Wisconsin rule (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

Wisconsin rule in Iowa

17 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1907–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

CaseFollowedCited
School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relationsgreen
wis · 1974 · cited in 3 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1985–1996
2 sentences

1995The Wisconsin standard provides that a “mental injury non-traumatieally caused must have resulted *855 from a situation of greater dimensions than the day-to-day emotional strain and tension which all employees must experience.” Id. (emphasis added).

1995The Wisconsin standard provides that a “mental injury non-traumatieally caused must have resulted *855 from a situation of greater dimensions than the day-to-day emotional strain and tension which all employees must experience.” Id. (emphasis added).

23
State of Iowa v. Deng Kon Tonggreen
iowa · 2011 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014See Deng Kon Tong, 805 N.W.2d at 601 ; Kluesner, 389 N.W.2d at 372 .

2014See Deng Kon Tong, 805 N.W.2d at 601 ; Kluesner, 389 N.W.2d at 372 .

22
State v. Greengreen
wis · 2002 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See Burns v. State, 968 A.2d 1012, 1025 (Del.2009) (holding “a defendant need only make a ‘plausible showing’ that the records sought are material and relevant”); Green, 646 N.W.2d at 310 (noting the Wisconsin standard for production “is not intended ... to be unduly high for the defendant”).

2013See Burns v. State, 968 A.2d 1012, 1025 (Del.2009) (holding “a defendant need only make a ‘plausible showing’ that the records sought are material and relevant”); Green, 646 N.W.2d at 310 (noting the Wisconsin standard for production “is not intended ... to be unduly high for the defendant”).

22
Burns v. Stategreen
del · 2009 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See Burns v. State, 968 A.2d 1012, 1025 (Del.2009) (holding “a defendant need only make a ‘plausible showing’ that the records sought are material and relevant”); Green, 646 N.W.2d at 310 (noting the Wisconsin standard for production “is not intended ... to be unduly high for the defendant”).

2013See Burns v. State, 968 A.2d 1012, 1025 (Del.2009) (holding “a defendant need only make a ‘plausible showing’ that the records sought are material and relevant”); Green, 646 N.W.2d at 310 (noting the Wisconsin standard for production “is not intended ... to be unduly high for the defendant”).

22
People v. Aybargreen
prsupreme · 1928 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1907–1930
2 sentences

1930See Perine v. Quackenbush, 104 Cal. 684 ( 38 Pac. 533 ); Bye v. Atlantic City (N. J.

1930See Perine v. Quackenbush, 104 Cal. 684 ( 38 Pac. 533 ); Bye v. Atlantic City (N. J.

22
N. P. Perine Contracting & Paving Co. v. Quackenbushgreen
cal · 1894 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1907–1930
2 sentences

1930See Perine v. Quackenbush, 104 Cal. 684 ( 38 Pac. 533 ); Bye v. Atlantic City (N. J.

1930See Perine v. Quackenbush, 104 Cal. 684 ( 38 Pac. 533 ); Bye v. Atlantic City (N. J.

22
State v. Piddingtongreen
wis · 2001 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008Because the purpose of Iowa Code section 321J.8 within the statutory scheme is to advise accused drivers of the consequences of submitting to or failing the chemical test, we adopt the Wisconsin standard which requires the officer “under the circumstances facing him or her at the time of the arrest to utilize those methods which are reasonable, and would reasonably convey the implied consent warnings.” Id. at 534-35.

2008Because the purpose of Iowa Code section 321J.8 within the statutory scheme is to advise accused drivers of the consequences of submitting to or failing the chemical test, we adopt the Wisconsin standard which requires the officer “under the circumstances facing him or her at the time of the arrest to utilize those methods which are reasonable, and would reasonably convey the implied consent warnings.” Id. at 534-35.

12
Dunlavey v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.green
iowa · 1995 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996The “modified” Wisconsin rule applied by the board and the district court closely approximates the standard adopted in Dunla-vey, which requires the stress be “of greater magnitude than the day-to-day mental stress experienced by other [police] officers.” Dunlavey, 526 N.W.2d at 857 (adopting the so-called Wyoming rule).

11
McClain v. Texaco, Inc.green
arkctapp · 1989 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995See Graves, 713 P.2d at 193 (emphasis added); see also McClain v. Texaco, Inc., 29 Ark.App. 218, 220-21, 224 , 780 S.W.2d 34, 35, 37 (1989) (interpreting its “all workers” causation standard and stating that “the ultimate test is whether the stress constitutes an abnormal working condition for [the pertinent] type of employment”).

1995See Graves, 713 P.2d at 193 (emphasis added); see also McClain v. Texaco, Inc., 29 Ark.App. 218, 220-21, 224 , 780 S.W.2d 34, 35, 37 (1989) (interpreting its “all workers” causation standard and stating that “the ultimate test is whether the stress constitutes an abnormal working condition for [the pertinent] type of employment”).

11
Graves v. Utah Power & Light Co.red
wyo · 1986 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995See Graves, 713 P.2d at 193 (emphasis added); see also McClain v. Texaco, Inc., 29 Ark.App. 218, 220-21, 224 , 780 S.W.2d 34, 35, 37 (1989) (interpreting its “all workers” causation standard and stating that “the ultimate test is whether the stress constitutes an abnormal working condition for [the pertinent] type of employment”).

