15 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Waltersgreen2 sentences1982State v. Walters, 408 So.2d 1337 (La.1982) permitted discovery of the names and addresses of the state's witnesses because C.Cr.P. art. 723 does not prohibit the same. *452 This writer is of the opinion that it is wrong to permit discovery of this information because the defense is not entitled to such information for any reason. 1982See my dissent in State v. Walters, supra. If the defendant was not entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment, this writer would be for unlimited discovery by either the accused or the state. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Perkinsgreen1 sentence1994United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 106-08 , 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2399 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v. Perkins, 423 So.2d 1103, 1107 (La.1982); State v. Yancy, 465 So.2d 48, 51 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ den. 469 So.2d 985 (La.1985). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Yancygreen1 sentence1994United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 106-08 , 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2399 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v. Perkins, 423 So.2d 1103, 1107 (La.1982); State v. Yancy, 465 So.2d 48, 51 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ den. 469 So.2d 985 (La.1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences1997Hogan contends that the failure to disclose this information was a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).when it denied the Motion for a Mistrial made at the conclusion of the State’s opening statement. 1997Hogan contends that the failure to disclose this information was a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).when it denied the Motion for a Mistrial made at the conclusion of the State’s opening statement. | 3 | 1977–1997 |
State v. Cobb
green
2 sentences1994State v. Cobb, supra at 1241 . 1990United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 , 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v. Cobb, supra. Under LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 718 the defendant may inspect and copy tangible items, including documents, books and papers, which are within the state's control and are favorable to the defense. | 2 | 1990–1994 |
United States v. Agurs
green
2 sentences1994United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 106-08 , 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2399 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v. Perkins, 423 So.2d 1103, 1107 (La.1982); State v. Yancy, 465 So.2d 48, 51 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ den. 469 So.2d 985 (La.1985). 1994United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 106-08 , 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2399 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v. Perkins, 423 So.2d 1103, 1107 (La.1982); State v. Yancy, 465 So.2d 48, 51 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ den. 469 So.2d 985 (La.1985). | 2 | 1990–1994 |
Giglio v. United States
green
2 sentences2020Brown argues that the State withholding this information was a violation of Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 (1972), which held that the prosecution is bound to give impeachment evidence to an accused. 2020Brown argues that the State withholding this information was a violation of Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 (1972), which held that the prosecution is bound to give impeachment evidence to an accused. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Verret
green
2 sentences2011Id. 2011Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.
green
1 sentence2011Additionally, in Saucier, 373 So.2d at 118 , the court stated (emphasis added) (footnote omitted): The amount prescribed in the contingency fee contract, not quantum meruit, is the proper frame of reference for fixing compensation for the attorney prematurely discharged without cause. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Simmons
green
1 sentence2004The fourth circuit reviewed a defendant’s right of access to the information in a presentence investigation report at length in State v. Simmons, 466 So.2d 777 (La.App. 4 Cir.1985). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Bass
green
1 sentence2003He contends that this is error patent and that his conviction must be reversed and his sentence set aside, relying upon State v. Bass, 509 So.2d 176 (La.App. 1st Cir.1987). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA
green
1 sentence1994The cases of Laing v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 628 So.2d 196 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993), writ denied, 94-0375 (La. 3/25/94); 635 So.2d 239 , and Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., 539 So.2d 696 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989), are distinguishable from this case. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Laing v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC.
green
1 sentence1994The cases of Laing v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 628 So.2d 196 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993), writ denied, 94-0375 (La. 3/25/94); 635 So.2d 239 , and Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., 539 So.2d 696 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989), are distinguishable from this case. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Laing v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence1994The cases of Laing v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 628 So.2d 196 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993), writ denied, 94-0375 (La. 3/25/94); 635 So.2d 239 , and Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., 539 So.2d 696 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989), are distinguishable from this case. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Jordan v. Sweeney
green
1 sentence1994United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 106-08 , 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2399 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v. Perkins, 423 So.2d 1103, 1107 (La.1982); State v. Yancy, 465 So.2d 48, 51 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ den. 469 So.2d 985 (La.1985). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Banks
green
2 sentences1989While admission of this information was error, see State v. Banks, 439 So.2d 407 (La.1983), it does not require a reversal of the defendant’s conviction. 1989Unlike Banks, supra, where the confidential informant’s statement was the sole piece of evidence linking the defendant to the crime, several officers observed Mr. Johnson carrying out what appeared to be drug related transactions. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Ivy
green
1 sentence1977State v. Ivy, supra . *631 Defendant nevertheless argues that he is entitled to this information under the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence1977We rejected a similar contention in State v. Williams, 310 So.2d 528 (La.1975). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.