privileges and immunities clause in Texas

16 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1937–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
Edwards v. Californiagreen scotus · 1941 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987See Edwards v. California, 314 U.S. 160 (1941). 1987See Edwards v. California,. 314 U.S. 160 (1941).	2	2
Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.green texapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012We, therefore, do not address the privileges and immunities clause separately but consider it as part of their substantive due process, economic liberty challenge. 18 question bears a real and substantial relation to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the public.” Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 268 S.W.3d 190, 216 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008, no pet.) (emphasis in original). 2012We, therefore, do not address the privileges and immunities clause separately but consider it as part of their substantive due process, economic liberty challenge. 18 question bears a real and substantial relation to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the public.” Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 268 S.W.3d 190, 216 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008, no pet.) (emphasis in original).	1	1
Helinski v. Appleton Papersgreen mdd · 1997 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 1 sentence 1999See Helinski v. Appleton Papers, 952 F.Supp. 266, 274 (D.Md.1997) (although Maryland had a three-year statute of limitations and discovery rule, the court applied Maryland’s borrowing statute so that Virginia’s statute of limitations, with no discovery rule, barred plaintiffs’ claims for latent toxic exposure to carbonless copy paper, and cited Eggen for the proposition that the statute did not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause).	1	1
Williams v. North Carolinagreen scotus · 1943 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990 2 sentences 1990Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 504 , 67 S.Ct. 839, 841 , 91 695 L.Ed. 1055 (1947); Barrett, The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 Calif.L.Rev. 380, 393, n. 60; cf. Broderick v. Rosner, 294 U.S. 629, 643 , 55 S.Ct. 589, 592 , 79 L.Ed. 1100 (1935); Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287, 294, n. 5 , 63 S.Ct. 207, 211, n. 5 , 87 L.Ed. 279 (1942) (under the full faith and credit clause, a state "may in appropriate cases apply the doctrine of `forum non conveniens.'"). 1990Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 504 , 67 S.Ct. 839, 841 , 91 695 L.Ed. 1055 (1947); Barrett, The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 Calif.L.Rev. 380, 393, n. 60; cf. Broderick v. Rosner, 294 U.S. 629, 643 , 55 S.Ct. 589, 592 , 79 L.Ed. 1100 (1935); Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287, 294, n. 5 , 63 S.Ct. 207, 211, n. 5 , 87 L.Ed. 279 (1942) (under the full faith and credit clause, a state "may in appropriate cases apply the doctrine of `forum non conveniens.'").	1	1
Addison v. Addisongreen cal · 1965 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985 2 sentences 1985In Roesch, the California Court of Appeals held that its quasi-community property statute could be constitutionally applied only when two conditions were met: “(1) both parties have changed their domicile to California; and (2) subsequent to the change of domicile, the spouses sought in a California court legal alteration of their marital status.” 83 Cal.App.3d at 107 , 147 Cal.Rptr. at 593 ; see also Addison v. Addison, 62 Cal.2d 558 , 399 P.2d 897 , 43 Cal.Rptr. 97 , (1965) (upholding the constitutionality of California’s quasi-community property statute against constitutional attack based o 1985In Roesch, the California Court of Appeals held that its quasi-community property statute could be constitutionally applied only when two conditions were met: “(1) both parties have changed their domicile to California; and (2) subsequent to the change of domicile, the spouses sought in a California court legal alteration of their marital status.” 83 Cal.App.3d at 107 , 147 Cal.Rptr. at 593 ; see also Addison v. Addison, 62 Cal.2d 558 , 399 P.2d 897 , 43 Cal.Rptr. 97 , (1965) (upholding the constitutionality of California’s quasi-community property statute against constitutional attack based o	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

