Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1927–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lyon v. Stategreen2 sentences2012But, despite its language, the former rule had been construed to apply to an appeal of 'any matter in the case,' regardless of whether the matters were 'defects or errors that occur before or after the entry of the plea.'" Cooper , 45 S.W.3d at 79 n.3 (citing Lyon v. State , 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex. Crim. 2012But, despite its language, the former rule had been construed to apply to an appeal of 'any matter in the case,’ regardless of whether the matters were 'defects or errors that occur before or after the entry of the plea.'" Cooper, 45 S.W.3d at 79 n. 3 (citing Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex.Crim.App.1994)). . | 3 | 3 |
Dunn v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Proc Ann. art. 38.23(b); see Dunn, 951 S.W.2d at 479 (“Evidence obtained by a police officer acting in good faith reliance upon a warrant based upon a magistrate’s determination of probable cause should not be rendered inadmissible due to a defect found in the warrant subsequent to its execution.”). | 1 | 1 |
Morris v. Stategreen1 sentence2001But, despite its language, the former rule had been construed to apply to an appeal of "any matter in the case," regardless of whether the matters were "defects or errors that occur before or after the entry of the plea." Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex.Cr.App.1994). [4] Morris v. State, 749 S.W.2d 772, 774 (Tex. Cr.App.1986). [5] Before 1977, all misdemeanants and all felons whose sentences did not exceed 15 years were entitled to bail. | 1 | 1 |
Continental Coffee Products Co. v. Cazarezgreen1 sentence1999See Continental Coffee Prods, v. Cazarez, 937 S.W.2d 444, 450 (Tex.1996). 28 . 748 S.W.2d at 92 (failure to discover or guard against a defect is no defense to a strict liability claim). 29 . | 1 | 1 |
Keen v. Ashot Ashkelon, Ltd.green1 sentence1999See Continental Coffee Prods, v. Cazarez, 937 S.W.2d 444, 450 (Tex.1996). 28 . 748 S.W.2d at 92 (failure to discover or guard against a defect is no defense to a strict liability claim). 29 . | 1 | 1 |
Pirtle v. Gregorygreen1 sentence1997Pirtle v. Gregory, 629 S.W.2d 919, 920 (Tex.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Turner v. Landyellow2 sentences1987But see, Turner v. Land, 472 S.W.2d 853 (Tex.Civ.App.Tyler 1971, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1987But see, Turner v. Land, 472 S.W.2d 853 (Tex.Civ.App. — Tyler 1971, writ ref’d n.r.e.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roman Ramirez-Memije v. State
green
2 sentences2014Ramirez-Memije, 397 S.W.3d at 297 . 2014Ramirez-Memije, 397 S.W.3d at 297 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Cooper v. State
green
2 sentences2012But, despite its language, the former rule had been construed to apply to an appeal of 'any matter in the case,' regardless of whether the matters were 'defects or errors that occur before or after the entry of the plea.'" Cooper , 45 S.W.3d at 79 n.3 (citing Lyon v. State , 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex. Crim. 2012But, despite its language, the former rule had been construed to apply to an appeal of 'any matter in the case,’ regardless of whether the matters were 'defects or errors that occur before or after the entry of the plea.'" Cooper, 45 S.W.3d at 79 n. 3 (citing Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex.Crim.App.1994)). . | 2 | 2012–2012 |
State of Texas v. Bradford
green
1 sentence2020Bradford, 50 S.W.2d at 1071 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Dixon v. Shirley
green
1 sentence2014In response, IQ relies on Dixon v. Shirley to contend that STC had a duty to disclose the defect in the waiver. 558 S.W.2d 112 (Tex.Civ.App.-Corpus Christi, 1977, writ ref d n.r.e.). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Ferry-Morse Seed Co. v. Hitchcock
green
1 sentence2001This prior version required a claim be filed “within ten days after the defect or violation becomes apparent.” See Ferry-Morse Seed Co., 426 So.2d at 960 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Kolender v. Lawson
green
2 sentences1998But the correct question for vagueness purposes is whether the statute’s language is so unclear that it “encourages,” Kolender, 461 U.S. at 361 , 103 S.Ct. 1855 , or is “an obvious invitation to” arbitrary enforcement. 1998But the correct question for vagueness purposes is whether the statute’s language is so unclear that it “encourages,” Kolender, 461 U.S. at 361 , 103 S.Ct. 1855 , or is “an obvious invitation to” arbitrary enforcement. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.
green
1 sentence1994Id. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Authority
green
1 sentence1985City of Houston, 589 S.W.2d at 679 ; Chandler, 604 S.W.2d at 487 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Chandler v. Carnes Co.
green
1 sentence1985City of Houston, 589 S.W.2d at 679 ; Chandler, 604 S.W.2d at 487 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Gardner v. Martin
green
2 sentences1985We also note that Gardner v. Martin, 162 Tex. 156 , 345 S.W.2d 274 (1961), relied upon in Chandler , has essentially been cit *287 ed by the Texas Supreme Court for the proposition that, if the movant fails to attach certified copies of a prior case to establish a res judicata claim and the non-movant does not point out the omission at the trial level, he may not assign the defect as error on appeal. 1985We also note that Gardner v. Martin, 162 Tex. 156 , 345 S.W.2d 274 (1961), relied upon in Chandler , has essentially been cit *287 ed by the Texas Supreme Court for the proposition that, if the movant fails to attach certified copies of a prior case to establish a res judicata claim and the non-movant does not point out the omission at the trial level, he may not assign the defect as error on appeal. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Wheatheart Feeders, Inc. v. Pletcher
green
1 sentence1980Walker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 131 Tex. 57 , 112 S.W.2d 170 (1938); Wheatheart Feeders, Inc. v. Pletcher, 453 S.W.2d 902 (Tex.Civ.App. — Amarillo 1970, writ dism’d). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Walker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
green
2 sentences1980Walker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 131 Tex. 57 , 112 S.W.2d 170 (1938); Wheatheart Feeders, Inc. v. Pletcher, 453 S.W.2d 902 (Tex.Civ.App. — Amarillo 1970, writ dism’d). 1980Walker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 131 Tex. 57 , 112 S.W.2d 170 (1938); Wheatheart Feeders, Inc. v. Pletcher, 453 S.W.2d 902 (Tex.Civ.App. — Amarillo 1970, writ dism’d). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley
green
2 sentences1927(Tex.Com.App.) 252 S.W. 737 , that when a charge is improper or incomplete, it is not necessary for the party objecting to do more than to object to the manner and form in which the charge is submitted, and there is no duty on appellant's part to tender a charge or issue which will correct the defect or error in the charge given or proposed to be given by the court. 1927App.) 252 S. W. 737 , that when a charge is improper or incomplete, it is not necessary for the party objecting to do more than to object to the manner and form in which the charge is submitted, and there is no duty on appellant’s part to tender a charge or issue which will correct the defect or error in the charge given or proposed to be given by the court. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.