48 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1896–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Caldwellgreen2 sentences1975The essentials have been complied with if an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule.’ (People v. Doyle, 20 Ill.2d 163, 167 ; see also People v. Caldwell, 55 Ill.2d 152, 156 .) We judge that a review of the record shows that the trial court satisfied the requirements of Rule 402 in informing the accused of and determining that he understood the nature of the charge against him.” (Emphasis added.) (People v. Krantz (1974), 58 Ill.2d 187, 192, 193 , 317 N.E.2d 559 .) In Krantz, the court had merely inquired of th 1974The essentials have beeen complied with if an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule.’ (People v. Doyle, 20 Ill.2d 163 ,.167; see also People v. Caldwell, 55 Ill.2d 152, 156 .)” The .indictments in this case were not couched in technical words. | 3 | 3 |
People v. Krantzgreen2 sentences2020App. 3d 243, 263 (2009). ¶ 30 “The essentials have been complied with if an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule.” Krantz, 58 Ill. 2d at 193 . 1989App. 3d 1140 , 443 N.E. 2d 699 ; see also People v. McCoy (1979), 74 Ill. 2d 398 , 385 N.E. 2d 696 ); that Rule 402 requires only substantial and not literal compliance (People v. Krantz (1974), 58 Ill. 2d 187 , 317 N.E .2d 559); and that the judge’s remarks must be read in a practical and realistic manner to determine whether an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule. | 2 | 8 |
People v. Fostergreen2 sentences2011See People v. Foster, 76 Ill.2d 365, 384 , 29 Ill.Dec. 449 , 392 N.E.2d 6 (1979) ("Defense counsel knew of [the witness's] statement before he took the stand. 2011See People v. Foster, 76 Ill.2d 365, 384 , 29 Ill.Dec. 449 , 392 N.E.2d 6 (1979) ("Defense counsel knew of [the witness's] statement before he took the stand. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Hintongreen2 sentences2000See People v. Hinton, 302 Ill.App.3d 614, 623 , 236 Ill.Dec. 143 , 706 N.E.2d 1017 (1998). 2000See People v. Hinton, 302 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
The People v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2018People v. Morris, 135 Ill. 2d 540, 547-48 (1990); Strait, 72 Ill. 2d at 505-06 (finding that an indictment or information is fatally defective when it is filed after the statute of limitations has expired); People v. Day, 404 Ill. 268, 270 (1949) (same); People v. Taylor, 391 Ill. 11, 14 (1945) (same). ¶ 45 Finally, before the appellate court, the State additionally contended that its reference to defendant’s use of a false identification in the information qualified as an exception to the limitations period applicable when a criminal defendant “is not usually and publicly resident within this 2017People v. Morris , 135 Ill.2d 540 , 547-48, 143 Ill.Dec. 215 , 554 N.E.2d 150 (1990) ; Strait , 72 Ill.2d at 505 -06 , 21 Ill.Dec. 365 , 381 N.E.2d 692 (finding that an indictment or information is fatally defective when it is filed after the statute of limitations has expired); People v. Day , 404 Ill. 268 , 270, 88 N.E.2d 727 (1949) (same); People v. Taylor , 391 Ill. 11 , 14, 62 N.E.2d 683 (1945) (same). ¶ 45 Finally, before the appellate court, the State additionally contended that its reference to defendant's use of a false identification in the information qualified as an exception to th | 1 | 2 |
People v. Lawrence Daygreen2 sentences2018People v. Morris, 135 Ill. 2d 540, 547-48 (1990); Strait, 72 Ill. 2d at 505-06 (finding that an indictment or information is fatally defective when it is filed after the statute of limitations has expired); People v. Day, 404 Ill. 268, 270 (1949) (same); People v. Taylor, 391 Ill. 11, 14 (1945) (same). ¶ 45 Finally, before the appellate court, the State additionally contended that its reference to defendant’s use of a false identification in the information qualified as an exception to the limitations period applicable when a criminal defendant “is not usually and publicly resident within this 2017People v. Morris , 135 Ill.2d 540 , 547-48, 143 Ill.Dec. 215 , 554 N.E.2d 150 (1990) ; Strait , 72 Ill.2d at 505 -06 , 21 Ill.Dec. 365 , 381 N.E.2d 692 (finding that an indictment or information is fatally defective when it is filed after the statute of limitations has expired); People v. Day , 404 Ill. 268 , 270, 88 N.E.2d 727 (1949) (same); People v. Taylor , 391 Ill. 11 , 14, 62 N.E.2d 683 (1945) (same). ¶ 45 Finally, before the appellate court, the State additionally contended that its reference to defendant's use of a false identification in the information qualified as an exception to th | 1 | 2 |
