Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1914–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Palmer v. Enserch Corp.green2 sentences2018Palmer v. Ensearch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.); see Gonzalez v. City of Harlingen, 814 S.W.2d 109, 112 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied). 2001See Medrano v. City of Pearsall, 989 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ager, 977 S.W.2d at 660 ; see also Casso v. Brand, 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex.1989) (burden does not shift to non-movant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law); Palmer v. Enserch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“If a movant establishes an affirmative defense ..., the non-moving party must then adduce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the affirmative defense, for example, facts which would bring the matter within an exception or de | 7 | 9 |
Gonzalez v. City of Harlingengreen2 sentences2018Palmer v. Ensearch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e.); see Gonzalez v. City of Harlingen, 814 S.W.2d 109, 112 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied). 2014See Gonzalez v. City of Harlingen, 814 S.W.2d 109 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied); Palmer v. Ensearch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, writ ref’d n.r.e). | 3 | 3 |
" MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum Companygreen2 sentences1997See Ryland Group, 924 S.W.2d at 121 ; “Moore” Burger, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 492 S.W.2d 934, 936-37 (Tex.1972); Delcourt v. Silverman, 919 S.W.2d 777, 783 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, writ denied). 1987See, “Moore” Burger, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 492 S.W.2d 934 (Tex.1972); Cobb v. West Texas *436 Microwave Co., 700 S.W.2d 615 (Tex.App.1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.). | 2 | 2 |
Casso v. Brandgreen1 sentence2001See Medrano v. City of Pearsall, 989 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ager, 977 S.W.2d at 660 ; see also Casso v. Brand, 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex.1989) (burden does not shift to non-movant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law); Palmer v. Enserch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“If a movant establishes an affirmative defense ..., the non-moving party must then adduce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the affirmative defense, for example, facts which would bring the matter within an exception or de | 1 | 1 |
Medrano v. City of Pearsallgreen1 sentence2001See Medrano v. City of Pearsall, 989 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ager, 977 S.W.2d at 660 ; see also Casso v. Brand, 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex.1989) (burden does not shift to non-movant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law); Palmer v. Enserch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“If a movant establishes an affirmative defense ..., the non-moving party must then adduce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the affirmative defense, for example, facts which would bring the matter within an exception or de | 1 | 1 |
Ryland Group, Inc. v. Hoodgreen1 sentence1997See Ryland Group, 924 S.W.2d at 121 ; “Moore” Burger, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 492 S.W.2d 934, 936-37 (Tex.1972); Delcourt v. Silverman, 919 S.W.2d 777, 783 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, writ denied). | 1 | 1 |
Delcourt v. Silvermangreen1 sentence1997See Ryland Group, 924 S.W.2d at 121 ; “Moore” Burger, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 492 S.W.2d 934, 936-37 (Tex.1972); Delcourt v. Silverman, 919 S.W.2d 777, 783 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, writ denied). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ager v. Wichita General Hospital
green
1 sentence2001See Medrano v. City of Pearsall, 989 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ager, 977 S.W.2d at 660 ; see also Casso v. Brand, 776 S.W.2d 551, 556 (Tex.1989) (burden does not shift to non-movant unless movant establishes defense as matter of law); Palmer v. Enserch Corp., 728 S.W.2d 431, 435 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“If a movant establishes an affirmative defense ..., the non-moving party must then adduce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the affirmative defense, for example, facts which would bring the matter within an exception or de | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Cobb v. West Texas Microwave Co.
green
1 sentence1987See, “Moore” Burger, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 492 S.W.2d 934 (Tex.1972); Cobb v. West Texas *436 Microwave Co., 700 S.W.2d 615 (Tex.App.1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Burris v. Levy
green
1 sentence1975It was held in Burris v. Levy, 302 S.W.2d 171 (Tex.Civ.App.1957, writ ref. n. r. e.), that if a party calls upon his adversary to make admissions under Rule 169, which admissions relate to statements by or transactions with the deceased, otherwise barred by the provisions of Art. 3716, he has called such adverse party to testify concerning such transactions or statements and cannot thereafter object to further testimony by such party under the bar set forth in the Dead Man’s Statute; developing a matter within the bar of the statute by deposition serves to waive the bar and obtaining of such m | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Bain v. Coats
neutral
1 sentence1929App.) 228 S. W. 571 ; Rea v. Johnson (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Gallagher v. State
neutral
2 sentences1914Rep., 50 , 115 S. W. 1914Appellant also contends that we should consider the bill in regard to the change of venue, claiming that such bill presents the matter within the rule announced in the eases of Gallagher v. State, 55 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.