USA
green
1 sentence2014However, “[a] sheriff’s sale may be set aside after delivery of the sheriff’s deed based on fraud or lack of authority to make the sale.” Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
In Re Estate of Pitone
green
2 sentences1999Case law holds that a party must raise a claim for attorney fees for dilatory, obdurate or vexatious behavior; otherwise, the matter is waived. 25A Standard Pennsylvania Practice 2d § 127:49; In re Pitone’s Estate, 297 Pa.Super. 161 , 443 A.2d 349 (1982). 1999Case law holds that a party must raise a claim for attorney fees for dilatory, obdurate or vexatious behavior; otherwise, the matter is waived. 25A Standard Pennsylvania Practice 2d § 127:49; In re Pitone’s Estate, 297 Pa.Super. 161 , 443 A.2d 349 (1982). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.