Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Van Riper v. Threadgillgreen2 sentences2015Indeed, the courts of this state “have long recognized the strong public policy favoring the initiative and referendum.” Van Riper v. Threadgill, 183 Ariz. 580, 582 , 905 P.2d 589, 591 (App.1995), citing *78 W. 2015Indeed, the courts of this state “have long recognized the strong public policy favoring the initiative and referendum.” Van Riper v. Threadgill, 183 Ariz. 580, 582 , 905 P.2d 589, 591 (App.1995), citing *78 W. | 2 | 2 |
Sklar v. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLSgreen2 sentences2015This court recognizes the importance of and “respect[e] the citizens’ constitutional right to challenge a government’s legislative actions by referring a duly enacted measure to the ballot for a vote.” Sklar v. Town of Fountain Hills, 220 Ariz. 449, ¶ 8 , 207 P.3d 702, 705 (App.2008). 2015This court recognizes the importance of and “respect[e] the citizens’ constitutional right to challenge a government’s legislative actions by referring a duly enacted measure to the ballot for a vote.” Sklar v. Town of Fountain Hills, 220 Ariz. 449, ¶ 8 , 207 P.3d 702, 705 (App.2008). | 2 | 2 |
Lawrence v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2008Ariz. Const. art. 4, pt. 1, § 1; Lawrence v. Jones, 199 Ariz. 446, 449, ¶ 7 , 18 P.3d 1245, 1248 (App.2001) (stating that “[o]ur courts have also consistently recognized ‘Arizona’s strong public policy favoring the initiative and referendum.’ ”) (citing Western Devcor, Inc., 168 Ariz. at 428, 814 P.2d at 769 ). 2008Ariz. Const. art. 4, pt. 1, § 1; Lawrence v. Jones, 199 Ariz. 446, 449, ¶ 7 , 18 P.3d 1245, 1248 (App.2001) (stating that “[o]ur courts have also consistently recognized ‘Arizona’s strong public policy favoring the initiative and referendum.’ ”) (citing Western Devcor, Inc., 168 Ariz. at 428, 814 P.2d at 769 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale
green
1 sentence2008Ariz. Const. art. 4, pt. 1, § 1; Lawrence v. Jones, 199 Ariz. 446, 449, ¶ 7 , 18 P.3d 1245, 1248 (App.2001) (stating that “[o]ur courts have also consistently recognized ‘Arizona’s strong public policy favoring the initiative and referendum.’ ”) (citing Western Devcor, Inc., 168 Ariz. at 428, 814 P.2d at 769 ). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Alvarado
green
1 sentence1979The United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 , 84 S.Ct. 1774 , 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964), and Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2497 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), has established that a defendant has a constitutional right to a hearing on the issue of voluntariness upon objecting to the use of his confessions. 1 See State v. Alvarado, 121 Ariz. 485 , 591 P.2d *581 973 (1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Jackson v. Denno
green
2 sentences1979The United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 , 84 S.Ct. 1774 , 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964), and Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2497 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), has established that a defendant has a constitutional right to a hearing on the issue of voluntariness upon objecting to the use of his confessions. 1 See State v. Alvarado, 121 Ariz. 485 , 591 P.2d *581 973 (1979). 1979The United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 , 84 S.Ct. 1774 , 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964), and Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2497 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), has established that a defendant has a constitutional right to a hearing on the issue of voluntariness upon objecting to the use of his confessions. 1 See State v. Alvarado, 121 Ariz. 485 , 591 P.2d *581 973 (1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Wainwright v. Sykes
green
2 sentences1979The United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 , 84 S.Ct. 1774 , 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964), and Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2497 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), has established that a defendant has a constitutional right to a hearing on the issue of voluntariness upon objecting to the use of his confessions. 1 See State v. Alvarado, 121 Ariz. 485 , 591 P.2d *581 973 (1979). 1979The United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 , 84 S.Ct. 1774 , 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964), and Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2497 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), has established that a defendant has a constitutional right to a hearing on the issue of voluntariness upon objecting to the use of his confessions. 1 See State v. Alvarado, 121 Ariz. 485 , 591 P.2d *581 973 (1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
