Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1956–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re City of Dallasgreen2 sentences2018In re City of Dallas, 445 S.W.3d 456, 462 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2014, orig. proceeding); see also In re Jackson, No. 07-15-00429-CV, 2015 WL 8781272 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Dec. 11, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op. per curiam). 2015In re City of Dallas, 445 S.W.3d 456, 462 (Tex.App.—Dallas 2014, orig. proceeding). | 3 | 3 |
Druery v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Druery v. State , 225 S.W.3d 491, 504 ( Tex.Crim.App . 2007). 2010See Druery v. State, 225 S.W.3d 491, 504 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). | 2 | 2 |
Texas Commerce Bank Reagan Ex Rel. Texas Commerce Bank National Ass'n v. Lebco Constructors, Inc.green1 sentence2018However, “any error in the trial court’s allocation of peremptory challenges must be preserved by a timely, specific objection.” Pojar v. Cifre, 199 S.W.3d 317 , 336–37 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006, pet. denied) (citing Tex. Commerce Bank Reagan v. Lebco Constructors, 865 S.W.2d 68, 78 (Tex. App.— Corpus Christi 1993, writ denied)). | 1 | 1 |
Willis v. Stategreen1 sentence2016An incurably prejudicial argument requires a mistrial.23 If the trial court does not grant the mistrial, the court has committed error that requires setting aside the conviction and re-trying the case.24 Respectfully, if the argument is so prejudicial that it has deprived the 21 See Willis v. State, 785 S.W.2d 378, 385 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Cockrell v. Stategreen1 sentence2016App. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 908 (1990), overruled by Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Reecegreen1 sentence2014As the supreme court has noted, “[a]ppellate courts cannot afford to grant interlocutory review of every claim that a trial court has made a pre-trial mistake.”9 5 See In re Reece, 341 S.W.3d 360, 374 (Tex. 2011) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Long v. Stategreen1 sentence2010Id . (citing Long v. State , 800 S.W.2d 545, 548 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Narvaiz v. Stategreen1 sentence2004Id. (citing Narvaiz v. State , 840 S.W.2d 415, 429 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Lopez v. Foremost Paving, Inc.green1 sentence2000Lopez v. Foremost Paving, Inc., 709 S.W.2d 643, 644 (Tex.1986). | 1 | 1 |
Warnasch v. Wagnergreen1 sentence1956See Alice Warnasch v. Wagner, Tex.Civ.App., 291 S.W.2d 389 , and authorities cited. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pojar v. Cifre Ex Rel. Cifre
green
1 sentence2018However, “any error in the trial court’s allocation of peremptory challenges must be preserved by a timely, specific objection.” Pojar v. Cifre, 199 S.W.3d 317 , 336–37 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006, pet. denied) (citing Tex. Commerce Bank Reagan v. Lebco Constructors, 865 S.W.2d 68, 78 (Tex. App.— Corpus Christi 1993, writ denied)). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Hallett v. Houston Northwest Medical Center
green
1 sentence2018Ctr., 689 S.W.2d 888 , 889–90 (Tex. 1985). 18 And, the amount that the jury awarded solely for repairs, $12,000, also exceeds $8,800. 19 State Farm argues by a sub-issue that the allegedly improper strikes for cause granted to the Vegas resulted in the trial court granting an uneven amount of peremptory strikes with the Vegas getting seven additional peremptory strikes than State Farm and that the “traditional ‘harmless error’ rule has been relaxed when the trial court has committed error in awarding [peremptory] strikes.” (Internal quotations omitted). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Hamilton, as Natural Mother and Next Friend to Smith v. Texas
green
1 sentence2016App. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 908 (1990), overruled by Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Foster v. State
green
1 sentence2004Id. (citing Narvaiz v. State , 840 S.W.2d 415, 429 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Zanders v. State
green
2 sentences1994Zanders, 480 S.W.2d at 710 . 1994Zanders, 480 S.W.2d at 710 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Patterson Dental Co. v. Dunn
green
1 sentence1986In Patterson Dental Co. v. Dunn, 592 S.W.2d 914 (Tex.1980), we recognized that a complaining party who has been wronged by an error in awarding of peremptory strikes theoretically has an overwhelming burden. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.