People v. Straitgreen2 sentences2018People v. Morris, 135 Ill. 2d 540, 547-48 (1990); Strait, 72 Ill. 2d at 505-06 (finding that an indictment or information is fatally defective when it is filed after the statute of limitations has expired); People v. Day, 404 Ill. 268, 270 (1949) (same); People v. Taylor, 391 Ill. 11, 14 (1945) (same). ¶ 45 Finally, before the appellate court, the State additionally contended that its reference to defendant’s use of a false identification in the information qualified as an exception to the limitations period applicable when a criminal defendant “is not usually and publicly resident within this 2017People v. Morris , 135 Ill.2d 540 , 547-48, 143 Ill.Dec. 215 , 554 N.E.2d 150 (1990) ; Strait , 72 Ill.2d at 505 -06 , 21 Ill.Dec. 365 , 381 N.E.2d 692 (finding that an indictment or information is fatally defective when it is filed after the statute of limitations has expired); People v. Day , 404 Ill. 268 , 270, 88 N.E.2d 727 (1949) (same); People v. Taylor , 391 Ill. 11 , 14, 62 N.E.2d 683 (1945) (same). ¶ 45 Finally, before the appellate court, the State additionally contended that its reference to defendant's use of a false identification in the information qualified as an exception to th | 1 | 2 |
People v. Morrisgreen2 sentences2018People v. Morris, 135 Ill. 2d 540, 547-48 (1990); Strait, 72 Ill. 2d at 505-06 (finding that an indictment or information is fatally defective when it is filed after the statute of limitations has expired); People v. Day, 404 Ill. 268, 270 (1949) (same); People v. Taylor, 391 Ill. 11, 14 (1945) (same). ¶ 45 Finally, before the appellate court, the State additionally contended that its reference to defendant’s use of a false identification in the information qualified as an exception to the limitations period applicable when a criminal defendant “is not usually and publicly resident within this 2017People v. Morris , 135 Ill.2d 540 , 547-48, 143 Ill.Dec. 215 , 554 N.E.2d 150 (1990) ; Strait , 72 Ill.2d at 505 -06 , 21 Ill.Dec. 365 , 381 N.E.2d 692 (finding that an indictment or information is fatally defective when it is filed after the statute of limitations has expired); People v. Day , 404 Ill. 268 , 270, 88 N.E.2d 727 (1949) (same); People v. Taylor , 391 Ill. 11 , 14, 62 N.E.2d 683 (1945) (same). ¶ 45 Finally, before the appellate court, the State additionally contended that its reference to defendant's use of a false identification in the information qualified as an exception to th | 1 | 2 |
People v. Thomasgreen2 sentences1966In People v. Scott, 55 Ill App2d 375, 378, 204 NE2d 586 the court held that the essentials of an admonishment have been complied with “if an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule,” citing People v. Doyle, 20 Ill2d 163, 167, 169, 169 NE2d 250 , and People v. Thomas, 55 Ill App2d 286, 204 NE2d 582 . 1965See also People v. Thomas, 55 Ill App2d 286, 204 NE2d 582 . | 1 | 2 |
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. SEC Donohue, Inc.green1 sentence2021Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. SEC Donahue, Inc., 176 Ill. 2d 160, 168-69 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2020Further, just as in Phillips, in this case, “defendant does not claim that he suffered any prejudice” from allegedly not being told “the names of the offenses with which he was charged, let alone the specifics of the allegations with regard to the locations and addresses of properties, and the alleged value of the properties.” See id., citing People v. Johnson, 119 Ill. 2d 119, 134 (1987) (substantial compliance found where the defendant suffered no prejudice). | 1 | 1 |
Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Centergreen1 sentence2000Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center , 117 Ill. 2d 507, 517 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Riversgreen1 sentence1992See, e.g., Rivers, 194 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. McCoygreen2 sentences1989App. 3d 1140 , 443 N.E. 2d 699 ; see also People v. McCoy (1979), 74 Ill. 2d 398 , 385 N.E. 2d 696 ); that Rule 402 requires only substantial and not literal compliance (People v. Krantz (1974), 58 Ill. 2d 187 , 317 N.E .2d 559); and that the judge’s remarks must be read in a practical and realistic manner to determine whether an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule. 1989App. 3d 1140 , 443 N.E. 2d 699 ; see also People v. McCoy (1979), 74 Ill. 2d 398 , 385 N.E. 2d 696 ); that Rule 402 requires only substantial and not literal compliance (People v. Krantz (1974), 58 Ill. 2d 187 , 317 N.E .2d 559); and that the judge’s remarks must be read in a practical and realistic manner to determine whether an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Washingtongreen2 sentences1984Accord, People v. Washington (1955), 5 Ill. 2d 58 , 124 N.E.2d 890 ; People v. Domico (1959), 15 Ill. 2d 590, 594-95 , 155 N.E.2d 591, 594 , cert. denied (1959), 360 U.S. 904 , 3 L. 1984Accord, People v. Washington (1955), 5 Ill. 2d 58 , 124 N.E.2d 890 ; People v. Domico (1959), 15 Ill. 2d 590, 594-95 , 155 N.E.2d 591, 594 , cert. denied (1959), 360 U.S. 904 , 3 L. | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Grattongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
The People v. Doyle
green
2 sentences1975The essentials have been complied with if an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule.’ (People v. Doyle, 20 Ill.2d 163, 167 ; see also People v. Caldwell, 55 Ill.2d 152, 156 .) We judge that a review of the record shows that the trial court satisfied the requirements of Rule 402 in informing the accused of and determining that he understood the nature of the charge against him.” (Emphasis added.) (People v. Krantz (1974), 58 Ill.2d 187, 192, 193 , 317 N.E.2d 559 .) In Krantz, the court had merely inquired of th 1975The essentials have been complied with if an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule.’ (People v. Doyle, 20 Ill.2d 163, 167 ; * * *.) # « * Rule 402 was designed to insure properly entered pleas of guilty, not to provide for merely an incantation or ceremonial.” 58 Ill. 2d 187, 193, 194-95 . | 9 | 1965–1975 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2026The defendant claimed that before and during his trial, the trial prosecutor, who was the first assistant state’s attorney in Vermilion County, was under investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Illinois State Police (ISP), and that the State suppressed this information from the defense, in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), thus depriving the defendant of his due-process right to a fair trial. 2023Relevant to this appeal, the amended petition alleged, inter alia: (1) that the petitioner was actually innocent of armed robbery based on newly discovered evidence, i.e., an affidavit from Paris Gosha, recanting his trial testimony regarding taking money from Leona’s; (2) that the State committed a violation pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) because it was aware of Gosha’s recantation prior to trial but failed to tender this information to the defense; and (3) that trial counsel was ineffective for rejecting the State’s plea offer on the petitioner’s behalf without first infor | 4 | 1984–2026 |
People v. Flathers
neutral
2 sentences2024“If an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule, the essentials have been complied with.” Id. 2023“If an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule, the essentials have been complied with.” Id. | 2 | 2023–2024 |
The PEOPLE v. Domico
green
2 sentences1984Accord, People v. Washington (1955), 5 Ill. 2d 58 , 124 N.E.2d 890 ; People v. Domico (1959), 15 Ill. 2d 590, 594-95 , 155 N.E.2d 591, 594 , cert. denied (1959), 360 U.S. 904 , 3 L. 1973You do understand that, do you not,” and the defendant replied “Yes.” In People v. Domico (1959), 15 Ill.2d 590 , at page 594, we stated: “all the requirements of the rule must be carefully complied with, but the remarks and advice of the court must be read in a practical and realistic manner. *** if an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule, the essentials have been complied with.” We find the admonition adequate to fully advise the defendant of the nature of the charge against him and the consequences thereo | 2 | 1973–1984 |
People v. Scott
neutral
2 sentences1968In People v. Scott, 55 Ill App2d 375, 204 NE2d 586 the court said at page 378: “The essentials of an admonishment have been complied with ‘if an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule.’ ” The rule laid down in Scott was fully complied with in the instant case. 1966In People v. Scott, 55 Ill App2d 375, 378, 204 NE2d 586 the court held that the essentials of an admonishment have been complied with “if an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule,” citing People v. Doyle, 20 Ill2d 163, 167, 169, 169 NE2d 250 , and People v. Thomas, 55 Ill App2d 286, 204 NE2d 582 . | 2 | 1966–1968 |
Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.
