17 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1907–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relationsgreen2 sentences1995The Wisconsin standard provides that a “mental injury non-traumatieally caused must have resulted *855 from a situation of greater dimensions than the day-to-day emotional strain and tension which all employees must experience.” Id. (emphasis added). 1995The Wisconsin standard provides that a “mental injury non-traumatieally caused must have resulted *855 from a situation of greater dimensions than the day-to-day emotional strain and tension which all employees must experience.” Id. (emphasis added). | 2 | 3 |
State of Iowa v. Deng Kon Tonggreen2 sentences2014See Deng Kon Tong, 805 N.W.2d at 601 ; Kluesner, 389 N.W.2d at 372 . 2014See Deng Kon Tong, 805 N.W.2d at 601 ; Kluesner, 389 N.W.2d at 372 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Greengreen2 sentences2013See Burns v. State, 968 A.2d 1012, 1025 (Del.2009) (holding “a defendant need only make a ‘plausible showing’ that the records sought are material and relevant”); Green, 646 N.W.2d at 310 (noting the Wisconsin standard for production “is not intended ... to be unduly high for the defendant”). 2013See Burns v. State, 968 A.2d 1012, 1025 (Del.2009) (holding “a defendant need only make a ‘plausible showing’ that the records sought are material and relevant”); Green, 646 N.W.2d at 310 (noting the Wisconsin standard for production “is not intended ... to be unduly high for the defendant”). | 2 | 2 |
Burns v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Burns v. State, 968 A.2d 1012, 1025 (Del.2009) (holding “a defendant need only make a ‘plausible showing’ that the records sought are material and relevant”); Green, 646 N.W.2d at 310 (noting the Wisconsin standard for production “is not intended ... to be unduly high for the defendant”). 2013See Burns v. State, 968 A.2d 1012, 1025 (Del.2009) (holding “a defendant need only make a ‘plausible showing’ that the records sought are material and relevant”); Green, 646 N.W.2d at 310 (noting the Wisconsin standard for production “is not intended ... to be unduly high for the defendant”). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Aybargreen2 sentences1930See Perine v. Quackenbush, 104 Cal. 684 ( 38 Pac. 533 ); Bye v. Atlantic City (N. J. 1930See Perine v. Quackenbush, 104 Cal. 684 ( 38 Pac. 533 ); Bye v. Atlantic City (N. J. | 2 | 2 |
N. P. Perine Contracting & Paving Co. v. Quackenbushgreen2 sentences1930See Perine v. Quackenbush, 104 Cal. 684 ( 38 Pac. 533 ); Bye v. Atlantic City (N. J. 1930See Perine v. Quackenbush, 104 Cal. 684 ( 38 Pac. 533 ); Bye v. Atlantic City (N. J. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Piddingtongreen2 sentences2008Because the purpose of Iowa Code section 321J.8 within the statutory scheme is to advise accused drivers of the consequences of submitting to or failing the chemical test, we adopt the Wisconsin standard which requires the officer “under the circumstances facing him or her at the time of the arrest to utilize those methods which are reasonable, and would reasonably convey the implied consent warnings.” Id. at 534-35. 2008Because the purpose of Iowa Code section 321J.8 within the statutory scheme is to advise accused drivers of the consequences of submitting to or failing the chemical test, we adopt the Wisconsin standard which requires the officer “under the circumstances facing him or her at the time of the arrest to utilize those methods which are reasonable, and would reasonably convey the implied consent warnings.” Id. at 534-35. | 1 | 2 |
Dunlavey v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.green1 sentence1996The “modified” Wisconsin rule applied by the board and the district court closely approximates the standard adopted in Dunla-vey, which requires the stress be “of greater magnitude than the day-to-day mental stress experienced by other [police] officers.” Dunlavey, 526 N.W.2d at 857 (adopting the so-called Wyoming rule). | 1 | 1 |
