Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rhode Island v. Innisgreen2 sentences2025The circuit court did not err by finding the initial portions of the 911 calls admissible as present sense impressions. ¶21 Finally we address Holmes’ contention that the circuit court erred by admitting the statements he made at the scene of the accident, in the squad car, and at the hospital because he was not given Miranda warnings. 9 No. 2024AP1121-CR ¶22 Miranda warnings6 are necessary to protect a person’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination when he or she is subject to a “custodial interrogation.” Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 297 (1980) 2024We agree with the State. ¶19 Miranda warnings5 are necessary to protect a person’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination when he or she is subject to a “custodial interrogation.” Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 297 (1980). | 4 | 4 |
Berkemer v. McCartygreen2 sentences2025Custodial interrogation refers to “questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.” Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 428 (1984). 2024Custodial interrogation refers to “questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.” Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 428 (1984). | 2 | 2 |
Ross v. Oklahomagreen2 sentences1999The United States Supreme Court considered an analogous Fourteenth Amendment challenge in Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81 (1988). 1999The United States Supreme Court considered an analogous Fourteenth Amendment challenge in Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81 (1988). | 2 | 2 |
Miranda v. Arizonagreen2 sentences2010"In Miranda [v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)], the United States Supreme Court held that law enforcement officers conducting a custodial interrogation must employ procedural safeguards sufficient to protect a defendant's Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination." State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331, 351 , 588 N.W.2d 606 (1999) (citations and quotation marks omitted). 1999In Miranda , the United States Supreme Court held that law enforcement officers conducting a "custodial interrogation" must employ "procedural safeguards" sufficient to protect a defendant's Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination. 23 Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444 ; see also Innis, 446 U.S. at 297 . | 1 | 3 |
Whitley v. Albersgreen1 sentence1999In order to prevail on his Eighth Amendment claim, Casteel must show that the defendants, by subjecting him to strip searches at the times and under the circumstances before us, caused "the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.'" See Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312, 319 (1986) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Batson v. Kentuckygreen2 sentences1995In his initial appeal, Horton acknowledged that a Fourteenth Amendment challenge to the State's use of its peremptory strike would fail because under the applicable law at the time, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 96 (1986), a defendant could only challenge the strikes of jurors who were of the same race as the defendant. 1995In his initial appeal, Horton acknowledged that a Fourteenth Amendment challenge to the State's use of its peremptory strike would fail because under the applicable law at the time, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 96 (1986), a defendant could only challenge the strikes of jurors who were of the same race as the defendant. | 1 | 1 |
Zinermon v. Burchgreen2 sentences1993Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 125 (1990). 1993Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 125 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montanagreen1 sentence1991In their brief, under the section claiming a fourteenth amendment violation, Consolidated discusses the four element test of Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 (1977), restated in Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana, *771 453 U.S. 609, 617 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Swain v. Alabamared2 sentences1979Swain, supra at 774. [Emphasis supplied.] This court is in agreement with the reasoning in Swain . 1979Swain, supra at 774. [Emphasis supplied.] This court is in agreement with the reasoning in Swain . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Armstrong
green
2 sentences2010"In Miranda [v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)], the United States Supreme Court held that law enforcement officers conducting a custodial interrogation must employ procedural safeguards sufficient to protect a defendant's Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination." State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331, 351 , 588 N.W.2d 606 (1999) (citations and quotation marks omitted). 2010"In Miranda [v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)], the United States Supreme Court held that law enforcement officers conducting a custodial interrogation must employ procedural safeguards sufficient to protect a defendant's Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination." State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331, 351 , 588 N.W.2d 606 (1999) (citations and quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Wisconsin v. Yoder
