Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
in Re Robert O. Craiggreen1 sentence2019See Craig, 426 S.W.3d at 107 . | 1 | 1 |
Lopez v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See Lopez, 343 S.W.3d at 143 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re Davidsongreen1 sentence2015See In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d at 662 ; In re Davidson, 153 S.W.3d 490, 491 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2004, orig. proceeding); In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d at 228 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re Blakeneygreen1 sentence2015See In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d at 662 ; In re Davidson, 153 S.W.3d 490, 491 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2004, orig. proceeding); In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d at 228 . | 1 | 1 |
Edwards v. Stategreen1 sentence2001"It is appellant's burden to establish a record supporting his claim that his right to a speedy trial was denied and that he asserted that right before the trial court." Edwards v. State , 867 S.W.2d 90, 95 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1993, no pet.) (emphasis added) (citing Vanderbilt v. State , 629 S.W.2d 709, 717 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Vanderbilt v. Stategreen1 sentence2001"It is appellant's burden to establish a record supporting his claim that his right to a speedy trial was denied and that he asserted that right before the trial court." Edwards v. State , 867 S.W.2d 90, 95 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1993, no pet.) (emphasis added) (citing Vanderbilt v. State , 629 S.W.2d 709, 717 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
McCaskill v. McCaskillgreen1 sentence1994See McCaskill v. McCaskill, 761 S.W.2d 470, 473 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied) (upholding an agreed judgment when the record did not reflect that consent was withdrawn prior to the signing of the judgment). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Walker v. Packer
green
2 sentences2012Id. 2011Id. | 4 | 2011–2012 |
Torres v. State
green
2 sentences1995Torres, 804 S.W.2d at 919 . 1995Torres, 804 S.W.2d at 919 . | 2 | 1995–1995 |
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2017That vehicle is not available to the parties on retrial”; and (4) while Hartfield’s attorney alluded to some witnesses that testified in the 1977 trial now being deceased, there is no evidence in the record supporting that claim (other than such evidence produced at the trial on the merits).” The trial court also conducted a speedy-trial analysis utilizing the four factors as set forth in Barker v. Wingo. 407 U.S. 514, 530-33 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972) (holding that the four factors courts should assess in determining whether a defendant has been deprived of his right to a speedy 2017That vehicle is not available to the parties on retrial”; and (4) while Hartfield’s attorney alluded to some witnesses that testified in the 1977 trial now being deceased, there is no evidence in the record supporting that claim (other than such evidence produced at the trial on the merits).” The trial court also conducted a speedy-trial analysis utilizing the four factors as set forth in Barker v. Wingo. 407 U.S. 514, 530-33 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972) (holding that the four factors courts should assess in determining whether a defendant has been deprived of his right to a speedy | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In Re Chavez
green
1 sentence2015See In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d at 662 ; In re Davidson, 153 S.W.3d 490, 491 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2004, orig. proceeding); In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d at 228 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Ford Motor Co. v. Castillo
green
1 sentence2015The jury’s question made no representation at all, let alone a false or material one.” However, as set out above, the Texas Supreme Court concluded that the jury note implied material statements that were false, and it concluded that the note constituted some evidence to support the jury’s finding that there was a misrepresentation. 3 The Texas Supreme Court disagreed and concluded that Cortez’s inability to recall any details of her jury service or explain what had occurred combined with other circumstantial evidence was “some evidence from which the jury could have reasonably inferred collus | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Ex Parte Acly
green
1 sentence2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Gray v. Robinson
green
1 sentence1992Gray v. Robinson, supra; Harriel v. State, supra; Williams v. State, supra. If appellant’s contention is that he was denied counsel at this stage, it is his responsibility to establish a record supporting that claim. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.