McClain v. Texaco, Inc.green2 sentences1995See Graves, 713 P.2d at 193 (emphasis added); see also McClain v. Texaco, Inc., 29 Ark.App. 218, 220-21, 224 , 780 S.W.2d 34, 35, 37 (1989) (interpreting its “all workers” causation standard and stating that “the ultimate test is whether the stress constitutes an abnormal working condition for [the pertinent] type of employment”). 1995See Graves, 713 P.2d at 193 (emphasis added); see also McClain v. Texaco, Inc., 29 Ark.App. 218, 220-21, 224 , 780 S.W.2d 34, 35, 37 (1989) (interpreting its “all workers” causation standard and stating that “the ultimate test is whether the stress constitutes an abnormal working condition for [the pertinent] type of employment”). | 1 | 1 |
Graves v. Utah Power & Light Co.red1 sentence1995See Graves, 713 P.2d at 193 (emphasis added); see also McClain v. Texaco, Inc., 29 Ark.App. 218, 220-21, 224 , 780 S.W.2d 34, 35, 37 (1989) (interpreting its “all workers” causation standard and stating that “the ultimate test is whether the stress constitutes an abnormal working condition for [the pertinent] type of employment”). | 1 | 1 |
Gilbert v. United States Fire Insurancegreen2 sentences1973Co., 49 Wis.2d 193 , 181 N.W.2d 527, 534 (1970), quoted by the majority. 1973Co., 49 Wis.2d 193 , 181 N.W.2d 527, 534 (1970), quoted by the majority. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kluesner
green
2 sentences2014See Deng Kon Tong, 805 N.W.2d at 601 ; Kluesner, 389 N.W.2d at 372 . 2014See Deng Kon Tong, 805 N.W.2d at 601 ; Kluesner, 389 N.W.2d at 372 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Dolan v. Aid Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1996Dolan, 431 N.W.2d at 794 (quoting Anderson v. Continental Ins. 1996Dolan, 431 N.W.2d at 794 (quoting Anderson v. Continental Ins. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Paramount Fire Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
green
2 sentences1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940). 1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Glens Falls Insurance v. Sterling
green
2 sentences1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940). 1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Beman v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance
green
2 sentences1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940). 1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Royal Zenith Corporation v. Citizens Publications, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1973The court said in 179 N.W.2d at 346 : “In the seller-buyer situation, if the buyer is to obtain insurance at his own expense for the seller’s protection, and does so, plainly that insurer is intended to bear the loss as among the three parties.” The issue actually turns on whether we are to apply, in determination of “loss,” the New York rule or the Wisconsin rule. 1973The court said in 179 N.W.2d at 346 : “In the seller-buyer situation, if the buyer is to obtain insurance at his own expense for the seller’s protection, and does so, plainly that insurer is intended to bear the loss as among the three parties.” The issue actually turns on whether we are to apply, in determination of “loss,” the New York rule or the Wisconsin rule. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Ramsdell v. Insurance Co. of North America
green
2 sentences1973The Wisconsin rule, followed by few jurisdictions, grew out of Ramsdell v. Insurance Co. of North America, 197 Wis. 136 , 221 N.W. 654 (1928). 1973The Wisconsin rule, followed by few jurisdictions, grew out of Ramsdell v. Insurance Co. of North America, 197 Wis. 136 , 221 N.W. 654 (1928). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Parker v. Broadus
green
2 sentences1934Parker v. Broadus, 128 Miss. 699 , 91 So. 394 ; In re Stewart’s Estate, 253 Pa. 277 , 98 A. 569 , Ann. 1934Parker v. Broadus, 128 Miss. 699 , 91 So. 394 ; In re Stewart’s Estate, 253 Pa. 277 , 98 A. 569 , Ann. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Stewart's Estate
neutral
2 sentences1934Parker v. Broadus, 128 Miss. 699 , 91 So. 394 ; In re Stewart’s Estate, 253 Pa. 277 , 98 A. 569 , Ann. 1934Parker v. Broadus, 128 Miss. 699 , 91 So. 394 ; In re Stewart’s Estate, 253 Pa. 277 , 98 A. 569 , Ann. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Star Glass Co. v. Morey
neutral
2 sentences1909(N. H.) 282; Winchester v. Newton, 2 Allen (Mass.) 492; Star Glass Co. v. Morey, 108 Mass. 570, 574 .” And, as we understand it, the Wisconsin rule is the same. 1909(N. H.) 282; Winchester v. Newton, 2 Allen (Mass.) 492; Star Glass Co. v. Morey, 108 Mass. 570, 574 .” And, as we understand it, the Wisconsin rule is the same. | 1 | 1909–1909 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.