Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kaufman Ex Rel. Kaufman v. Bormastergreen2 sentences1990Initially, we note that “review of a summary judgment is a two step analysis: first, whether there is a genuine issue of material fact requiring trial, and second, whether the prevailing party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Kaufman v. Bormaster, 599 S.W.2d 35, 37 (Mo.App.E.D.1980); Rule 74.04(c). 1982Kaw Valley State Bank & Trust v. Commercial Bank of Liberty, 567 S.W.2d 710 (Mo.App.1978). “[RJeview of a summary judgment is a two step analysis; first, whether there is genuine issue of material fact requiring trial, and second, whether the prevailing party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Kaufman v. Bormaster, 599 S.W.2d 35 at 27 . | 1 | 2 |
In Re JLMgreen1 sentence2019In re J.L.M., 64 S.W.3d 923, 924 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Murphy v. Carrongreen1 sentence2013Malawey, 137 S.W.3d at 527 ; see also Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc.1976). | 1 | 1 |
Watlow Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Sam Dick Industries, Inc.green1 sentence2000Mfg. v. Sam Dick Indus., 734 S.W.2d 295, 296-97 (Mo.App.1987)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Higginsgreen1 sentence1990Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S.Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d. 1247 (1968); State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 159 (Mo. banc 1979), appeal dismissed, 446 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 1825 , 64 L.Ed.2d 254 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
Weiler v. Weilergreen1 sentence1988In State v. Smith, 704 S.W.2d 290, 291 (Mo.App.1986) we recited “the legal principles pertinent to the admissibility of identification testimony” stating that a two step analysis is required. | 1 | 1 |
Seliga Shoe Stores, Inc. v. City of Maplewoodgreen1 sentence1980For the purpose of summary judgment, a genuine issue of fact exists whenever there is the slightest doubt as to a material fact, Seliga Shoe Stores v. City of Maplewood, 558 S.W.2d 328, 331 (Mo.App.1977), and a material fact is one which as legal probative force relevant to the controlling issue. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Malawey v. Malawey
green
1 sentence2013Malawey, 137 S.W.3d at 527 ; see also Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc.1976). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Shirkey v. McMaster
green
1 sentence2000Shirkey v. McMaster, 876 S.W.2d 648 (Mo.App.1994) held that “[i]n passing on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over a non-resident, a two step inquiry is necessary: first, whether the defendant committed one of the acts enumerated in the long arm statute; and second, whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction would violate due process.” (citing Watlow Elec. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Simmons v. United States
green
2 sentences1990Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S.Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d. 1247 (1968); State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 159 (Mo. banc 1979), appeal dismissed, 446 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 1825 , 64 L.Ed.2d 254 (1980). 1990Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S.Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d. 1247 (1968); State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 159 (Mo. banc 1979), appeal dismissed, 446 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 1825 , 64 L.Ed.2d 254 (1980). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Jackson v. Wisconsin
green
2 sentences1990Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S.Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d. 1247 (1968); State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 159 (Mo. banc 1979), appeal dismissed, 446 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 1825 , 64 L.Ed.2d 254 (1980). 1990Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S.Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d. 1247 (1968); State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 159 (Mo. banc 1979), appeal dismissed, 446 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 1825 , 64 L.Ed.2d 254 (1980). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Higgins v. Missouri
green
1 sentence1990Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S.Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d. 1247 (1968); State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 159 (Mo. banc 1979), appeal dismissed, 446 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 1825 , 64 L.Ed.2d 254 (1980). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Kaw Valley State Bank & Trust v. Commercial Bank of Liberty, N.A.
green
1 sentence1982Kaw Valley State Bank & Trust v. Commercial Bank of Liberty, 567 S.W.2d 710 (Mo.App.1978). “[RJeview of a summary judgment is a two step analysis; first, whether there is genuine issue of material fact requiring trial, and second, whether the prevailing party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Kaufman v. Bormaster, 599 S.W.2d 35 at 27 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.