Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Faretta v. Californiagreen2 sentences2016In Faretta , the Supreme Court recognized that “[w]hen an accused manages his own defense, he relinquishes ... many of the traditional benefits associated with the right to counsel.” 422 U.S. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 . 2016In Faretta , the Supreme Court recognized that “[w]hen an accused manages his own defense, he relinquishes ... many of the traditional benefits associated with the right to counsel.” 422 U.S. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 . | 1 | 12 |
Indiana v. Edwardsgreen1 sentence2008For this reason, in order to represent himself, the accused must ‘knowingly and intelligently’ forego those relinquished benefits.” Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835 (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464-65 (1938)); see Edwards, 128 S. Ct. at 2383 . | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Zerbstgreen1 sentence2008For this reason, in order to represent himself, the accused must ‘knowingly and intelligently’ forego those relinquished benefits.” Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835 (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464-65 (1938)); see Edwards, 128 S. Ct. at 2383 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann
green
2 sentences1979McCann, 317 U.S. 269 , 63 S.Ct. 236 , 87 L.Ed.2d 268 (1943), that the Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel implicitly embodies a ‘correlative right to dispense with a lawyer’s help.’ “In Faretta the Court wrote: “ ‘When an accused manages his own defense, he relinquishes, as a purely factual matter, many of the traditional benefits associated with the right to counsel. 1979McCann, 317 U.S. 269 , 63 S.Ct. 236 , 87 L.Ed.2d 268 (1943), that the Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel implicitly embodies a ‘correlative right to dispense with a lawyer’s help.’ “In Faretta the Court wrote: “ ‘When an accused manages his own defense, he relinquishes, as a purely factual matter, many of the traditional benefits associated with the right to counsel. | 2 | 1977–1979 |
Godinez v. Moran
green
2 sentences2013These rights must be waived “(1) competently, [2] (2) knowingly and intelligently, and (3) voluntarily.” Collier, 959 S.W.2d at 625 (citing Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 400-01 , 113 S.Ct. 2680 , 125 L.Ed.2d 321 (1993); Faretta, 422 U.S. at 834-36 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 ). 2013These rights must be waived “(1) competently, [2] (2) knowingly and intelligently, and (3) voluntarily.” Collier, 959 S.W.2d at 625 (citing Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 400-01 , 113 S.Ct. 2680 , 125 L.Ed.2d 321 (1993); Faretta, 422 U.S. at 834-36 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Collier v. State
green
1 sentence2013These rights must be waived “(1) competently, [2] (2) knowingly and intelligently, and (3) voluntarily.” Collier, 959 S.W.2d at 625 (citing Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 400-01 , 113 S.Ct. 2680 , 125 L.Ed.2d 321 (1993); Faretta, 422 U.S. at 834-36 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Oliver v. State
green
1 sentence1999For this reason, in order to represent himself, the accused must “knowingly and intelligently” forgo those relinquished benefits. 3 In Oliver v. State, 872 S.W.2d 713 (Tex.Crim.App.1994) the Court of Criminal Appeals said, [I]t is essential that no criminal defendant be subjected to formal adversarial judicial proceedings without a lawyer unless there is a basis for concluding that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently relinquished or abandoned his right to the assistance of counsel. 4 A waiver of the right to counsel will not be “lightly inferred,” and the courts will indulge every rea | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.