Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kelly v. Stategreen2 sentences2003The present case involves the admissibility of scientific evidence under Texas Rule of Evidence 702 and Kelly v. State. [1] Specifically, we granted the State's following three grounds for review: 1) Must a party seeking to introduce evidence of a scientific principle always present evidence sufficient to satisfy the test of Kelly v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), regardless of the particular scientific principle? 2) Where either the Court of Criminal Appeals or a court of appeals has determined the validity of a particular scientific principle and a technique applying that principle 2003The present case involves the admissibility of scientific evidence under Texas Rule of Evidence 702 and Kelly v. State. [1] Specifically, we granted the State's following three grounds for review: 1) Must a party seeking to introduce evidence of a scientific principle always present evidence sufficient to satisfy the test of Kelly v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), regardless of the particular scientific principle? 2) Where either the Court of Criminal Appeals or a court of appeals has determined the validity of a particular scientific principle and a technique applying that principle | 8 | 12 |
Nancy Dickenson, Conservator for Sandra Robinson v. Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery of Eastern Tennessee, P.C. And Robert Rosser, M.D.green1 sentence2015Tenn., 388 F.3d 976, 980-82 (6th Cir. 2004) (holding that district court abused discretion by excluding physician’s testimony based on extensive, relevant experience despite absence of medical literature supporting opinion). 1367 Turner v. Iowa Fire Equip. | 1 | 1 |
EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2014E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549, 557 (Tex. 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Sanders v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Kelly v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568, 573 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); Sanders v. State, 191 S.W.3d 272, 277 (Tex.App.-Waco 2006), cert. denied 549 U.S. 1167 , 127 S.Ct. 1141 , 166 L.Ed.2d 893 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. John W. Downinggreen1 sentence1990See Gianelli, The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v. United States, a Half-Century Later, 80 Colum.L.Rev. 1197, 1200-01 (1980); see also United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224, 1234 (3rd Cir.1985); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 987 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Castrogreen2 sentences1990See Gianelli, The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v. United States, a Half-Century Later, 80 Colum.L.Rev. 1197, 1200-01 (1980); see also United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224, 1234 (3rd Cir.1985); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 987 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989). 1990See Gianelli, The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v. United States, a Half-Century Later, 80 Colum.L.Rev. 1197, 1200-01 (1980); see also United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224, 1234 (3rd Cir.1985); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 987 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kelly v. State
green
2 sentences1992More specifically, the court of appeals “found” that the DNA evidence was reliable, and thus admissible, “since expert testimony established the underlying scientific principle was valid, the technique applying the principle was valid, and the technique was properly applied for tests in this case.” Kelly v. State, 792 S.W.2d at 585 . 1992More specifically, the court of appeals "found" that the DNA evidence was reliable, and thus admissible, "since expert testimony established the underlying scientific principle was valid, the technique applying the principle was valid, and the technique was properly applied for tests in this case." Kelly v. State, 792 S.W.2d at 585 . | 3 | 1990–1992 |
IROMUANYA v. Nebraska
green
1 sentence2008Kelly v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568, 573 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); Sanders v. State, 191 S.W.3d 272, 277 (Tex.App.-Waco 2006), cert. denied 549 U.S. 1167 , 127 S.Ct. 1141 , 166 L.Ed.2d 893 (2007). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Sanders v. Texas
green
2 sentences2008Kelly v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568, 573 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); Sanders v. State, 191 S.W.3d 272, 277 (Tex.App.-Waco 2006), cert. denied 549 U.S. 1167 , 127 S.Ct. 1141 , 166 L.Ed.2d 893 (2007). 2008Kelly v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568, 573 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); Sanders v. State, 191 S.W.3d 272, 277 (Tex.App.-Waco 2006), cert. denied 549 U.S. 1167 , 127 S.Ct. 1141 , 166 L.Ed.2d 893 (2007). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Emerson v. State
green
1 sentence2000Emerson, 880 S.W.2d at 764 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.