15 Texas opinions name it 5 courts 1961–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
James Edward Ehl v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Correctionsgreen2 sentences2003The Ehl v. Estelle case suggests that a change of plea bargaining position following the conviction and after the defendant exercised a constitutional right to challenge that conviction gives a presumption of prosecutorial vindictiveness. 656 F.2d 166, 169 (5th Cir. 1981). 2003The Ehl v. Estelle case suggests that a change of plea bargaining position following the conviction and after the defendant exercised a constitutional right to challenge that conviction gives a presumption of prosecutorial vindictiveness. 656 F.2d 166, 169 (5th Cir.1981). | 2 | 2 |
Hardie v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Hardie, 807 S.W.2d at 322 ; Dumas, 812 S.W.2d at 614 . 2000See Hardie, 807 S.W.2d at 322 ; Dumas, 812 S.W.2d at 614 . | 2 | 2 |
Guzman v. Stategreen1 sentence2026Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85, 87 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusettsgreen1 sentence2015Meledez, supra at 328-329. | 1 | 1 |
Lantrip v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Randle v. State, 826 S.W.2d 943, 944 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992); Lantrip v. State, 336 S.W.3d 343, 351 (Tex.App.--Texarkana 2011, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Randle v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Randle v. State, 826 S.W.2d 943, 944 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992); Lantrip v. State, 336 S.W.3d 343, 351 (Tex.App.--Texarkana 2011, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Cleveland Brown v. Michael J. Crowleygreen1 sentence2012See Brown v. Crowley, 312 F.3d 782, 791 (6th Cir. 2002) (“Prison officials are clearly free to punish inmate conduct that threatens the orderly administration of the prison. | 1 | 1 |
Solomon v. Stategreen1 sentence2011A. Preservation of Error 63 See Art. 37.071, §2(a); Solomon v. State, 49 S.W.3d 356, 364-65 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Rezac v. Stategreen1 sentence1991See, e.g., Hardie, 807 S.W.2d at 322 ; Miffleton v. State, 728 S.W.2d 880, 884 (Tex.App. — Austin 1987), aff'd, 777 S.W.2d 76 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Rezac v. State, 722 S.W.2d 32, 33 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1986), rev’d on other grounds, 782 S.W.2d 869 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Miffleton v. Stategreen1 sentence1991See, e.g., Hardie, 807 S.W.2d at 322 ; Miffleton v. State, 728 S.W.2d 880, 884 (Tex.App. — Austin 1987), aff'd, 777 S.W.2d 76 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Rezac v. State, 722 S.W.2d 32, 33 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1986), rev’d on other grounds, 782 S.W.2d 869 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Rothgreen1 sentence1987Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 577 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morgan v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2021Morgan held that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to challenge for cause any prospective juror who would automatically vote for the death penalty, Morgan, 504 U.S. at 729 , and a concomitant right to questioning adequate to discover such jurors, id. at 733–34. 2021Morgan held that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to challenge for cause any prospective juror who would automatically vote for the death penalty, Morgan, 504 U.S. at 729 , and a concomitant right to questioning adequate to discover such jurors, id. at 733–34. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Kalisz v. State
green
1 sentence2015Appellant argues .that the “probable collateral implication” of the error “is that the jury may have adversely or improperly considered evidence of an accused invoking a constitutional right or privilege as an inference of guilt.” See id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Dumas v. State
green
2 sentences2000See Hardie, 807 S.W.2d at 322 ; Dumas, 812 S.W.2d at 614 . 2000See Hardie, 807 S.W.2d at 322 ; Dumas, 812 S.W.2d at 614 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences2000Id. at 23-24 , 87 S.Ct. at 827-28 , 17 L.Ed.2d at 705 . 2000Id. at 23-24 , 87 S.Ct. at 827-28 , 17 L.Ed.2d at 705 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Rezac v. State
green
1 sentence1991See, e.g., Hardie, 807 S.W.2d at 322 ; Miffleton v. State, 728 S.W.2d 880, 884 (Tex.App. — Austin 1987), aff'd, 777 S.W.2d 76 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Rezac v. State, 722 S.W.2d 32, 33 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1986), rev’d on other grounds, 782 S.W.2d 869 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Miffleton v. State
green
1 sentence1991See, e.g., Hardie, 807 S.W.2d at 322 ; Miffleton v. State, 728 S.W.2d 880, 884 (Tex.App. — Austin 1987), aff'd, 777 S.W.2d 76 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Rezac v. State, 722 S.W.2d 32, 33 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1986), rev’d on other grounds, 782 S.W.2d 869 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Stanley v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1981In Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972), the United States Supreme Court held that a father had a constitutional right to a hearing before the State could take his children from him. 1981In Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972), the United States Supreme Court held that a father had a constitutional right to a hearing before the State could take his children from him. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Bragg v. Weaver
green
2 sentences1961When there is a constitutional right to a hearing, as was held in Bragg v. Weaver, supra, one constitutional method of fixing damages ‘among sev *557 eral admissible modes is that of causing the amount to be assessed by viewers subject to an appeal to a court carrying with it a right to have the matter determined upon a full trial.’ This is the rule adopted in numerous other cases.” Bragg v. Weaver, 1919, 251 U.S. 57 , 40 Sup. Ct. 62, 64 L. 1961When there is a constitutional right to a hearing, as was held in Bragg v. Weaver, supra, one constitutional method of fixing damages ‘among sev *557 eral admissible modes is that of causing the amount to be assessed by viewers subject to an appeal to a court carrying with it a right to have the matter determined upon a full trial.’ This is the rule adopted in numerous other cases.” Bragg v. Weaver, 1919, 251 U.S. 57 , 40 Sup. Ct. 62, 64 L. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.