Case	Cited	Years
Toomer v. Witsell green scotus · 1948 2 sentences 1990The court noted, citing Toomer v. Witsell, 334 U.S. 385 (1948), that "the privileges and immunities clause is not an absolute." Garcia, at 38. 1990The court noted, citing Toomer v. Witsell, 334 U.S. 385 (1948), that "the privileges and immunities clause is not an absolute." Garcia, at 38.	4	1950–1990
Hess v. Pawloski green scotus · 1927 2 sentences 1953Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352 , 47 S.Ct. 632 , 71 L.Ed. 1091 . 1953Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352 , 47 S.Ct. 632 , 71 L.Ed. 1091 .	3	1937–1953
Leonard J. Silver v. Juan Antonio Garcia, Commissioner green ca1 · 1985 2 sentences 1990In Silver v. Garcia, 760 F.2d 33 (1st Cir. 1985) the first circuit court of appeals ruled that Puerto Rico's licensing provisions for insurance consultants requiring that they be Puerto Rico residents violated the privileges and immunities clause (article IV , section 2 , clause 1 , U.S. Constitution). 1990Wrotenbery - Page 8 (JM-1163) In sv., 760 F.2d 33 (1st Cir. 1985) the first circuit court of appeals ruled that Puerto Rico's licensing provisions for insurance consultants requiring that they be Puerto Rico residents violated the privileges and immunities clause (article IV, section 2, clause 1, U.S. Constitution).	2	1990–1990
Christopher v. Harbury green scotus · 2002 1 sentence 2015Ed. 2d 72 (1977). 162 id 163 Christopher v. Harbury, 536 US 403 , 415 n.12 (2002) (noting that the Supreme Court has located the court access right in the Privileges and Immunities clause, the First Amendment petition clause, the Fifth Amendment due process clause, and the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection clause). 164 id 165 City of Houston v. Rhule, 12-0721 (Tex. 11/22/2013) quoting Univ. of Tex. Sw.	1	2015–2015
Saenz v. Roe green scotus · 1999 2 sentences 2009Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489, 500 , 119 S.Ct. 1518 , 143 L.Ed.2d 689 (1999). 2009Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489, 500 , 119 S.Ct. 1518 , 143 L.Ed.2d 689 (1999).	1	2009–2009
Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad green scotus · 1907 2 sentences 1999Id. at 147 , 28 S.Ct. 34 . 1999Id. at 147 , 28 S.Ct. 34 .	1	1999–1999
Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad green scotus · 1929 2 sentences 1999Id. at 386 , 49 S.Ct. 355 . 1999Id. at 386 , 49 S.Ct. 355 .	1	1999–1999
Broderick v. Rosner green scotus · 1935 2 sentences 1990Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 504 , 67 S.Ct. 839, 841 , 91 695 L.Ed. 1055 (1947); Barrett, The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 Calif.L.Rev. 380, 393, n. 60; cf. Broderick v. Rosner, 294 U.S. 629, 643 , 55 S.Ct. 589, 592 , 79 L.Ed. 1100 (1935); Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287, 294, n. 5 , 63 S.Ct. 207, 211, n. 5 , 87 L.Ed. 279 (1942) (under the full faith and credit clause, a state "may in appropriate cases apply the doctrine of `forum non conveniens.'"). 1990Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 504 , 67 S.Ct. 839, 841 , 91 695 L.Ed. 1055 (1947); Barrett, The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 Calif.L.Rev. 380, 393, n. 60; cf. Broderick v. Rosner, 294 U.S. 629, 643 , 55 S.Ct. 589, 592 , 79 L.Ed. 1100 (1935); Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287, 294, n. 5 , 63 S.Ct. 207, 211, n. 5 , 87 L.Ed. 279 (1942) (under the full faith and credit clause, a state "may in appropriate cases apply the doctrine of `forum non conveniens.'").	1	1990–1990
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert red scotus · 1947 2 sentences 1990Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 504 , 67 S.Ct. 839, 841 , 91 695 L.Ed. 1055 (1947); Barrett, The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 Calif.L.Rev. 380, 393, n. 60; cf. Broderick v. Rosner, 294 U.S. 629, 643 , 55 S.Ct. 589, 592 , 79 L.Ed. 1100 (1935); Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287, 294, n. 5 , 63 S.Ct. 207, 211, n. 5 , 87 L.Ed. 279 (1942) (under the full faith and credit clause, a state "may in appropriate cases apply the doctrine of `forum non conveniens.'"). 1990Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 504 , 67 S.Ct. 839, 841 , 91 695 L.Ed. 1055 (1947); Barrett, The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 Calif.L.Rev. 380, 393, n. 60; cf. Broderick v. Rosner, 294 U.S. 629, 643 , 55 S.Ct. 589, 592 , 79 L.Ed. 1100 (1935); Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287, 294, n. 5 , 63 S.Ct. 207, 211, n. 5 , 87 L.Ed. 279 (1942) (under the full faith and credit clause, a state "may in appropriate cases apply the doctrine of `forum non conveniens.'").	1	1990–1990