green
2 sentences1976STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice (dissenting) : The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S. Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), makes it perfectly clear that Smith did not have a constitutional right to a hearing before The Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System Council in connection with the decision to terminate his employment with the Pima County Sheriff’s Office. 1976STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice (dissenting) : The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S. Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), makes it perfectly clear that Smith did not have a constitutional right to a hearing before The Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System Council in connection with the decision to terminate his employment with the Pima County Sheriff’s Office. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Bennett v. Arizona State Board of Public Welfare
green
2 sentences1969McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 92 Ariz. 317 , 376 P.2d 779 (1962); Schecter v. Killingsworth, 93 Ariz. 273 , 380 P.2d 136 (1963); Bennett v. Arizona State Board of Welfare, 95 Ariz. 170 , 388 P.2d 166 (1963); Londoner v. City and County of Denver, 210 U.S. 373 , 28 S.Ct. 708 , 52 L.Ed. 1103 (1908). 1969McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 92 Ariz. 317 , 376 P.2d 779 (1962); Schecter v. Killingsworth, 93 Ariz. 273 , 380 P.2d 136 (1963); Bennett v. Arizona State Board of Welfare, 95 Ariz. 170 , 388 P.2d 166 (1963); Londoner v. City and County of Denver, 210 U.S. 373 , 28 S.Ct. 708 , 52 L.Ed. 1103 (1908). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Schecter v. Killingsworth
green
2 sentences1969McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 92 Ariz. 317 , 376 P.2d 779 (1962); Schecter v. Killingsworth, 93 Ariz. 273 , 380 P.2d 136 (1963); Bennett v. Arizona State Board of Welfare, 95 Ariz. 170 , 388 P.2d 166 (1963); Londoner v. City and County of Denver, 210 U.S. 373 , 28 S.Ct. 708 , 52 L.Ed. 1103 (1908). 1969McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 92 Ariz. 317 , 376 P.2d 779 (1962); Schecter v. Killingsworth, 93 Ariz. 273 , 380 P.2d 136 (1963); Bennett v. Arizona State Board of Welfare, 95 Ariz. 170 , 388 P.2d 166 (1963); Londoner v. City and County of Denver, 210 U.S. 373 , 28 S.Ct. 708 , 52 L.Ed. 1103 (1908). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles
green
2 sentences1969McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 92 Ariz. 317 , 376 P.2d 779 (1962); Schecter v. Killingsworth, 93 Ariz. 273 , 380 P.2d 136 (1963); Bennett v. Arizona State Board of Welfare, 95 Ariz. 170 , 388 P.2d 166 (1963); Londoner v. City and County of Denver, 210 U.S. 373 , 28 S.Ct. 708 , 52 L.Ed. 1103 (1908). 1969McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 92 Ariz. 317 , 376 P.2d 779 (1962); Schecter v. Killingsworth, 93 Ariz. 273 , 380 P.2d 136 (1963); Bennett v. Arizona State Board of Welfare, 95 Ariz. 170 , 388 P.2d 166 (1963); Londoner v. City and County of Denver, 210 U.S. 373 , 28 S.Ct. 708 , 52 L.Ed. 1103 (1908). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Londoner v. City and County of Denver
green
2 sentences1969McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 92 Ariz. 317 , 376 P.2d 779 (1962); Schecter v. Killingsworth, 93 Ariz. 273 , 380 P.2d 136 (1963); Bennett v. Arizona State Board of Welfare, 95 Ariz. 170 , 388 P.2d 166 (1963); Londoner v. City and County of Denver, 210 U.S. 373 , 28 S.Ct. 708 , 52 L.Ed. 1103 (1908). 1969McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 92 Ariz. 317 , 376 P.2d 779 (1962); Schecter v. Killingsworth, 93 Ariz. 273 , 380 P.2d 136 (1963); Bennett v. Arizona State Board of Welfare, 95 Ariz. 170 , 388 P.2d 166 (1963); Londoner v. City and County of Denver, 210 U.S. 373 , 28 S.Ct. 708 , 52 L.Ed. 1103 (1908). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
In Re Burson
green
2 sentences1968In the case of In re Burson, 152 Ohio St. 375 , 89 N.E.2d 651 , it was held that a plea of guilty to an indictment raises a presumption of waiver to a constitutional right and such waiver may -be either express or implied. 1968In the case of In re Burson, 152 Ohio St. 375 , 89 N.E.2d 651 , it was held that a plea of guilty to an indictment raises a presumption of waiver to a constitutional right and such waiver may -be either express or implied. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.