11
Gilbert v. United States Fire Insurancegreen
wis · 1970 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1973–1973
2 sentences

1973Co., 49 Wis.2d 193 , 181 N.W.2d 527, 534 (1970), quoted by the majority.

1973Co., 49 Wis.2d 193 , 181 N.W.2d 527, 534 (1970), quoted by the majority.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Kluesner green
iowa · 1986
2 sentences

2014See Deng Kon Tong, 805 N.W.2d at 601 ; Kluesner, 389 N.W.2d at 372 .

2014See Deng Kon Tong, 805 N.W.2d at 601 ; Kluesner, 389 N.W.2d at 372 .

22014–2014
Dolan v. Aid Insurance Co. green
iowa · 1988
2 sentences

1996Dolan, 431 N.W.2d at 794 (quoting Anderson v. Continental Ins.

1996Dolan, 431 N.W.2d at 794 (quoting Anderson v. Continental Ins.

11996–1996
Paramount Fire Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. green
tex · 1962
2 sentences

1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940).

1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940).

11979–1979
Glens Falls Insurance v. Sterling green
md · 1959
2 sentences

1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940).

1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940).

11979–1979
Beman v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance green
illappct · 1940
2 sentences

1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940).

1979Other courts which have followed the Wisconsin rule include Paramount Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 163 Tex. 250 , 353 S.W.2d 841 (1962); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217 , 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and Beman v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 303 Ill.App. 554 , 25 N.E.2d 603 (1940).

11979–1979
Royal Zenith Corporation v. Citizens Publications, Inc. neutral
iowa · 1970
2 sentences

1973The court said in 179 N.W.2d at 346 : “In the seller-buyer situation, if the buyer is to obtain insurance at his own expense for the seller’s protection, and does so, plainly that insurer is intended to bear the loss as among the three parties.” The issue actually turns on whether we are to apply, in determination of “loss,” the New York rule or the Wisconsin rule.

1973The court said in 179 N.W.2d at 346 : “In the seller-buyer situation, if the buyer is to obtain insurance at his own expense for the seller’s protection, and does so, plainly that insurer is intended to bear the loss as among the three parties.” The issue actually turns on whether we are to apply, in determination of “loss,” the New York rule or the Wisconsin rule.

11973–1973
Ramsdell v. Insurance Co. of North America green
wis · 1928
2 sentences

1973The Wisconsin rule, followed by few jurisdictions, grew out of Ramsdell v. Insurance Co. of North America, 197 Wis. 136 , 221 N.W. 654 (1928).

1973The Wisconsin rule, followed by few jurisdictions, grew out of Ramsdell v. Insurance Co. of North America, 197 Wis. 136 , 221 N.W. 654 (1928).

11973–1973
Parker v. Broadus green
miss · 1922
2 sentences

1934Parker v. Broadus, 128 Miss. 699 , 91 So. 394 ; In re Stewart’s Estate, 253 Pa. 277 , 98 A. 569 , Ann.

1934Parker v. Broadus, 128 Miss. 699 , 91 So. 394 ; In re Stewart’s Estate, 253 Pa. 277 , 98 A. 569 , Ann.

11934–1934
Stewart's Estate neutral
pa · 1916
2 sentences

1934Parker v. Broadus, 128 Miss. 699 , 91 So. 394 ; In re Stewart’s Estate, 253 Pa. 277 , 98 A. 569 , Ann.

1934Parker v. Broadus, 128 Miss. 699 , 91 So. 394 ; In re Stewart’s Estate, 253 Pa. 277 , 98 A. 569 , Ann.

11934–1934
Star Glass Co. v. Morey neutral
mass · 1871
2 sentences

1909(N. H.) 282; Winchester v. Newton, 2 Allen (Mass.) 492; Star Glass Co. v. Morey, 108 Mass. 570, 574 .” And, as we understand it, the Wisconsin rule is the same.

1909(N. H.) 282; Winchester v. Newton, 2 Allen (Mass.) 492; Star Glass Co. v. Morey, 108 Mass. 570, 574 .” And, as we understand it, the Wisconsin rule is the same.

11909–1909

Where else courts name it

WI 179 (1909–2026) IA 17 (1907–2014) MN 9 (1886–2018) CA 8 (1952–2009) TX 7 (1883–2015) MI 7 (1966–1999) IL 7 (1973–2006) OR 6 (1915–1991) AZ 6 (1935–2017) NE 6 (1896–2019) VT 6 (1996–2009) NJ 6 (1961–2001) MD 5 (1959–2018) MA 5 (1978–2006) OH 5 (1955–2015) WA 4 (1937–2002) ND 4 (1906–2021) IN 4 (1905–2016) MT 4 (1910–1991) SD 3 (1916–1968) UT 3 (1984–2015) ID 3 (1980–1986) LA 2 (1916–1976) KS 2 (1958–1968) CO 2 (1920–1923) SC 2 (2004–2006) FL 2 (1975–1996) WV 2 (1999–2012) PA 2 (2009–2011) NH 2 (1974–2003) AR 2 (1992–2001) AL 2 (1929–2002) NY 2 (1974–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check