15 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
DEP. OF MENTAL HEALTH & DEV. DIS. v. Civil Serv. Comm'ngreen2 sentences2015Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities v. Civil Service Comm'n, 85 Ill. 2d 547, 550 (1981). 2015Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities v. Civil Service Comm'n, 85 Ill. 2d 547, 550 (1981). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Veseygreen1 sentence2026According to the majority, a trial court must first determine whether the record contains sufficient evidence of excessive force. 2024 IL App (4th) 230401, ¶ 28 (majority opinion). | 1 | 1 |
Ehlers v. Jackson County Sheriff's Merit Commissiongreen1 sentence2026Ehlers v. Jackson County Sheriff’s Merit Comm’n, 183 Ill. 2d 83, 89 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Kinggreen1 sentence2025Same Physical Act ¶ 64 Pursuant to the one-act, one-crime doctrine a defendant cannot be convicted of multiple offenses “carved from the same physical act,” where the “act” is defined as “any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different offense.” People v. King, 66 Ill. 2d 551, 566 (1977). 24 To determine whether multiple convictions may properly be entered, courts must engage in a two- step analysis. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Rodriguezgreen1 sentence2021People v. Rodriguez, 169 Ill. 2d 183, 186 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
Minch v. Georgegreen1 sentence2021Minch v. George, 395 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Kansas v. Hendricksgreen1 sentence2018The first step “ascertain[s] whether the legislature meant the statute to establish ‘civil’ proceedings.” Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 361 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Millergreen1 sentence2017See Miller, 238 Ill. 2d at 165 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Patrick
green
1 sentence2023Id. at 74-76 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Heatherly v. Rodman & Renshaw, Inc.
green
1 sentence2021There was no express “determination” in that case that the public policy exception applied. ¶ 33 The court in Heatherly included more discussion of the exception, beginning with the two- step test used to determine if the award violated public policy. 287 Ill. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
People v. Coats
green
1 sentence2020People v. Coats, 2018 IL 121926, ¶ 12 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Nunez
green
1 sentence2017Pursuant to our de novo review (Nunez, 236 Ill. 2d at 493 ), we will apply this two- step analysis to the offenses of home invasion and residential burglary. ¶ 26 First, we must determine whether the conduct by which defendant committed these two offenses consisted of “precisely the same physical act” as opposed to multiple physical acts. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Merrifield v. Illinois State Police Merit Board
green
1 sentence2014Merrifield v. Illinois State Police Merit Board, 294 Ill. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Siwek v. POLICE BD. OF CITY OF CHICAGO
green
1 sentence2011Siwek v. Police Board, 374 Ill. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
People v. Bridgeforth
green
2 sentences1977(People v. Bridgeforth (1972), 51 Ill. 2d 52, 63 , 281 N.E.2d 617, 623 ; People v. Hairston (1970), 46 Ill. 2d 348 , 263 N.E.2d 840 .) Thus, the trial court’s discretion is measured by a two step test, namely, the testimony sought to be presented must be material to the case, and the defendant must not have been at fault in the violation of the order excluding the witnesses. 1977(People v. Bridgeforth (1972), 51 Ill. 2d 52, 63 , 281 N.E.2d 617, 623 ; People v. Hairston (1970), 46 Ill. 2d 348 , 263 N.E.2d 840 .) Thus, the trial court’s discretion is measured by a two step test, namely, the testimony sought to be presented must be material to the case, and the defendant must not have been at fault in the violation of the order excluding the witnesses. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
The People v. Hairston
green
2 sentences1977(People v. Bridgeforth (1972), 51 Ill. 2d 52, 63 , 281 N.E.2d 617, 623 ; People v. Hairston (1970), 46 Ill. 2d 348 , 263 N.E.2d 840 .) Thus, the trial court’s discretion is measured by a two step test, namely, the testimony sought to be presented must be material to the case, and the defendant must not have been at fault in the violation of the order excluding the witnesses. 1977(People v. Bridgeforth (1972), 51 Ill. 2d 52, 63 , 281 N.E.2d 617, 623 ; People v. Hairston (1970), 46 Ill. 2d 348 , 263 N.E.2d 840 .) Thus, the trial court’s discretion is measured by a two step test, namely, the testimony sought to be presented must be material to the case, and the defendant must not have been at fault in the violation of the order excluding the witnesses. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.