United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of Camden green scotus · 1984 1 sentence 1987In the course of discussing the factors to be considered in deciding whether a substantial reason for the statutory difference existed in the City of Camden case, and whether it bore a substantial relationship to the state's objective sufficient to avoid a Privileges and Immunities Clause violation, the Court said: The fact that Camden is expending its own funds or funds it administers in accordance with the terms of a grant is certainly a factor — perhaps the crucial factor — to be considered in evaluating whether the statute's discrimination violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause. 465	1	1987–1987
In Re Marriage of Roesch green calctapp · 1978 2 sentences 1985In Roesch, the California Court of Appeals held that its quasi-community property statute could be constitutionally applied only when two conditions were met: “(1) both parties have changed their domicile to California; and (2) subsequent to the change of domicile, the spouses sought in a California court legal alteration of their marital status.” 83 Cal.App.3d at 107 , 147 Cal.Rptr. at 593 ; see also Addison v. Addison, 62 Cal.2d 558 , 399 P.2d 897 , 43 Cal.Rptr. 97 , (1965) (upholding the constitutionality of California’s quasi-community property statute against constitutional attack based o 1985In Roesch, the California Court of Appeals held that its quasi-community property statute could be constitutionally applied only when two conditions were met: “(1) both parties have changed their domicile to California; and (2) subsequent to the change of domicile, the spouses sought in a California court legal alteration of their marital status.” 83 Cal.App.3d at 107 , 147 Cal.Rptr. at 593 ; see also Addison v. Addison, 62 Cal.2d 558 , 399 P.2d 897 , 43 Cal.Rptr. 97 , (1965) (upholding the constitutionality of California’s quasi-community property statute against constitutional attack based o	1	1985–1985
Toomer v. Witsell green southcarolinaed · 1947 1 sentence 1950The Depuglio case rested largely on the three-judge court decision in Toomer v. Witsell, D.C., 73 F. Supp. 371 , sustaining a somewhat similar statute of South Carolina, but that case was subsequently reversed in its pertinent part by the federal Supreme Court, which held the statute to violate the privileges and immunities clause, Art. 4, § 2, of the Federal Constitution. 334 U.S. 385 , 68 S.Ct. 1156 , 92 L.Ed. 1460 .	1	1950–1950
Steed v. Dodgen green txwd · 1949 1 sentence 1950Still later, the very statute upheld by us was declared vio-lative of the Federal Constitution by a three-judge court in Steed v. Dodgen, 5 Cir., 85 F.Supp. 956 on the strength of the final decision in Toomer v. Witsell; these two cases 'being evidently the occasion for enactment of the substitute legislation now before us.	1	1950–1950
Morris v. Duby green scotus · 1927 2 sentences 1938Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352 , 47 S.Ct. 632 , 71 L.Ed. 1091 ; Morris v. Duby, 274 U.S. 135 , 47 S.Ct. 548, 550 , 71 L.Ed. 966 ; L. & L. 1938Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352 , 47 S.Ct. 632 , 71 L.Ed. 1091 ; Morris v. Duby, 274 U.S. 135 , 47 S.Ct. 548, 550 , 71 L.Ed. 966 ; L. & L.	1	1938–1938

Where else courts name it

WA 114 (1940–2026) CA 32 (1944–2024) IN 21 (1902–2020) NY 20 (1935–2018) TX 16 (1937–2015) AK 15 (1977–2019) MA 14 (1946–2009) FL 12 (1940–1992) PA 11 (1951–2025) WI 10 (1971–2020) IL 9 (1983–2010) CT 9 (1977–2024) AR 8 (1964–2014) OR 8 (1974–2022) ND 6 (1955–2008) WV 6 (1982–2006) OH 6 (1958–2017) IA 6 (1932–2024) WY 6 (1985–2022) AZ 6 (1965–2023) LA 6 (1957–2018) ME 5 (1935–1998) NC 5 (1941–1994) MN 4 (1918–1992) MT 4 (1981–1992) NE 4 (1979–2003) NJ 4 (1954–1981) MO 4 (1940–2016) MD 3 (1976–2009) MI 2 (2001–2001) CO 2 (1929–1994) MS 2 (1988–2003) SD 2 (1970–1985) OK 2 (1989–2000) NH 2 (1980–1986) KS 2 (1982–1985) TN 2 (1955–2017) HI 2 (1969–1996) PR 2 (1945–1954) RI 2 (1949–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check