Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Patrick W.Y. Tam Trustgreen2 sentences2024Tam Trust, 235 S.W.3d 819, 828 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007) (“Because the Trust presented competent, uncontroverted evidence of its right to attorney’s fees and because the Smiths did not challenge the amount, nature, or necessity of these fees, we conclude the trial judge abused his discretion in awarding $7500.”), rev’d, 296 S.W.3d 545 (Tex. 2009). 2020Tam Trust, 235 S.W.3d 819, 828 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007) (“Because the Trust presented competent, uncontroverted evidence of its right to attorney’s fees and because the Smiths did not challenge the amount, nature, or necessity of these fees, we conclude the trial judge abused his discretion in awarding $7500.”), rev’d, 296 S.W.3d 545 (Tex. 2009). | 3 | 4 |
Bowie Memorial Hospital v. Wrightgreen2 sentences2010See Bowie Mem’l Hosp., 79 S.W.3d at 52 ; Palacios, 46 S.W.3d at 879 . 2010See Bowie Mem’l, 79 S.W.3d at 52 ; Palacios, 46 S.W.3d at 879 . | 2 | 2 |
Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, Llpgreen1 sentence2025See Rohrmoos Venture v. UTSW DVA Healthcare, LLP, 578 S.W.3d 469, 480 (Tex. 2019) (courts are to broadly construe issues to encompass core questions). | 1 | 1 |
Flores v. Millennium Interests, Ltd.green2 sentences2015See Flores v. Millennium, Interests, Ltd., 185 S.W.3d 427, 429 (Tex.2005). 2015See Flores v. Millennium, Interests, Ltd., 185 S.W.3d 427, 429 (Tex.2005). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Sinclair Refining Co.green1 sentence2010Accordingly, we hold that Oliver’s claims against Hexion, his employer, arising from his abestos-exposure while working at the Hexion facility as an employee of Smith-Douglas, are barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Act. *382 We decline the Smiths’ request to apply, on the facts presented, the “dual-persona” doctrine as a means to avoid the exclusive remedy provision of the Act. 10 See Davis, 704 S.W.2d at 414 (explaining that “dual persona” doctrine is “a concept based upon the surviving corporation’s responsibilities under the statutory merger scheme as separate from its role as | 1 | 1 |
First Title Co. of Waco v. Garrettgreen1 sentence2003First Title of Waco v. Garrett, 860 S.W.2d 74, 78 (Tex.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Neagle v. Nelsongreen1 sentence1993Neagle v. Nelson, 685 S.W.2d 11, 12 (Tex.1985). | 1 | 1 |
Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert Blackmongreen1 sentence1993See Chrysler Corp., 841 S.W.2d at 850 ; see also Braden, 811 S.W.2d at 929 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Patrick W.Y. Tam Trust
green
2 sentences2024Tam Trust, 235 S.W.3d 819, 828 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007) (“Because the Trust presented competent, uncontroverted evidence of its right to attorney’s fees and because the Smiths did not challenge the amount, nature, or necessity of these fees, we conclude the trial judge abused his discretion in awarding $7500.”), rev’d, 296 S.W.3d 545 (Tex. 2009). 2020Tam Trust, 235 S.W.3d 819, 828 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007) (“Because the Trust presented competent, uncontroverted evidence of its right to attorney’s fees and because the Smiths did not challenge the amount, nature, or necessity of these fees, we conclude the trial judge abused his discretion in awarding $7500.”), rev’d, 296 S.W.3d 545 (Tex. 2009). | 2 | 2020–2024 |
Ragsdale v. Progressive Voters League
green
2 sentences2014Because the attorney's fees evidence met those (citing Ragsdale, 801 S.W.2d at 881 ). 2009The court of appeals vacated the $7,500 attorney’s fee award and rendered judgment for $47,438.75 instead, holding that “[bjecause the Trust presented competent, uncontroverted evidence of its right to attorney’s fees and because the Smiths did not challenge the amount, nature, or necessity of these fees ... the trial judge abused his discretion in awarding $7,500.” 235 S.W.3d 819, 828 (citing Ragsdale, 801 S.W.2d at 881 ). | 2 | 2009–2014 |
American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Palacios
green
2 sentences2010See Bowie Mem’l Hosp., 79 S.W.3d at 52 ; Palacios, 46 S.W.3d at 879 . 2010See Bowie Mem’l, 79 S.W.3d at 52 ; Palacios, 46 S.W.3d at 879 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Nicholson v. Herman
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 57 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.
green
1 sentence2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Smith v. Union Automobile Indemnity Co.
green
1 sentence2007Smith, 257 Ill. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.