Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Edwards v. Stategreen1 sentence2023See Edwards v. State, 453 Md. 174 , 199 n.15 (2017) (where there was no evidence that the perpetrator came into contact with the tested items, the absence of a defendant’s DNA “would not tend to establish that he was not the perpetrator of th[e] crime”). 5 harm the victim.”7 The State alleged that this information was not in defense counsel’s trial file, and it was not included in any of the State’s discovery disclosures. | 1 | 1 |
Wiggins v. Smith, Wardengreen2 sentences2007See Wiggins, 539 U.S. at 528 , 123 S.Ct. at 2539 (stating that "[a]s we established in Strickland , `strategic choices made after less than complete investigation are reasonable precisely to the extent that reasonable professional judgments support the limitations on investigation.'" (internal citations omitted)). 2007See Wiggins, 539 U.S. at 528 , 123 S.Ct. at 2539 (stating that "[a]s we established in Strickland , `strategic choices made after less than complete investigation are reasonable precisely to the extent that reasonable professional judgments support the limitations on investigation.'" (internal citations omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
West v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See West v. State, 137 Md.App. 314, 327-28 , 768 A.2d 150 , cert. denied, 364 Md. 536 , 774 A.2d 409 (2001). 2004See West v. State, 137 Md.App. 314, 327-28 , 768 A.2d 150 , cert. denied, 364 Md. 536 , 774 A.2d 409 (2001). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 503768green1 sentence2001As stated in United States v. Schlette, 842 F.2d 1574, 1581 (9th Cir.1988), "if the reasons for maintaining [confidentiality] do not apply at all in a given case, or apply only to an insignificant degree, the party seeking disclosure should not be required to demonstrate a large compelling need.” (alterations in original). | 1 | 1 |
Brogan v. Passaic Daily Newsgreen1 sentence1972See Brogan v. Passaic Daily News, 123 A. 2d 473 (N.J.) ; State v. Donovan, supra. The statute, on its face, does not purport to protect a newsman from disclosing only such sources of news or information published by him that was received in the course of a confidential newsman-informant relationship. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Reese v. State
green
1 sentence2026Id. at 290 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence2021Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Goldsmith v. State
green
2 sentences2014Similarly, because at that point the trial judge knows that the case is actually going to trial, “the trial judge will be in a better position to determine what the contested issues are and evaluate the relevancy of the information the defense is seeking.” Goldsmith, 337 Md. at 131-32 , 651 A.2d at 876 . 2014Similarly, because at that point the trial judge knows that the case is actually going to trial, “the trial judge will be in a better position to determine what the contested issues are and evaluate the relevancy of the information the defense is seeking.” Goldsmith, 337 Md. at 131-32 , 651 A.2d at 876 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
United States v. Jesse James Risha
green
1 sentence2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Willie Lee Knight v. United States
green
1 sentence1984If failure to file such an information was error we regard it as harmless.” 225 F.2d at 57 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Donovan
green
1 sentence1972See Brogan v. Passaic Daily News, 123 A. 2d 473 (N.J.) ; State v. Donovan, supra. The statute, on its face, does not purport to protect a newsman from disclosing only such sources of news or information published by him that was received in the course of a confidential newsman-informant relationship. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Stearns v. State
neutral
1 sentence1905But in Stearns v. The State, 81 Md. 341 , decided in 1895, an information for violation of the gambling act was held bad for du plicity, and we therefore hold this demurrer should- have been sustained. ■ ' ' ' . ■ - *626 The questions sought to be. raised by this plea, however, are important in themselves, and as affecting the- administration-of the criminal law in Prince George’s County, and we will therefore proceed to state our views in respect to them. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.