green
1 sentence2021App. 3d 90, 93 (2002). ¶ 32 An exception to the Moorman doctrine exists (“the information exception”), which allows for the recovery of economic loss in tort “where one who is in the business of supplying -10- No. 1-20-1156 information for the guidance of others in their business transactions makes negligent misrepresentations.” Moorman, 91 Ill. 2d at 88-89 . ¶ 33 The trial court here found that the Moorman doctrine bars Baja’s recovery under the negligent misrepresentation count because the cause of action is a tort and the damages related to that count are purely economic and the information | 1 | 2021–2021 |
People v. Hughes
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Allen
green
1 sentence1992We could look to the record of proceedings to determine whether defendant is adequately protected against double jeopardy (People v. Allen (1974), 56 Ill. 2d 536, 543 , 309 N.E.2d 544 , 548; People v. Maxwell (1992), 148 Ill. 2d 116, 138-39 ), but the State included only the common law record in the record on appeal. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Maxwell
green
1 sentence1992We could look to the record of proceedings to determine whether defendant is adequately protected against double jeopardy (People v. Allen (1974), 56 Ill. 2d 536, 543 , 309 N.E.2d 544 , 548; People v. Maxwell (1992), 148 Ill. 2d 116, 138-39 ), but the State included only the common law record in the record on appeal. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Taylor
neutral
2 sentences1989App. 3d 1140 , 443 N.E. 2d 699 ; see also People v. McCoy (1979), 74 Ill. 2d 398 , 385 N.E. 2d 696 ); that Rule 402 requires only substantial and not literal compliance (People v. Krantz (1974), 58 Ill. 2d 187 , 317 N.E .2d 559); and that the judge’s remarks must be read in a practical and realistic manner to determine whether an ordinary person in the circumstances of the accused would understand them as conveying the information required by the rule. 1989(Taylor, 110 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Sutherland
green
1 sentence1988People v. Sutherland (1984), 128 Ill. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
United States v. Bagley
green
2 sentences1987As the United States Supreme Court held in United States v. Bagley (1985), 473 U.S. 667 , 87 L. 1987As the United States Supreme Court held in United States v. Bagley (1985), 473 U.S. 667 , 87 L. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Allen v. Smyth
neutral
1 sentence1984Accord, People v. Washington (1955), 5 Ill. 2d 58 , 124 N.E.2d 890 ; People v. Domico (1959), 15 Ill. 2d 590, 594-95 , 155 N.E.2d 591, 594 , cert. denied (1959), 360 U.S. 904 , 3 L. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Smith v. Alvis
green
1 sentence1984Accord, People v. Washington (1955), 5 Ill. 2d 58 , 124 N.E.2d 890 ; People v. Domico (1959), 15 Ill. 2d 590, 594-95 , 155 N.E.2d 591, 594 , cert. denied (1959), 360 U.S. 904 , 3 L. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
People v. Leach
green
1 sentence1984We distinguish People v. Leach (1972), 3 Ill. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| People v. Dukett green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| People v. Gaines neutral | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| Williams v. Florida green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| People v. Zimmerman green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| People v. Gray neutral | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| People v. Diaz green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| People v. Williams neutral | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| People v. Chatman neutral | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| People v. Dudley green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| The PEOPLE v. Johnson green | 1 | 1969–1969 |
| People v. Martin neutral | 1 | 1925–1925 |
| People ex rel. Cullen v. Anderson neutral | 1 | 1915–1915 |
| Winkelman v. People neutral | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.