green
2 sentences2006In Yoder , a case that involved both a Fourteenth Amendment claim based on a parent's right to direct the education and upbringing of children and a claim based on the Free Exercise of Religion Clause, the Supreme Court held that Wisconsin could not compel Amish children to attend school beyond age fourteen. 406 U.S. at 232-35 . 2006In Yoder , a case that involved both a Fourteenth Amendment claim based on a parent's right to direct the education and upbringing of children and a claim based on the Free Exercise of Religion Clause, the Supreme Court held that Wisconsin could not compel Amish children to attend school beyond age fourteen. 406 U.S. at 232-35 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Oregon v. Mathiason
green
1 sentence1999The Court spelled out a list of "procedural safeguards" which it considered sufficient; these safeguards are commonly called"Miranda warnings." 24 Law enforcement officers must administer Miranda warnings at the first *352 moment an individual is subjected to "custodial interrogation." Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444, 477 ; see also Innis, 446 U.S. at 300 ; Mathiason, 429 U.S. at 495 ; Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d at 686 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Mitchell
green
1 sentence1999The Court spelled out a list of "procedural safeguards" which it considered sufficient; these safeguards are commonly called"Miranda warnings." 24 Law enforcement officers must administer Miranda warnings at the first *352 moment an individual is subjected to "custodial interrogation." Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444, 477 ; see also Innis, 446 U.S. at 300 ; Mathiason, 429 U.S. at 495 ; Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d at 686 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Horton
green
2 sentences1995Horton, 151 Wis. 2d at 257 , 445 N.W.2d at 50 . 1995Horton, 151 Wis. 2d at 257 , 445 N.W.2d at 50 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady
green
1 sentence1991In their brief, under the section claiming a fourteenth amendment violation, Consolidated discusses the four element test of Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 (1977), restated in Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana, *771 453 U.S. 609, 617 (1981). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Few v. State
green
1 sentence1980By the Court. — Judgment affirmed. 1 Defendant relies on Aycock v. State, 146 Ga. App. 489 , 246 S.E.2d 489 (1978); People v. Campbell, 72 Mich. App. 411 , 249 N.W.2d 870 (1976); and Few v. State, 588 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People v. Campbell
green
2 sentences1980By the Court. — Judgment affirmed. 1 Defendant relies on Aycock v. State, 146 Ga. App. 489 , 246 S.E.2d 489 (1978); People v. Campbell, 72 Mich. App. 411 , 249 N.W.2d 870 (1976); and Few v. State, 588 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. 1980By the Court. — Judgment affirmed. 1 Defendant relies on Aycock v. State, 146 Ga. App. 489 , 246 S.E.2d 489 (1978); People v. Campbell, 72 Mich. App. 411 , 249 N.W.2d 870 (1976); and Few v. State, 588 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Aycock v. State
green
2 sentences1980By the Court. — Judgment affirmed. 1 Defendant relies on Aycock v. State, 146 Ga. App. 489 , 246 S.E.2d 489 (1978); People v. Campbell, 72 Mich. App. 411 , 249 N.W.2d 870 (1976); and Few v. State, 588 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. 1980By the Court. — Judgment affirmed. 1 Defendant relies on Aycock v. State, 146 Ga. App. 489 , 246 S.E.2d 489 (1978); People v. Campbell, 72 Mich. App. 411 , 249 N.W.2d 870 (1976); and Few v. State, 588 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
green
2 sentences1978That is the essence of the Wisconsin Supreme Court's holding in Wisconsin Telephone, 68 Wis.2d at 367 , where the court said that *82 in interpreting Wisconsin’s sex discrimination statutes “the department is not limited to finding discrimination only where a Fourteenth Amendment violation could also be found,” notwithstanding the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Geduldig that a pregnancy exclusion from a disability insurance system does not deny equal protection under that amendment. 1978That is the essence of the Wisconsin Supreme Court's holding in Wisconsin Telephone, 68 Wis.2d at 367 , where the court said that *82 in interpreting Wisconsin’s sex discrimination statutes “the department is not limited to finding discrimination only where a Fourteenth Amendment violation could also be found,” notwithstanding the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Geduldig that a pregnancy exclusion from a disability insurance system does not deny equal protection under that amendment. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Christoph v. City of Chilton
green
2 sentences1938But I think the act is unconstitutional because discriminatory under the Fourteenth amendment under the rule of Christoph v. Chilton, 205 Wis. 418 , 237 N. W. 134 . 1938But I think the act is unconstitutional because discriminatory under the Fourteenth amendment under the rule of Christoph v. Chilton, 205 Wis. 418 , 237 N. W. 134 . | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.