Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
18 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2026 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chamberlain v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Fourth Issue: Cumulative Error Appellant further complains that “the cumulative error doctrine encompassing all of the jury charge errors set forth above when considered as a whole deprived [him] of a fair and impartial trial.” “The doctrine of cumulative error provides that the cumulative effect of several errors can, in the aggregate, constitute reversible error, even though no single instance of error would.” Holloway v. State, No. 05- 14-01244-CR, 2016 WL 3098297 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 25, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); see also Chamberlain v. State, 998 2019CUMULATIVE ERROR In issue five, appellant contends that “[t]he cumulative effect of the trial court’s successive abuses of discretion resulted in a denial of due process and denied Appellant the right to a fair trial.” “The doctrine of cumulative error provides that the cumulative effect of several errors can, in the aggregate, constitute reversible error, even though no single instance of error would.” Holloway v. State, No. 05-14-01244-CR, 2016 WL 3098297 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 25, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated 23 for publication); see also Chamberlain v. State, 998 S.W.2d | 18 | 18 |
United States v. Martin Gonzalez Munozgreen2 sentences2013See United States v. Munoz, 150 F.3d 401, 418 (5th Cir. 1998); Chamberlain v. State, 998 S.W.2d 230, 238 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) (stating, in dicta, that cumulative error could constitute reversible error). 2010See United States v. Munoz, 150 F.3d 401, 418 (5[th] Cir. 1998); Chamberlain v. State, 998 S.W.2d 230, 238 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999) (stating, in dicta, that cumulative error could constitute reversible error). | 4 | 4 |
Jenkins v. Stategreen1 sentence2021Chamberlain v. State, 998 S.W.2d 230, 238 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); see Jenkins v. State, 493 S.W.3d 583, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). | 1 | 1 |
Gamboa v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See Gamboa, 296 S.W.3d at 585 ; see also Priddy v. State, No. 02-13-00586-CR, 2014 WL 5307180 , at *1 (Tex. App. — Fort Worth Oct. 16, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (“The doctrine of cumulative error provides that the cumulative effect of several errors can, in the aggregate, constitute reversible error, even though no single instance of error would.”) (citing Chamberlain v. State, 998 S.W.2d 230, 238 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.