aggravating or mitigating factors (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

aggravating or mitigating factors in Washington

16 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Anschellgreen
wash · 2000 · cited in 10 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2003–2008
2 sentences

2008In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Anschell, 141 Wn.2d 593, 615 , 9 P.3d 193 (2000).

2008In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Anschell, 141 Wn.2d 593, 615 , 9 P.3d 193 (2000).

210

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Yousoufian v. Office of Ron Sims green
wash · 2010
2 sentences

2018The Supreme Court’s holding that the Yousoufian factors “may not apply equally or at all in every case,” 168 Wn.2d at 468 , authorizes a trial court in an appropriate case to attribute more weight to the ninth aggravating factor, which does take deterrence and the size of the agency into consideration, than to other factors that do not.

2018The Supreme Court’s holding that the Yousoufian factors “may not apply equally or at all in every case,” 168 Wn.2d at 468 , authorizes a trial court in an appropriate case to attribute more weight to the ninth aggravating factor, which does take deterrence and the size of the agency into consideration, than to other factors that do not.

22018–2018
Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Burtch green
wash · 2008
2 sentences

2010While his apology was the right thing to do, it came too late to deserve mitigation. (c) Balancing the aggravators and mitigators ¶67 “The Board should deviate from the presumptive sanction only if the aggravating or mitigating factors are sufficiently compelling to justify a departure.” In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Burtch, 162 Wn.2d 873, 899 , 175 P.3d 1070 (2008).

2010While his apology was the right thing to do, it came too late to deserve mitigation. (c) Balancing the aggravators and mitigators ¶67 “The Board should deviate from the presumptive sanction only if the aggravating or mitigating factors are sufficiently compelling to justify a departure.” In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Burtch, 162 Wn.2d 873, 899 , 175 P.3d 1070 (2008).

22010–2010
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cohen green
wash · 2003
2 sentences

2010In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cohen, 149 Wn.2d 323, 339 , 67 P.3d 1086 (2003).

2010In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cohen, 149 Wn.2d 323, 339 , 67 P.3d 1086 (2003).

22010–2010

Where else courts name it

WA 16 (2003–2018) NJ 7 (1992–2025) IL 7 (1983–2010) NY 7 (1988–2022) CA 3 (1985–1989) CO 3 (1994–2000) IN 3 (1984–1995) AK 2 (1987–2007) AZ 2 (1994–2004) IA 2 (2016–2016) MN 2 (2002–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check