Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Arnold v. Camden News Publishing Co.green2 sentences2009While we acknowledged the modification, we explained that “the court had 'consistently interpreted’ the rule as containing a diligence requirement, and ‘once this court has interpreted its rules or statutes, that interpretation subsequently becomes a part of the rule or statute itself.’ ” Id. at 228 , 200 S.W.3d at 448 (quoting Arnold, 353 Ark. at 528 , 110 S.W.3d at 272 ). 2004As discussed above, the court has “consistently interpreted” the rule as containing a diligence requirement, and “once this court has interpreted its rules or statutes, that interpretation subsequently becomes a part of the rule or statute itself.” Arnold, 353 Ark. at 528 (emphasis in original). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Larimoregreen2 sentences2013See also State v. Larimore, 341 Ark. 397 , 17 S.W.3d 87 (2000). 2013See also State v. Larimore, 341 Ark. 397 , 17 S.W.3d 87 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Echols v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See, e.g., Echols, 354 Ark. 414 , 125 S.W.3d 153 . 2013See, e.g., Echols, 354 Ark. 414 , 125 S.W.3d 153 . | 1 | 1 |
Chickasaw Chemical Co. v. Beasleygreen2 sentences2003See Chickasaw Chemical v. Beasley, 328 Ark. 472 , 944 S.W.2d 511 (1997). 2003See Chickasaw Chemical v. Beasley, 328 Ark. 472 , 944 S.W.2d 511 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roberts v. State
green
2 sentences2019Roberts , 2013 Ark. 56 , 425 S.W.3d 771 . 2019Roberts , 2013 Ark. 56 , 425 S.W.3d 771 . | 8 | 2015–2019 |
Makkali v. State
green
2 sentences2020Id. 2019Id. | 2 | 2019–2020 |
Arkco Corp. v. Askew
green
2 sentences2009While we acknowledged the modification, we explained that “the court had 'consistently interpreted’ the rule as containing a diligence requirement, and ‘once this court has interpreted its rules or statutes, that interpretation subsequently becomes a part of the rule or statute itself.’ ” Id. at 228 , 200 S.W.3d at 448 (quoting Arnold, 353 Ark. at 528 , 110 S.W.3d at 272 ). 2009While we acknowledged the modification, we explained that “the court had 'consistently interpreted’ the rule as containing a diligence requirement, and ‘once this court has interpreted its rules or statutes, that interpretation subsequently becomes a part of the rule or statute itself.’ ” Id. at 228 , 200 S.W.3d at 448 (quoting Arnold, 353 Ark. at 528 , 110 S.W.3d at 272 ). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Thacker v. State
green
2 sentences1983Thacker v. State, 253 Ark. 864 , 489 S.W.2d 500 (1973). 1983Thacker v. State, 253 Ark. 864 , 489 S.W.2d 500 (1973). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.