Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1958–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Berkel & Co. v. Leegreen1 sentence2018See Berkel & Co. Contractors, Inc. v. Lee , No. 14-15-00787-CV, 543 S.W.3d 288 , 297-98, 2018 WL 1403545 , at *6 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 23, 2018, no pet.) (explaining that when party raises related charge error and sufficiency complaints, court must first determine whether charge was erroneous). 34 If so, the greatest relief Critical Path could obtain is the new trial it requested in its brief of appellant. | 1 | 1 |
Warren v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Warren v. State, 565 S.W.2d 931, 933 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Thigpen v. Lockegreen1 sentence2013See Thigpen v. Locke, 363 S.W.2d 247, 253 (Tex. 1963) (debtor-creditor relationship alone insufficient to create fiduciary relationship); see also Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, 967 S.W.2d 419, 442 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. denied). 5 When Texas courts have found a fiduciary relationship between a borrower and creditor, “the findings have rested on extraneous facts and conduct, such as excessive lender control or influence in the borrower’s business activities.” Bank One, Texas, N.A., 967 S.W.2d at 442 . | 1 | 1 |
Posey v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Posey v. State, 966 S.W.2d 57, 62 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Healey v. McMeansgreen1 sentence2013Healey v. McMeans, 884 S.W.2d 772, 779 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewartgreen2 sentences2013See Thigpen v. Locke, 363 S.W.2d 247, 253 (Tex. 1963) (debtor-creditor relationship alone insufficient to create fiduciary relationship); see also Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, 967 S.W.2d 419, 442 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. denied). 5 When Texas courts have found a fiduciary relationship between a borrower and creditor, “the findings have rested on extraneous facts and conduct, such as excessive lender control or influence in the borrower’s business activities.” Bank One, Texas, N.A., 967 S.W.2d at 442 . 2013See Thigpen v. Locke, 363 S.W.2d 247, 253 (Tex. 1963) (debtor-creditor relationship alone insufficient to create fiduciary relationship); see also Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, 967 S.W.2d 419, 442 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. denied). 5 When Texas courts have found a fiduciary relationship between a borrower and creditor, “the findings have rested on extraneous facts and conduct, such as excessive lender control or influence in the borrower’s business activities.” Bank One, Texas, N.A., 967 S.W.2d at 442 . | 1 | 1 |
Ngo v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Ngo v. State, 175 S.W.3d 738, 743 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Earls v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See id. | 1 | 1 |
LeDuc v. Stategreen1 sentence1987Le Duc v. State, 593 S.W.2d 678, 685 (Tex.Crim.App.1979); Pitts v. State, 569 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). | 1 | 1 |
Pitts v. Stategreen1 sentence1987Le Duc v. State, 593 S.W.2d 678, 685 (Tex.Crim.App.1979); Pitts v. State, 569 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martinez v. State
green
2 sentences2013Id. 2013Id. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Almanza v. State
green
2 sentences2009When, as in this case, an accused complains of an unobjected-to error in the charge, “he will obtain a reversal only if the error is so egregious and created such harm that he ‘has not had a fair and impartial trial’—in short ‘egregious harm.’” Almanza, 686 S.W.2d at 171 . 2009When, as in this case, an accused complains of an unobjected-to error in the charge, "he will obtain a reversal only if the error is so egregious and created such harm that he 'has not had a fair and impartial trial'--in short 'egregious harm.'" Almanza , 686 S.W.2d at 171 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Gadsden v. State
green
1 sentence2014In support of his contention that the evidence supported an instruction on manslaughter, Reed distinguishes his circumstances from those in Gadsden v. State, 915 S.W.2d 620 , 622–23 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1996, no pet.) (holding trial court did not err by not instructing jury on involuntary manslaughter when jury could not have convicted defendant only of that crime) and Fernandez v. State, No. 14–04–00144–CR, 2005 WL 2076492 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 30, 2005, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (holding that trial court was not required to instruct jury on manslaugh | 1 | 2014–2014 |
SWEED v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 69–70. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Andrade v. NAACP of Austin
green
1 sentence2011Finally, although the voters did not plead it, the court of appeals noted that the voters’ evidence supported a claim that the eSlate does not comply with statutory requirements that the system operate “safely” and “accurately” and that it be “safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.” Tex. Elec.Code § 122.001(a)(3), (4); 287 S.W.3d at 253 n. 10. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Smith v. Texas Co.
green
1 sentence1958Smith v. Texas Co., Tex.Com.App., 53 S.W.2d 774 , Section B, holds that there is presented a fact issue, and that the Court of Civil Appeals is without authority to determine such fact issue. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.