Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blacklock v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Blacklock v. State, 820 S.W.2d 882, 884-85 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, pet. ref'd) (demonstrating that extraneous sexual offenses were relevant in a sexual assault case in the pretrial competency hearing to prove a pattern of behavior on which the expert relied for his testimony). b. 2006Blacklock v. State, 820 S.W.2d 882, 884-85 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, pet. ref'd) (demonstrating that extraneous sexual offenses were relevant in a sexual assault case in the pretrial competency hearing to prove a pattern of behavior on which the expert relied for his testimony). b. | 2 | 2 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2009At a pretrial competency hearing, a psychiatrist testified that the killing of Jackson’s sister had been so "abnormal” to Jackson that he "could not understand it, and thus could not remember it.” Id. at 690 . . 391 F.2d 460 (D.C.Cir.1968). . 2009At a pretrial competency hearing, a psychiatrist testified that the killing of Jackson's sister had been so "abnormal" to Jackson that he "could not understand it, and thus could not remember it." Id. at 690 . 20. 391 F.2d 460 (D.C. | 1 | 7 |
Streaker v. Stategreen1 sentence1998See Rodriquez v. State, 816 S.W.2d 493, 495 (Tex.App.—Waco 1991, pet. ref'd) (holding that the court did not abuse its discretion in failing to conduct a pretrial competency hearing when all the mental health experts who examined him opined that appellant was competent to stand trial); see also Streaker v. State, 487 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tex.Crim.App.1972) (holding that the court did not err in refusing to conduct a pretrial hearing to determine sanity when the psychiatric evaluations received indicated that appellant was sane). | 1 | 1 |
Rodriquez v. Stategreen1 sentence1998See Rodriquez v. State, 816 S.W.2d 493, 495 (Tex.App.—Waco 1991, pet. ref'd) (holding that the court did not abuse its discretion in failing to conduct a pretrial competency hearing when all the mental health experts who examined him opined that appellant was competent to stand trial); see also Streaker v. State, 487 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tex.Crim.App.1972) (holding that the court did not err in refusing to conduct a pretrial hearing to determine sanity when the psychiatric evaluations received indicated that appellant was sane). | 1 | 1 |
Ramsey v. Stategreen1 sentence1981See Ramsey v. State, 563 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Robert Wilson v. United States
green
2 sentences2009At a pretrial competency hearing, a psychiatrist testified that the killing of Jackson’s sister had been so "abnormal” to Jackson that he "could not understand it, and thus could not remember it.” Id. at 690 . . 391 F.2d 460 (D.C.Cir.1968). . 2009At a pretrial competency hearing, a psychiatrist testified that the killing of Jackson's sister had been so "abnormal" to Jackson that he "could not understand it, and thus could not remember it." Id. at 690 . 20. 391 F.2d 460 (D.C. | 3 | 2009–2009 |
Thomas v. State
green
2 sentences1981Morales v. State, 587 S.W.2d 418 (Tex.Cr.App.); Thomas v. State, 562 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.Cr.App.). 1979Perryman v. State, 507 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.Cr.App.); Paul v. State, 544 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.Cr.App.); and Thomas v. State, 562 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.Cr.App.). | 2 | 1979–1981 |
Hackbarth v. State
green
1 sentence2015Hackbarth v. State, 617 S.W.2d 944 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Estelle v. Smith
green
2 sentences1997Finally, in point of error number four, appellant, citing Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 1866 , 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981), argues that his Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination was violated when Dr. Decena testified at the pretrial competency hearing. 1997Finally, in point of error number four, appellant, citing Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 1866 , 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981), argues that his Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination was violated when Dr. Decena testified at the pretrial competency hearing. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Morales v. State
green
1 sentence1981Morales v. State, 587 S.W.2d 418 (Tex.Cr.App.); Thomas v. State, 562 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.Cr.App.). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Perryman v. State
green
1 sentence1979Perryman v. State, 507 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.Cr.App.); Paul v. State, 544 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.Cr.App.); and Thomas v. State, 562 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.Cr.App.). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Paul v. State
green
1 sentence1979Perryman v. State, 507 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.Cr.App.); Paul v. State, 544 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.Cr.App.); and Thomas v. State, 562 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.Cr.App.). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.